Background: The reconstruction of midface skin defects represents a challenge for the head and neck surgeon due to the midface’s significant role in defining important facial traits. Due to the high complexity of the midface region, there is no possibility to use one definitive flap for all purposes. For moderate defects, the most common reconstructive techniques are represented by regional flaps. These flaps can be defined as donor tissue with a pedunculated axial blood supply not necessarily adjacent to the defect. The aim of this study is to highlight the more common surgical techniques adopted for midface reconstruction, providing a focus on each technique with its description and indications. Methods: A literature review was conducted using PubMed, an international database. The target of the research was to collect at least 10 different surgical techniques. Results: Twelve different techniques were selected and cataloged. The flaps included were the bilobed flap, rhomboid flap, facial-artery-based flaps (nasolabial flap, island composite nasal flap, retroangular flap), cervicofacial flap, paramedian forehead flap, frontal hairline island flap, keystone flap, Karapandzic flap, Abbè flap, and Mustardè flap. Conclusions: The study of the facial subunits, the location and size of the defect, the choice of the appropriate flap, and respect for the vascular pedicles are the key elements for optimal outcomes.

Background/Objectives: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common malignant tumor of the minor salivary glands, often affecting the hard palate. Preoperative diagnosis and surgical planning are challenging due to anatomical complexity and limitations in sampling, generally obtained by fine-needle aspiration (FNA). This study retrospectively evaluated the diagnostic and therapeutic performance of a high-definition ultrasound (HDUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology/biopsy (FNAC/FNAB) protocol in diagnosing intraoral MEC, based on the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC), with the relative clinical outcomes. Methods: A cohort of 64 patients with histologically confirmed MEC of the minor salivary glands, treated between 2000 and 2022, was retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent HDUS-guided FNAC/FNAB, imaging (CT, MRI, and panoramic X-ray), and subsequent surgical treatment. The cytological specimens were classified using the MSRSGC. Surgical margins, histopathological findings, lymph node status, and follow-up outcomes were recorded. Results: Of 64 MECs, 42 cases were finally diagnosed as low-grade (LG)/intermediate grade (IG) and 22 as high-grade (HG) carcinomas, using a two-tier histological classification system. HDUS accurately delineated the lesion size, infiltration depth, and bone proximity, with excellent correlation with surgical specimens (difference ≤ 0.6 mm). MSRSGC classification distributed the cases across all categories, with 28 classified as malignant (category VI). Repeat FNAC improved the diagnostic yield in non-diagnostic and atypical cases. FNAB confirmed the cytological findings in all cases, with immunohistochemistry investigation with Ki-67 supporting tumor grading. Surgical margins were clear in all resections. Lymph node metastases were identified in all patients who underwent neck dissection (n = 18), all with HG-MEC. No recurrences occurred among the LG/IG-MEC patients during a median 2-year follow-up. Conclusions: The combined use of HDUS and FNAC/FNAB, interpreted through the MSRSGC framework, offers a highly accurate, minimally invasive approach for preoperative diagnosis and surgical planning in intraoral MEC. HDUS-guided cytology significantly improves diagnostic reliability, particularly in LG/IG and cystic variants, facilitating tailored surgical management. Also, the clinical outcomes may support the possibility of using a simplified grading classification for two histopathological types.

Gingival cysts of the adult are rare and benign odontogenic lesions of the oral cavity, accounting for almost 0.3% of all odontogenic cysts. Their differential diagnosis is still challenging for surgeons as it includes other gingival inflammatory or non-inflammatory lesions and peripheral odontogenic tumors. The aim of this paper is to report a new case occurring in an adult, analyzing the clinical, radiographic, and histopathological features as guidelines for a differential diagnosis. We report a 49-year-old patient complaining of a small, pigmented lesion localized on the attached gingiva with no history of trauma, which was surgically excised and histologically diagnosed as a gingival cyst. A differential diagnosis may be challenging for clinicians it includes a wide spectrum of inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions, so a correct diagnostical–therapeutical approach is needed to avoid possible overtreatment and minimize the recurrence rate.

Background/Objectives: Odontogenic keratocysts are benign cysts originating from remnants of the dental lamina, rarely showing peripheral (gingival) localization. In this study, we compiled data on the peripheral variant by reviewing the literature and presenting a new case to establish criteria for accurate differential diagnosis and treatment. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA flowchart, leading to the collection of existing data on peripheral odontogenic keratocyst. In addition, we present a new case of a 68-year-old female patient referred to our attention for an asymptomatic swelling of the mandible in the premolar area. Radiographic examination revealed a round radiolucency with well-defined borders located between teeth #4.3 and #4.4, surgically removed and diagnosed as a peripheral (gingival) keratocyst. Results: Including the herein described new case, 37 cases were reviewed from data literature showing occurrence in the mandible (43.2%) and maxilla (46%)—with 10.8% of cases not stated-, with an age range of 14–83 year old, recurrence rate of 12.5–13.6% (total recurrences/total cases) and median follow-up time of 19 months. Conclusions: Data from literature highlights the rarity of odontogenic keratocyst with peripheral (gingival) localization, which can be misleading for differential diagnosis, emphasizing the necessity of histopathological examination as the definitive diagnostic tool for all the cystic lesions of the jaws. The absence of pathognomonic clinical and radiological features, combined with the potential for extraosseous manifestation of odontogenic lesions with high recurrence rates, underscores the importance of complete excision to ensure proper healing and prevent recurrence of odontogenic keratocyst.

Background: Metastatic tumors of the oro-facial tissuesare rare, with an incidence ranging between 1% and 8% of all oral malignant tumors. Generally reported with a peak of incidence in the 5–7th decades but possibly occurring at any age, metastases may represent the first sign of an occult cancer or manifest in patients with an already known history of a primary carcinoma, mostly from the lungs, kidney, prostate, and colon/rectum in males, and the uterus, breast, lung, and ovary in females. In the oro-facial tissues, the most involved sites are the oral mucosa, gingiva/jawbones, tongue, and salivary glands. Methods: A broad and deep literature review with a comprehensive analysis of the existing research on oro-facial metastases from renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) was conducted by searching the most used databases, with attention also paid to the clear-cell histological variant, which is the most frequent one. Results: Among the 156 analyzed studies, 206 cases of oro-facial metastases of renal cancer were found in patients with an average age of 60.9 years (145 males, 70.3%; 61 females, 29.6%). In almost 40% of the cases, metastasis represented the first clinical manifestation of the primary tumor, and 122 were histologically diagnosed as clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma (ccRCC) (59.2%). The tongue was involved in most of the cases (55 cases, 26.7%), followed by the gingiva (39 cases, 18.9%), mandible (35 cases, 16.9%), maxilla (23 cases, 11.1%), parotid gland (22 cases, 10.6%), buccal mucosa (11 cases, 5.3%), lips (7 cases, 3.3%), hard palate (6 cases, 2.8%), soft palate, masticatory space, and submandibular gland (2 cases, 0.9%), and lymph nodes, tonsils, and floor of the mouth (1 case, 0.4%). Among the 122 ccRCCs (84 males, 68.8%; 38 females, 31.1%), with an average age of 60.8 years and representing in 33.6% the first clinical manifestation, the tongue remained the most frequent site (31 cases, 25.4%), followed by the gingiva (21 cases, 17.2%), parotid gland (16 cases, 13.1%), mandibular bone (15 cases, 12.2%), maxillary bone (14 cases, 11.4%), buccal mucosa and lips (6 cases, 4.9%), hard palate (5 cases, 4%), submandibular gland and soft palate (2 cases, 1.6%), and lymph nodes, tonsils, oral floor, and masticatory space (1 case, 0.8%). The clinical presentation in soft tissues was mainly represented by a fast-growing exophytic mass, sometimes accompanied by pain, while in bone, it generally presented as radiolucent lesions with ill-defined borders and cortical erosion. Conclusions: The current comprehensive review collected data from the literature about the incidence, site of occurrence, age, sex, and survival of patients affected by oro-facial metastases from renal-cell carcinoma, with particular attention paid to the cases diagnosed as metastases from clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma, which is the most frequent histological variant. Clinical differential diagnosis is widely discussed to provide clinicians with all the useful information for an early diagnosis despite the effective difficulties in recognizing such rare and easily misdiagnosed lesionsTheir early identification represents a diagnostic challenge, especially when the clinical work-up is limited to the cervico–facial region. Nevertheless, early diagnosis and recently introduced adjuvant therapies may represent the key to better outcomes in such patients. Therefore, general guidelines about the clinical and radiological identification of oro-facial potentially malignant lesions should be part of the cultural background of any dentist.

Peripheral developing odontoma is a rare odontogenic lesion that mostly occurs in children. Their clinical and radiological features generally provide clinical suspicion of a benign lesion but only a histological examination may lead to the final diagnosis. Surgical management is generally easy and resolutive, but it can become more complicated in uncooperative patients and may thus require additional procedures to perform a fit surgery. We report a case of peripheral developing odontoma of the palatal aspect of the anterior maxilla that occurred in an uncooperative child subsequently treated by diode laser surgery, highlighting the benefit of this kind of surgery in pediatric patients. Data from the literature on peripheral developing odontoma have been collected and discussed with a narrative review.