Colorectal cancer (CRC) constitutes a major global health concern, ranking as the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The current review explores sex-based differences in CRC epidemiology, risk factors, tumor biology, and clinical outcomes. Males exhibit a higher incidence and mortality rate, with left-sided (distal) CRC predominating, while females are more frequently diagnosed with right-sided (proximal) tumors, which tend to be more aggressive and less responsive to conventional chemotherapy. Genetic disparities, including microsatellite instability and X-chromosome tumor suppressor genes, contribute to sex-specific differences in tumor progression and treatment response. Immune variations also influence disease outcomes, with females exhibiting stronger immune surveillance but higher exhaustion markers. Lifestyle factors such as body mass index (BMI), smoking, and hormonal influences further modulate CRC risk. While males are more vulnerable to obesity-related CRC, central obesity (waist-to-hip ratio) emerges as a stronger predictor in females. Additionally, smoking increases CRC risk differentially by tumor location. These findings underscore the importance of sex-specific approaches in CRC prevention, screening, and treatment, advocating for personalized medicine strategies tailored to gender-based biological and clinical distinctions.

Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, and 20–30% of patients will develop liver metastases (CRLM) during their lifetime. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is also one of the most common cancers worldwide with increasing incidence. Hepatic resection represents the most effective treatment approach for both CRLM and HCC. Recently, sarcopenia has gained popularity as a prognostic index in order to assess the perioperative risk of hepatectomies. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of sarcopenia on the overall survival (OS), complication rates and mortality of patients undergoing liver resections for HCC or CRLM. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed for studies including patients undergoing hepatectomy for HCC or CRLM, and a meta-analysis of the data was performed. Results: Sarcopenic patients had a significantly lower 5-year OS compared to non-sarcopenic patients (43.8% vs. 63.6%, respectively; p < 0.01) and a significantly higher complication rate (35.4% vs. 23.1%, respectively; p = 0.002). Finally, no statistical correlation was found in mortality between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients (p > 0.1). Conclusions: Sarcopenia was significantly associated with decreased 5-year OS and increased morbidity, but no difference was found with regard to postoperative mortality.

Background: Colorectal cancer is the second most common type of cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Approximately 15% of the patients with colorectal cancer will already have liver metastases (CRLMs) at diagnosis. Luckily, the advances in chemotherapy regimens during the past few decades have led to increased rates of disease regression that could even render an originally unresectable disease resectable. In certain patients with CRLMs, the hepatic lesions are missing on preoperative imaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These patients can undergo surgery with or without resection of the sites of the disappearing liver metastases (DLMs). In this systematic review, we assess the recurrence rate of the DLMs that were left unresected as well as the complete pathologic response of those resected. Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed for studies including patients with CRLMs who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had DLMs in preoperative imaging. Two independent reviewers completed the search according to the PRISMA checklist. Results: Three hundred and twenty-six patients with 1134 DLMs were included in our review. A total of 47 out of 480 DLMs (72.29%) that were removed had viable tumor cells in postoperative histology. One hundred and forty-five tumors could not be identified intraoperatively and were removed based on previous imaging, with thirty (20.69%) of them presenting viable cancer cells. Four hundred and sixty-five lesions could not be identified and were left in place. Of them, 152 (32.69%) developed local recurrence within 5 years. Of note, 34 DLMs could not be categorized as viable or non-viable tumors. Finally, DLMs that were identifiable intraoperatively had a higher possibility of viable tumors compared to non-identifiable ones (72.29% vs. 20.69%, respectively). Conclusions: Disappearing liver metastases that are left unresected have an increased possibility of recurrence. Patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment for CRLMs may have better survival chances after resecting all the DLM sites, either identifiable intraoperatively or not.

Introduction: Gastric cancer (GC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Even though surgery and chemotherapy are the mainstay of treatment, immunotherapy, and more specifically anti-tumor vaccination, has gained popularity over the past years due to the lower related toxicity and fewer long-term side effects. Dendritic cell (DC) vaccines have been shown to induce tumor specific cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) responses both in vitro and in vivo; however, due to the nature of the disease, resistance to immunotherapy is often developed. Various modifications, such as the implementation of viral vectors, tumor RNA, or even tumor-specific peptides (neoantigens), have been studied as a means to avoid resistance and enhance the effectiveness of the vaccines. In this review, we aim to assess the effects of neoantigen-loaded DC vaccines (naDCVs) on the immune response against gastric cancer cells. Materials and methods: A thorough literature search was conducted on PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov for studies assessing the efficacy of naDCVs against gastric cancer both in vivo and in vitro. The studies were assessed for eligibility by two independent reviewers based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The search was completed following the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Eleven studies were included in our systematic review. In five of the studies, the effects of the naDCVs were tested in vitro; in two and in four they were examined both in vitro and in vivo. The in vitro studies showed that the naDCVs resulted in a more robust immune response against the cancer cells in the study groups compared to the control groups. The in vivo studies conducted on mice showed that tumor volume was reduced in the groups treated with the naDCV compared to the untreated groups. What is more, the cytotoxic effect of CTLs against tumor cells was also increased in the vaccine groups. One of the studies was conducted on humans as a phase I study. The results show increased CTL proliferation and cytokine production in the vaccinated group compared to the control, but no difference regarding the tumor size was observed. Conclusions: Neoantigen-loaded DC vaccines can stimulate a strong immune response against specific gastric cancer cell peptides and enhance tumor cell lysis, therefore hindering or even reversing disease progression, offering great potential for the treatment of patients with gastric cancer.

Background/Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most commonly reported malignancies globally, taking the third place in incidence among males as well as the second among females, with over 1.9 million new cases and 935,000 deaths estimated worldwide in 2020. One of the most common and clinically significant comorbidities in patients undergoing CRC surgery is preoperative anemia, with reported prevalence ranging from 23% to over 60% depending on the population and diagnostic criteria used. The objective of the current study is to systematically evaluate the current body of evidence on preoperative anemia management in adults undergoing surgery for non-metastatic CRC. This review aims to assess the clinical impact of different iron supplementation strategies, particularly IV versus oral iron in pre-operative hematologic optimization, transfusion requirements, postoperative complications, and recovery outcomes. Methods: The current systematic review was conducted based on the PRISMA for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis checklist. The study has been registered to PROSPERO with the ID CRD420251113455. Results: Across all studies, IV iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents emerged as safe and more efficient alternatives to iron per os, especially when initiated at least two weeks before surgery. Thus, highlighting the clinical value of proactive anemia management as a cornerstone of surgical prehabilitation, potentially reducing transfusion burden and improving recovery outcomes for CRC patients. Conclusions: It is observed that IV iron therapy offers a more effective strategy than per os supplementation for correcting preoperative anemia in non-metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Their hematologic benefits enhance surgical readiness and reduce postoperative intervention needs. Thus, supporting the integration of IV iron into preoperative optimization protocols.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most aggressive and fatal malignancies worldwide, posing a significant global health challenge due to its high mortality rates, late-stage diagnosis, and limited therapeutic efficacy