Oliver Cliff

Mr. Oliver Cliff

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 November 2020 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCSheryl Le Chang
Sheryl Le Chang
NHNathan Harding
Nathan Harding
CZCameron Zacherson
Cameron Zacherson
OCOliver Cliff
Oliver Cliff
MPMikhail Prokopenko
Mikhail Prokopenko
There is a continuing debate on relative benefits of various mitigation and suppression strategies aimed to control the spread of COVID-19. Here we report the results of agent-based modelling using a fine-grained computational simulation of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. This model is calibrated to match key characteristics of COVID-19 transmission. An important calibration outcome is the age-dependent fraction of symptomatic cases, with this fraction for children found to be one-fifth of such fraction for adults. We apply the model to compare several intervention strategies, including restrictions on international air travel, case isolation, home quarantine, social distancing with varying levels of compliance, and school closures. School closures are not found to bring decisive benefits unless coupled with high level of social distancing compliance. We report several trade-offs, and an important transition across the levels of social distancing compliance, in the range between 70% and 80% levels, with compliance at the 90% level found to control the disease within 13–14 weeks, when coupled with effective case isolation and international travel restrictions.

1 September 2018 in Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OCOliver Cliff
Oliver Cliff
NHNathan Harding
Nathan Harding
MPMahendra Piraveenan
Mahendra Piraveenan
EEE. Yagmur Erten
E. Yagmur Erten
MGManoj Gambhir
Manoj Gambhir
MPMikhail Prokopenko
Mikhail Prokopenko

17 October 2018 in Science Robotics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OCOliver Cliff
Oliver Cliff
DSDebra L. Saunders
Debra L. Saunders
RFRobert Fitch
Robert Fitch
Understanding animal movements that underpin ecosystem processes is fundamental to ecology. Recent advances in animal tags have increased the ability to remotely locate larger species; however, this technology is not suitable for up to 70% of the world’s bird and mammal species. The most widespread technique for tracking small animals is to manually locate low-power radio transmitters from the ground with handheld equipment. Despite this labor-intensive technique being used for decades, efforts to reduce or automate this process have had limited success. Here, we present an approach for tracking small radio-tagged animals by using an autonomous and lightweight aerial robot. We present experimental results where we used the robot to locate critically endangered swift parrots (Lathamus discolor) within their winter range. The system combines a miniaturized sensor with newly developed estimation algorithms to yield unambiguous bearing- and range-based measurements with associated measures of uncertainty. We incorporated these measurements into Bayesian data fusion and information-based planning algorithms to control the position of the robot as it collected data. We report estimated positions that lie within about 50 meters of the true positions of the birds on average, which are sufficiently accurate for recapture or observation. Further, in comparison with experienced human trackers from locations where the signal was detectable, the robot produced a correct estimate as fast or faster than the human. These results provide validation of robotic systems for wildlife radio telemetry and suggest a way for widespread use as human-assistive or autonomous devices.

13 July 2015
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
OCOliver Cliff
Oliver Cliff
RFRobert Fitch
Robert Fitch
SSSalah Sukkarieh
Salah Sukkarieh
DSDebbie Saunders
Debbie Saunders
RHRobert Heinsohn
Robert Heinsohn

12 February 2021 in Physical Review Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OCOliver Cliff
Oliver Cliff
LNLeonardo Novelli
Leonardo Novelli
BFBenjamin Fulcher
Benjamin Fulcher
JSJames Shine
James Shine
Joseph LizierJoseph Lizier
Joseph Lizier
Inferring linear dependence between time series is central to our understanding of natural and artificial systems. Unfortunately, the hypothesis tests that are used to determine statistically significant directed or multivariate relationships from time-series data often yield spurious associations (Type I errors) or omit causal relationships (Type II errors). This is due to the autocorrelation present in the analyzed time series—a property that is ubiquitous across diverse applications, from brain dynamics to climate change. Here we show that, for limited data, this issue cannot be mediated by fitting a time-series model alone (e.g., in Granger causality or prewhitening approaches), and instead that the degrees of freedom in statistical tests should be altered to account for the effective sample size induced by cross-correlations in the observations. This insight enabled us to derive modified hypothesis tests for any multivariate correlation-based measures of linear dependence between covariance-stationary time series, including Granger causality and mutual information with Gaussian marginals. We use both numerical simulations (generated by autoregressive models and digital filtering) as well as recorded fMRI-neuroimaging data to show that our tests are unbiased for a variety of stationary time series. Our experiments demonstrate that the commonly used F- and χ2-tests can induce significant false-positive rates of up to 100% for both measures, with and without prewhitening of the signals. These findings suggest that many dependencies reported in the scientific literature may have been, and may continue to be, spuriously reported or missed if modified hypothesis tests are not used when analyzing time series.

1 February 2017 in Artificial Life
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OCOliver Cliff
Oliver Cliff
Joseph LizierJoseph Lizier
Joseph Lizier
XWX. Rosalind Wang
X. Rosalind Wang
PWPeter Wang
Peter Wang
OOOliver Obst
Oliver Obst
MPMikhail Prokopenko
Mikhail Prokopenko
We develop and apply several novel methods quantifying dynamic multi-agent team interactions. These interactions are detected information-theoretically and captured in two ways: via (i) directed networks (interaction diagrams) representing significant coupled dynamics between pairs of agents, and (ii) state-space plots (coherence diagrams) showing coherent structures in Shannon information dynamics. This model-free analysis relates, on the one hand, the information transfer to responsiveness of the agents and the team, and, on the other hand, the information storage within the team to the team's rigidity and lack of tactical flexibility. The resultant interaction and coherence diagrams reveal implicit interactions, across teams, that may be spatially long-range. The analysis was verified with a statistically significant number of experiments (using simulated football games, produced during RoboCup 2D Simulation League matches), identifying the zones of the most intense competition, the extent and types of...