Patrizia Riso

Prof. Patrizia Riso

Department of Food, Environmental, and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 August 2021 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mirko MarinoMirko Marino
Mirko Marino
FPFederica Puppo
Federica Puppo
Cristian Del Bo'Cristian Del Bo'
Cristian Del Bo'
Valentina VinelliValentina Vinelli
Valentina Vinelli
Patrizia RisoPatrizia Riso
Patrizia Riso
Daniela MartiniDaniela Martini
Daniela Martini
A debate is ongoing on the significance and appropriateness of the NOVA classification as a tool for categorizing foods based on their degree of processing. As such, the role of ultra-processed food (UPF) on human health is still not completely understood. With this review, we aimed to investigate the actual level of consumption of UPF across countries and target populations to determine the impact in real contexts. Suitable articles published up to March 2021 were sourced through the PubMed and SCOPUS databases. Overall, 99 studies providing data on the level of UPF consumption expressed as the percentage of total energy intake were identified, for a total of 1,378,454 participants. Most of them were published in Brazil (n = 38) and the United States (n = 15), and the 24 h recall was the most-used tool (n = 63). Analysis of the results revealed that the United States and the United Kingdom were the countries with the highest percent energy intake from UPF (generally >50%), whereas Italy had the lowest levels (about 10%); the latter was inversely associated with adherence to the Mediterranean diet. High variability was also observed based on sex, age, and body mass index, with men, young people, and overweight/obese subjects generally having higher levels of consumption compared to older subjects. Overall, our findings underline the large differences in UPF intake. Since most of the observations derived from studies conducted with food questionnaires are not specifically validated for UPF, further efforts are essential to confirm the results previously obtained and to investigate further the association between UPF consumption and health status, also considering the actual contribution within different dietary patterns, which has been less investigated to date.

16 June 2019 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Cristian Del Bo'Cristian Del Bo'
Cristian Del Bo'
SBStefano Bernardi
Stefano Bernardi
Mirko MarinoMirko Marino
Mirko Marino
MPMarisa Porrini
Marisa Porrini
Massimiliano TucciMassimiliano Tucci
Massimiliano Tucci
Patrizia RisoPatrizia Riso
Patrizia Riso
Growing evidence support association between polyphenol intake and reduced risk for chronic diseases, even if there is a broad debate about the effective amount of polyphenols able to exert such protective effect. The present systematic review provides an overview of the last 10-year literature on the evaluation of polyphenol intake and its association with specific disease markers and/or endpoints. An estimation of the mean total polyphenol intake has been performed despite the large heterogeneity of data reviewed. In addition, the contribution of dietary sources was considered, suggesting tea, coffee, red wine, fruit and vegetables as the main products providing polyphenols. Total flavonoids and specific subclasses, but not total polyphenols, have been apparently associated with a low risk of diabetes, cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. However, large variability in terms of methods for the evaluation and quantification of polyphenol intake, markers and endpoints considered, makes it still difficult to establish an evidence-based reference intake for the whole class and subclass of compounds. Nevertheless, the critical mass of data available seem to strongly suggest the protective effect of a polyphenol-rich dietary pattern even if further well targeted and methodologically sound research should be encouraged in order to define specific recommendations.

21 June 2022 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Valentina VinelliValentina Vinelli
Valentina Vinelli
Paola BiscottiPaola Biscotti
Paola Biscotti
Daniela MartiniDaniela Martini
Daniela Martini
Cristian Del Bo'Cristian Del Bo'
Cristian Del Bo'
Mirko MarinoMirko Marino
Mirko Marino
Patrizia RisoPatrizia Riso
Patrizia Riso
There is an increasing interest in investigating dietary strategies able to modulate the gut microbial ecosystem which, in turn, may play a key role in human health. Dietary fibers (DFs) are widely recognized as molecules with prebiotic effects. The main objective of this systematic review was to: (i) analyze the results available on the impact of DF intervention on short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) production; (ii) evaluate the interplay between the type of DF intervention, the gut microbiota composition and its metabolic activities, and any other health associated outcome evaluated in the host. To this aim, initially, a comprehensive database of literature on human intervention studies assessing the effect of confirmed and candidate prebiotics on the microbial ecosystem was developed. Subsequently, studies performed on DFs and analyzing at least the impact on SCFA levels were extracted from the database. A total of 44 studies from 42 manuscripts were selected for the analysis. Among the different types of fiber, inulin was the DF investigated the most (n = 11). Regarding the results obtained on the ability of fiber to modulate total SCFAs, seven studies reported a significant increase, while no significant changes were reported in five studies, depending on the analytical methodology used. A total of 26 studies did not show significant differences in individual SCFAs, while the others reported significant differences for one or more SCFAs. The effect of DF interventions on the SCFA profile seemed to be strictly dependent on the dose and the type and structure of DFs. Overall, these results underline that, although affecting microbiota composition and derived metabolites, DFs do not produce univocal significant increase in SCFA levels in apparently healthy adults. In this regard, several factors (i.e., related to the study protocols and analytical methods) have been identified that could have affected the results obtained in the studies evaluated. Future studies are needed to better elucidate the relationship between DFs and gut microbiota in terms of SCFA production and impact on health-related markers.

7 November 2011 in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SVStefano Vendrame
Stefano Vendrame
Simone GuglielmettiSimone Guglielmetti
Simone Guglielmetti
Patrizia RisoPatrizia Riso
Patrizia Riso
Stefania ArioliStefania Arioli
Stefania Arioli
DKDorothy Klimis-Zacas
Dorothy Klimis-Zacas
MPMarisa Porrini
Marisa Porrini

10 March 2010 in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NPNicoletta Pellegrini
Nicoletta Pellegrini
Emma ChiavaroEmma Chiavaro
Emma Chiavaro
CGClaudio Gardana
Claudio Gardana
TMTeresa Mazzeo
Teresa Mazzeo
DCDaniele Contino
Daniele Contino
MPMarisa Porrini
Marisa Porrini

26 June 2012 in European Journal of Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Patrizia RisoPatrizia Riso
Patrizia Riso
DKDorothy Klimis-Zacas
Dorothy Klimis-Zacas
Cristian Del Bo'Cristian Del Bo'
Cristian Del Bo'
Daniela MartiniDaniela Martini
Daniela Martini
JCJonica Campolo
Jonica Campolo
MPMarisa Porrini
Marisa Porrini