Background and Objectives: The impact of craniocervical posture on malocclusion has long intrigued researchers in dentistry, orthodontics, and physical therapy. This research aims to elucidate the relationship between craniocervical posture and both dental and skeletal malocclusions and to explore the potential for integrated multidisciplinary therapeutic approaches. Materials and Methods: We analyzed peer-reviewed articles published between 2013 and 2023 from PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Scopus. The search strategy included terms related to craniocervical posture and malocclusion, focusing on studies that evaluated the relationship between these conditions before and after various orthodontic or surgical treatments. Results: A total of 20 studies met the inclusion criteria, providing nuanced insights into the interplay between malocclusion types and craniocervical alignment. Findings suggest that altered craniocervical posture is more prevalent in individuals with skeletal malocclusions. In particular, orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery appear to influence craniocervical posture, suggesting a bidirectional relationship between craniofacial structure and neck alignment. Conclusions: Our literature review confirms a significant association between craniocervical posture and malocclusion, emphasizing the need for an integrative approach to the diagnosis and treatment of craniofacial anomalies. Future research should aim to quantify these relationships further through longitudinal studies, thereby increasing the understanding necessary to develop comprehensive treatment protocols.

The buccal fat pad and buccal mucosa are anatomical structures closely related to palatal clefts which can provide additional tissues for defect reconstruction which is crucial for practitioners aiming to lessen the need for additional corrective surgeries in patients with cleft palates and to lower the rates of residual palatal fistulae. Objectives: Aims to explore the recent scientific data available on the applications and outcomes of two surgical techniques involving the buccal fat pad and buccal mucosal flap in primary and secondary palatoplasty. Methods: The analyzed articles published between 2020 and 2025 from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The search strategy included terms related to buccal fat pad flaps, buccal mucosal flaps, and cleft palate repair. Results: After performing the search, including eligible articles and removing duplicates, 15 articles were included in this review. Eight studies explored the effectiveness of buccal fat pad or buccal mucosal flap during primary palatoplasty and seven studies for secondary palatoplasty. The articles included in this review provide insights on the usefulness of buccal fat pad flaps and buccal mucosal flaps in primary and secondary palatoplasty. Conclusions: The buccal fat pad and buccal mucosal flaps are highly effective in secondary palatoplasty, particularly for velopharyngeal dysfunction and fistula closure. In primary palatoplasty, the buccal fat pad flap aids mucosal healing, reduces complications, and improves speech, while the buccal mucosal flap is beneficial for wide palatal defects.