Aims: Either insufficient or excessive autophagy causes cellular death and contributes to myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. However, mechanisms controlling the ‘right-level’ of autophagy in the heart remains unidentified. Thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) is a pro-oxidative molecule knowing to contribute to I/R injury. However, whether and how TXNIP may further inhibit suppressed autophagy or promote excessive cardiac autophagy in I/R heart has not been previously investigated. Methods and results: Wild type or gene-manipulated adult male mice were subjected to myocardial I/R. TXNIP was increased in myocardium during I/R. Cardiac-specific TXNIP overexpression increased cardiomyocytes apoptosis and cardiac dysfunction, whereas cardiac-specific TXNIP knock-out significantly mitigated I/R-induced apoptosis and improved cardiac function. Importantly, TXNIP overexpression significantly promoted cardiac autophagy and TXNIP knock-out significantly inhibited cardiac autophagy. In vitro studies demonstrated that TXNIP increased autophagosome formation but inhibited autophagosome clearance during myocardial reperfusion. Atg5 siRNA significantly decreased hypoxia/reoxygenation induced apoptosis in cardiomyocytes with TXNIP overexpression. Mechanistically, TXNIP suppressed autophagosome clearance via increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) level. However, TXNIP-increased autophagosome formation was not mediated by ROS as a ROS scavenger failed to block increased autophagosome formation in TXNIP overexpression heart. Finally, TXNIP directly interacted and stabilized Redd1 (an autophagy regulator), resulting in mTOR inhibition and autophagy activation. Redd1 knock-down significantly reduced autophagy formation and ameliorated I/R injury in TXNIP overexpression hearts. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that increased TXNIP-Redd1 expression is a novel signalling pathway that contributes to I/R injury by exaggerating excessive autophagy during reperfusion. These observations advance our understanding of the mechanisms of myocardial I/R injury.

The aim of the present analysis is to compare the quantitative angiographic aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) among three balloon-expandable valves. Quantitative videodensitometric aortography is an objective, accurate, and reproducible tool for adjudication of AR following TAVI. This is a retrospective corelab analysis, independent from industry, of aortograms from patients treated with TAVI using the balloon-expandable Myval transcatheter heart valve (THV) (Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., India), Sapien 3, and XT THVs (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA). The study comprised of 108 analyzable aortograms from consecutive patients in a multicenter European registry who underwent Myval THV implantation. The results of quantitative assessment of AR in the Sapien 3 THV (n = 397) and Sapien XT THV (n = 239) were retrieved from a published pooled database. The Myval THV had the lowest proportion of patients with moderate or severe angiographic quantitative AR (2.8%) compared to the Sapien 3 THV (8.3%; p = 0.049) and Sapien XT THV (10.9%; p = 0.012). Furthermore, the Myval THV had the lowest mean angiographic quantitative AR (6.3 ± 6.3%), followed by Sapien 3 THV (7.6 ± 7.1%) and Sapien XT THV (8.8 ± 7.5%), and it was significantly lower than that of the Sapien XT THV (p = 0.006), but not significantly different from Sapien 3 THV (p = 0.246). The Myval THV, in comparison with other BEV’s analyzed in our database, showed a lower occurrence of moderate or severe AR after TAVI. These results should be confirmed in prospective cohorts of randomized patients with head-to-head THV comparisons.

Background: Data regarding the impact of successful chronic total occlusion treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO‐PCI) on symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in elderly patients (≥75 years) are unknown. This prospective study aimed to assess whether successful CTO‐PCI could improve the symptoms and QOL in elderly patients (≥75 years). Methods and Results: Consecutive patients who underwent elective CTO‐PCI were prospectively enrolled and subdivided into 3 groups based on age: age<65 years, 65 years≤age<75 years, and age≥75 years. The primary outcomes included symptoms, as assessed with the New York Heart Association functional class and Seattle Angina Questionnaire, and QOL, as assessed with the 12‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey questionnaire, at baseline, 1 month, and 1 year after successful CTO‐PCI. Of 1076 patients with CTO, 101 were age≥75 years (9.39%). Hemoglobin, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and left ventricular ejection fraction levels all decreased with increasing age, and NT‐proBNP (N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide) increased. The proportion of dyspnea and coronary lesions, including multivessel disease, multi‐CTO lesion, and calcification were higher in elderly patients. Procedural success rate, intraprocedural complications, and in‐hospital major adverse cardiac events were not statistically different in the 3 groups. Importantly, symptoms, including dyspnea and angina, were markedly improved regardless of age at 1‐month and 1‐year follow‐up ( P <0.05). Likewise, successful CTO‐PCI significantly improved QOL at 1‐month and 1‐year follow‐up ( P <0.01). Additionally, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events and all‐cause mortality at 1‐month and 1‐year follow‐up was not statistically different in the 3 groups. Conclusions: Successful PCI was beneficial and feasible to improve symptoms and QOL in patients ≥75 years of age with CTO.

Background: Several studies have suggested that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may reduce the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and/or aspirin, possibly leading to cardiovascular events.Aims: We aimed to investigate the association between PPI and clinical outcomes in patients treated with ticagrelor monotherapy or conventional antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods: This is a subanalysis of the randomized GLOBAL LEADERS trial, comparing the experimental antiplatelet arm (23‐month ticagrelor monotherapy following 1‐month dual antiplatelet therapy [DAPT]) with the reference arm (12‐month aspirin monotherapy following 12‐month DAPT) after PCI. Patient‐oriented composite endpoints (POCEs: all‐cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization) and its components were assessed stratified by PPI use as a time‐dependent covariate in patients with the experiment or reference antiplatelet arm.Results: Among 15,839 patients, 2115 patients (13.5%) experienced POCE at 2 years. In the reference arm, the use of PPIs was independently associated with POCE (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12–1.44) and its individual components, whereas it was not in the experimental arm (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.92–1.19; p_interaction = 0.035). During the second‐year follow‐up, patients taking aspirin with PPIs had a significantly higher risk of POCE compared to those on aspirin without PPIs (HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.27–1.94), whereas the risk did not differ significantly irrespective of PPI in ticagrelor monotherapy group (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.83–1.28; p_interaction = 0.008).Conclusions: In contrast to conventional antiplatelet strategy, there were no evidence suggesting the interaction between ticagrelor monotherapy and PPIs on increased cardiovascular events, which should be confirmed in further studies.Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov

Background: In clinical trials, the optimal method of adjudicating revascularization events as clinically or nonclinically indicated (CI) is to use an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC). However, the Academic Research Consortium-2 currently recommends using physiological assessment. The level of agreement between these methods of adjudication remains unknown. Methods: Data for all CEC adjudicated revascularization events among the 3457 patients followed-up for 2-years in the TALENT trial, and 3-years in the DESSOLVE III, PIONEER, and SYNTAX II trial were collected and readjudicated according to a quantitative flow ratio (QFR) analysis of the revascularized vessels, by an independent core lab blinded to the results of the conventional CEC adjudication. The κ statistic was used to assess the level of agreement between the 2 methods. Results: In total, 351 CEC-adjudicated repeat revascularization events occurred, with retrospective QFR analysis successfully performed in 212 (60.4%). According to QFR analysis, 104 events (QFR ≤0.80) were adjudicated as CI revascularizations and 108 (QFR >0.80) were not. The agreement between CEC and QFR based adjudication was just fair (κ=0.335). Between the 2 methods of adjudication, there was a disagreement of 26.4% and 7.1% in CI and non-CI revascularization, respectively. Overall, the concordance and discordance rates were 66.5% and 33.5%, respectively. Conclusions: In this event-level analysis, QFR based adjudication had a relatively low agreement with CEC adjudication with respect to whether revascularization events were CI or not. CEC adjudication appears to overestimate CI revascularization as compared with QFR adjudication. Direct comparison between these 2 strategies in terms of revascularization adjudication is warranted in future trials. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: TALENT trial: NCT02870140, DESSOLVE III trial: NCT02385279, SYNTAX II: NCT02015832, and PIONEER trial: NCT02236975.