Marija Majer

Dr. Marija Majer


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2019 in Applied Radiation and Isotopes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMarija Majer
Marija Majer
MRMatej Roguljić
Matej Roguljić
ŽKŽeljka Knežević
Željka Knežević
ASAndrey Starodumov
Andrey Starodumov
DFDinko Ferenček
Dinko Ferenček
BMBranka Mihaljević
Branka Mihaljević

27 February 2017 in Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMarija Majer
Marija Majer
LSLiliana Stolarczyk
Liliana Stolarczyk
MSMarijke De Saint-Hubert
Marijke De Saint-Hubert
DKDamian Kabat
Damian Kabat
ŽKŽeljka Knežević
Željka Knežević
RHRoger Harrison
Roger Harrison
The purpose of this study was to measure out-of-field organ doses in clinical conditions in anthropomorphic paediatric phantoms which received a simulated treatment of a brain tumour with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT). Organ doses measured with radiophotoluminescent and thermoluminescent dosemeters were on average 1.6 and 3.0 times higher for the 5 y-old than for the 10 y-old phantom for IMRT and 3D CRT, respectively. A larger 5-y to 10-y organ dose ratio for 3D CRT can be explained because the use of a mechanical wedge for the 5-y-old 3D CRT phantom treatment increased out-of-field doses. Due to different configurations of the radiation fields, for both phantoms, the IMRT technique resulted in a higher non-target brain dose and higher eye doses but lower thyroid doses compared to 3D CRT. For 3D CRT (which used a non-coplanar field configuration), eye doses were 3-6% and for IMRT (which used a coplanar field configuration) 27-30% of the treatment dose, respectively. For thyroid and more distant organs, doses were less than 1% of the treatment dose. Comparison of measured doses and doses calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS) showed that the TPS underestimated out-of-field doses both for IMRT and 3D CRT.

28 January 2022 in Medical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMarija Majer
Marija Majer
IAIva Ambrožová
Iva Ambrožová
MDMarie Davídková
Marie Davídková
MSMarijke De Saint‐Hubert
Marijke De Saint‐Hubert
MKMladen Kasabašić
Mladen Kasabašić
POPaweł Olko
Paweł Olko

1 February 2018 in Physica Medica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HJHannu Jarvinen
Hannu Jarvinen
JFJad Farah
Jad Farah
TSTeemu Siiskonen
Teemu Siiskonen
OCOlivera Ciraj-Bjelac
Olivera Ciraj-Bjelac
JDJérémie Dabin
Jérémie Dabin
ATAnnalisa Trianni
Annalisa Trianni

1 August 2021 in Radiation Measurements
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ŽKŽeljka Knežević
Željka Knežević
MMMarija Majer
Marija Majer
ZPZuzanna Pawłowska
Zuzanna Pawłowska
OBOlivera Ciraj Bjelac
Olivera Ciraj Bjelac
GIGiorgia Iurlaro
Giorgia Iurlaro
MŽMiloš Živanović
Miloš Živanović

17 January 2018 in Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMarijke De Saint-Hubert
Marijke De Saint-Hubert
MMMarija Majer
Marija Majer
HHHrvoje Hršak
Hrvoje Hršak
ZHZdravko Heinrich
Zdravko Heinrich
ŽKŽeljka Knežević
Željka Knežević
RHRoger M Harrison
Roger M Harrison
The purpose of this study was to measure out-of-field organ doses in two anthropomorphic child phantoms for the treatment of large brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) using hypofractionated gamma knife (GK) radiosurgery and to compare these with an alternative treatment using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Target volume was identical in size and shape in all cases. Radiophotoluminescent (RPL), thermoluminescent (TL) and optically stimulated luminescent (OSL) dosimeters were used for out-of-field dosimetry during GK treatment and a good agreement within 1–2% between results was shown. In addition, the use of multiple dosimetry systems strengthens the reliability of the findings. The number of GK isocentres was confirmed to be important for the magnitude of out-of-field doses. Measured GK doses for the same distance from the target, when expressed per target dose and isocentre, were comparable in both phantoms. GK out-of-field doses averaged for both phantoms were evaluated to be 120 mGy/Gy for eyes then sharply reduced to 20 mGy/Gy for mandible and slowly reduced up to 0.8 mGy/Gy for testes. Taking into account the fractionation regimen used to treat AVM patients, the total treatment organ doses to the out-of-field organs were calculated and compared with IMRT. The eyes were better spared with GK whilst for more distant organs doses were up to a factor of 2.8 and 4 times larger for GK compared to IMRT in 5-year and 10-year old phantoms, respectively. Presented out-of-field dose values are specific for the investigated AVM case, phantoms and treatment plans used for GK and IMRT, but provide useful information about out-of-field dose levels and emphasise their importance.