Background and Objectives: The objective of the study was to evaluate the epidemiology of slope-related accidents in a high-volume trauma center during the winter season. In addition, this study aims to analyze patient-related, equipment-related, and environment-related characteristics. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire containing 22 items was distributed to all adult patients admitted to the emergency department of the Brixen Hospital (Italy) during the 2023/24 winter season because of a ski/snowboard-related injury. Results: The final database included 579 questionnaires from 579 patients who ultimately entered the study: 285 were females and 294 were males. The analysis of risk factors for fractures revealed that patients with fractures were generally older (50.7 ± 16.0 years) compared to those without fractures (45.4 ± 17.2 years, p = 0.0021). Thirty-six percent of injuries were considered as joint sprain/ligament strain: patients in this group were younger (45.5 ± 16.2 years) compared to all patients (48.3 ± 17.3 years, p = 0.0151). Conclusions: In conclusion, this study identified significant risk factors associated with skiing and snowboarding injuries. Fractures were more common among older and more experienced skiers, particularly those who described themselves as experts. Ligamentous distortions were more common among younger and less experienced skiers. Fatigue is generally underestimated, and the general physical preparation is often lacking for sports like skiing and snowboarding. Additionally, the absence of significant correlations between weather conditions, snow quality, equipment type, and the difficulty of the slope with injury risk suggests that individual factors such as age and skill level are more critical determinants of injury risk than environmental or equipment-related factors.

Background and Objectives: Distal upper limb injuries are frequent in winter sports, but their functional impact is often underestimated. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology, mechanisms, and risk factors for injuries involving the forearm, wrist, hand, and fingers sustained during two consecutive winter seasons in the Italian Dolomites. Materials and Methods: All adult and willing patients presenting to the Emergency Department of Brixen Hospital after ski- or snowboard-related accidents between December 2023 and March 2025 completed a standardized 23-item questionnaire on demographics, experience level, environmental factors, equipment, and trauma mechanism. For the aim of this study only distal upper limb injuries were extracted and analyzed. Statistical analyses compared fracture versus non-fracture injuries, “good” versus “bad” fractures (AO classification and surgical complexity), and isolated ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries. Results: A total of 195 patients were analyzed: 96 (49.2%) sustained a fracture and 33 (16.9%) presented with isolated UCL lesions. Fractures occurred more frequently on blue slopes (56.2% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001), whereas non-fracture injuries predominated on red and off-piste slopes. Age, BMI, and skill level did not differ significantly between groups. Surgically classified complex distal forearm fractures were significantly more frequent in females (p < 0.005) but were not associated with environmental factors. UCL injuries occurred mainly on red slopes (54.5%) and were often related to pole entrapment during falls. None of the injured patients reported the use of protective wrist or thumb supports. Conclusions: Distal upper limb injuries are a common pattern of alpine sports trauma, with wrist fractures and skier’s thumb being predominant lesions. Low-speed falls on easy slopes are associated with wrist fractures, while UCL injuries are linked to intermediate slopes. Preventive strategies should include fall technique education, protective gloves, and improved pole ergonomics.

Gait analysis study comparing unicompartmental vs. total knee arthroplasty, differences in knee kinematics: a retrospective cohort study. Background and Objectives: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for advanced knee osteoarthritis, although functional outcomes may remain suboptimal in many patients. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) often provides better functional recovery but shows lower long-term implant survival. Recently, personalized TKA approaches have been developed to improve kinematic restoration and patient satisfaction. This study aimed to compare knee kinematics among patients who underwent personalized TKA, medial UKA, and healthy controls. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 9 patients treated with robotic-assisted personalized TKA, 9 patients treated with medial UKA, and 9 healthy controls matched for age, sex, and BMI. Inclusion criteria were age 60–80 years, Kellgren–Lawrence grade III–IV, a minimum follow-up of 12 months, deviation from neutral HKA < 15°, healthy contralateral knee, and high postoperative functional scores. Exclusion criteria included valgus knees (HKA > 180°), postoperative complications, and neuromotor disorders. In the TKA group, a Medial Congruent implant was implanted with ROSA robotic assistance using a restricted kinematic alignment (±5° HKA) and asymmetric intercompartmental balancing. In the UKA group, a fixed-bearing medial implant (Physica ZUK) was used. Gait analysis was performed on a markerless instrumented treadmill (WalkerView™; Dalmine, Italy). Differences between groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05). Results: UKA patients walked with a stiffer knee during stance. Knee range of motion during stance increased from UKA (6.3° ± 7.2°) to TKA (13.6° ± 8.8°, p = 0.045) and to controls (16.6° ± 4.5°, p = 0.02). During loading response, UKA patients showed lower flexion (10.2° ± 6.1°) than TKA (19.4° ± 7.9°, p = 0.049) and controls (19.6° ± 2.8°, p = 0.004). Knee flexion during swing was comparable between UKA and TKA. Conclusions: UKA patients demonstrated reduced knee flexion during early stance compared with robotic-assisted TKA and healthy controls. The observed differences may reflect multiple factors, including surgical technique, implant design, and patient-related characteristics. Because preoperative functional data were not available, potential selection bias cannot be excluded. These findings should be interpreted cautiously and warrant confirmation in larger prospective studies.