Purpose: The recent introduction of personalized alignment strategies in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has transformed adult reconstruction. Proponents advocate for these techniques due to their kinematic benefits compared to traditional methods. Current literature supports combining medial‐pivot designs with kinematic alignment (KA) surgery. This review summarizes the application of gait analysis in KA medial‐pivot TKA and recommends gait parameters related to patient satisfaction. Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR). One hundred twenty‐one articles from the three search engines underwent a preliminary title/abstract and full‐text screening. The final screening resulted in 23 systematic reviews (SR), meta‐analyses (M‐A) and narrative reviews (NR) as core articles of the current umbrella review. Results: Out of the original 121 SR/M‐A/NR articles, 23 (19%) were ultimately evaluated based on the reported results. Twelve articles fell into the first category (gait analysis following TKA as the main topic), five articles were designated for the second category (knee implant design), only one article was classified in the third category (kinematic alignment) and five articles were assigned to the fourth category (a combination of all main topics). Conclusions: The literature investigating the relationship between kinematic and spatiotemporal data and clinical outcomes following KA medial pivot TKA is limited. Few studies included in the current review showed that remote measurements using wearable sensors are more informative than patients' reported outcome measurements (PROMs) regarding a patient's daily level of activities and, ultimately, gait. The current review demonstrated that combining KA and MP designs can ensure a knee kinematic closer to normal than combining MA and more traditional implant designs. Level of Evidence: Level I.

Background and Objectives: The objective of the study was to evaluate the epidemiology of slope-related accidents in a high-volume trauma center during the winter season. In addition, this study aims to analyze patient-related, equipment-related, and environment-related characteristics. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire containing 22 items was distributed to all adult patients admitted to the emergency department of the Brixen Hospital (Italy) during the 2023/24 winter season because of a ski/snowboard-related injury. Results: The final database included 579 questionnaires from 579 patients who ultimately entered the study: 285 were females and 294 were males. The analysis of risk factors for fractures revealed that patients with fractures were generally older (50.7 ± 16.0 years) compared to those without fractures (45.4 ± 17.2 years, p = 0.0021). Thirty-six percent of injuries were considered as joint sprain/ligament strain: patients in this group were younger (45.5 ± 16.2 years) compared to all patients (48.3 ± 17.3 years, p = 0.0151). Conclusions: In conclusion, this study identified significant risk factors associated with skiing and snowboarding injuries. Fractures were more common among older and more experienced skiers, particularly those who described themselves as experts. Ligamentous distortions were more common among younger and less experienced skiers. Fatigue is generally underestimated, and the general physical preparation is often lacking for sports like skiing and snowboarding. Additionally, the absence of significant correlations between weather conditions, snow quality, equipment type, and the difficulty of the slope with injury risk suggests that individual factors such as age and skill level are more critical determinants of injury risk than environmental or equipment-related factors.

Cyclops Syndrome, first described by Jackson and Schaefer in 1990, is known as a complication of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However further researches have demonstrated that cyclops can be present even without symptoms and/or in absence of ACLR, simply configuring itself as a lesion in patients with rupture of the native ligament. This is a retrospective cohort study in which we report our experience of 13 cyclops lesions found between 126 patients during a primary arthroscopic ACLR. Preoperative examination with tests of joint stability and range of movement measurement was performed and recorded. Accurate joint examination was performed during arthroscopy and the cyclops lesions found were removed and analyzed with haematoxylin-eosin coloration. Post-operative clinical examination was performed until 6 months of follow-up. Histological analysis showed proliferation of dense fibroelastic polypoid nodules with a macroscopically histological aspects of a “blue eye”, hence the name Cyclops. At 6 months of follow-up after surgery, none of the patients reported pain at terminal extension or instability and they were all able to resume their previous activities. Our study confirmed that surgical reconstruction of the ACL is not the only condition in which the Cyclops Syndrome develops; in fact our histological analysis indicate that the Cyclops lesions develop like a reactive fibroproliferative process following the rupture of the native ACL fibers, as scar reaction to the trauma: for this reason an accurate arthroscopic detection of these Cyclops lesions is crucial during primary ACL reconstruction in order to obtain the best surgical outcomes. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Gait analysis study comparing unicompartmental vs. total knee arthroplasty, differences in knee kinematics: a retrospective cohort study. Background and Objectives: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for advanced knee osteoarthritis, although functional outcomes may remain suboptimal in many patients. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) often provides better functional recovery but shows lower long-term implant survival. Recently, personalized TKA approaches have been developed to improve kinematic restoration and patient satisfaction. This study aimed to compare knee kinematics among patients who underwent personalized TKA, medial UKA, and healthy controls. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 9 patients treated with robotic-assisted personalized TKA, 9 patients treated with medial UKA, and 9 healthy controls matched for age, sex, and BMI. Inclusion criteria were age 60–80 years, Kellgren–Lawrence grade III–IV, a minimum follow-up of 12 months, deviation from neutral HKA < 15°, healthy contralateral knee, and high postoperative functional scores. Exclusion criteria included valgus knees (HKA > 180°), postoperative complications, and neuromotor disorders. In the TKA group, a Medial Congruent implant was implanted with ROSA robotic assistance using a restricted kinematic alignment (±5° HKA) and asymmetric intercompartmental balancing. In the UKA group, a fixed-bearing medial implant (Physica ZUK) was used. Gait analysis was performed on a markerless instrumented treadmill (WalkerView™; Dalmine, Italy). Differences between groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05). Results: UKA patients walked with a stiffer knee during stance. Knee range of motion during stance increased from UKA (6.3° ± 7.2°) to TKA (13.6° ± 8.8°, p = 0.045) and to controls (16.6° ± 4.5°, p = 0.02). During loading response, UKA patients showed lower flexion (10.2° ± 6.1°) than TKA (19.4° ± 7.9°, p = 0.049) and controls (19.6° ± 2.8°, p = 0.004). Knee flexion during swing was comparable between UKA and TKA. Conclusions: UKA patients demonstrated reduced knee flexion during early stance compared with robotic-assisted TKA and healthy controls. The observed differences may reflect multiple factors, including surgical technique, implant design, and patient-related characteristics. Because preoperative functional data were not available, potential selection bias cannot be excluded. These findings should be interpreted cautiously and warrant confirmation in larger prospective studies.