Miguel A. Munguía-Rosas

Dr. Miguel A. Munguía-Rosas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 February 2011 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMiguel A. Munguía-Rosas
Miguel A. Munguía-Rosas
JOJeff Ollerton
Jeff Ollerton
VPVictor Parra-Tabla
Victor Parra-Tabla
JVJosé Arturo de Nova Vázquez
José Arturo de Nova Vázquez
Ecology Letters (2011) 14: 511–521 Abstract Flowering times of plants are important life‐history components and it has previously been hypothesized that flowering phenologies may be currently subject to natural selection or be selectively neutral. In this study we reviewed the evidence for phenotypic selection acting on flowering phenology using ordinary and phylogenetic meta‐analysis. Phenotypic selection exists when a phenotypic trait co‐varies with fitness; therefore, we looked for studies reporting an association between two components of flowering phenology (flowering time or flowering synchrony) with fitness. Data sets comprising 87 and 18 plant species were then used to assess the incidence and strength of phenotypic selection on flowering time and flowering synchrony, respectively. The influence of dependence on pollinators, the duration of the reproductive event, latitude and plant longevity as moderators of selection were also explored. Our results suggest that selection favours early flowering plants, but the strength of selection is influenced by latitude, with selection being stronger in temperate environments. However, there is no consistent pattern of selection on flowering synchrony. Our study demonstrates that phenotypic selection on flowering time is consistent and relatively strong, in contrast to previous hypotheses of selective neutrality, and has implications for the evolution of temperate floras under global climate change.

5 February 2018 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJ. W. Ferry Slik
J. W. Ferry Slik
JFJanet Franklin
Janet Franklin
VAVíctor Arroyo-Rodríguez
Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez
RFRichard Field
Richard Field
SASalomon Aguilar
Salomon Aguilar
Runguo ZangRunguo Zang
Runguo Zang
Significance: Identifying and explaining regional differences in tropical forest dynamics, structure, diversity, and composition are critical for anticipating region-specific responses to global environmental change. Floristic classifications are of fundamental importance for these efforts. Here we provide a global tropical forest classification that is explicitly based on community evolutionary similarity, resulting in identification of five major tropical forest regions and their relationships: ( i ) Indo-Pacific, ( ii ) Subtropical, ( iii ) African, ( iv ) American, and ( v ) Dry forests. African and American forests are grouped, reflecting their former western Gondwanan connection, while Indo-Pacific forests range from eastern Africa and Madagascar to Australia and the Pacific. The connection between northern-hemisphere Asian and American forests is confirmed, while Dry forests are identified as a single tropical biome.

1 April 2013 in Mammalian Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRomeo A. Saldaña-Vázquez
Romeo A. Saldaña-Vázquez
MMMiguel A. Munguía-Rosas
Miguel A. Munguía-Rosas

1 December 2007 in Annals of Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMiguel A. Munguía-Rosas
Miguel A. Munguía-Rosas
VSVinicio J. Sosa
Vinicio J. Sosa
Most studies on cactus recruitment have focused on the role of woody plants as seedling facilitators. Although the spatial association of cacti with objects had been described, the mechanisms underlying this association remain unknown. The aims of this study were to identify which mechanisms facilitate the establishment of a columnar cactus under the shade and protection of objects and to compare these mechanisms with those involved in plant–plant facilitation. Three split-split-plot field experiments were conducted to compare the effects of two microhabitats (inside rocky cavities and beneath plant canopies) on seed removal, germination, seedling survivorship and dry weight. Flat, open spaces were used as the control. For each microhabitat, the effect of seed or seedling protection and substrate limitation were explored; aboveground microclimate and some soil properties were also characterized. The permanence of superficial seeds was greater inside rocky cavities than beneath woody plant canopies or on flat, open areas. Germination was similar in cavities and beneath plant canopies, but significantly higher than on flat, open areas. Seedling survivorship was greater beneath plant canopies than inside cavities or on flat, open spaces. The mechanisms of plant facilitation are different from those of object facilitation. There are seed–seedling conflicts involved in the recruitment of P. leucocephalus: nurse plants favour mainly seedling survivorship by providing a suitable microenvironment, while nurse objects mainly favour seed permanence, by protecting them from predators.

27 October 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMiguel A. Munguía-Rosas
Miguel A. Munguía-Rosas
SMSalvador Montiel
Salvador Montiel
Studies of the effects of patch size and isolation on plant species density have yielded contrasting results. However, much of the available evidence comes from relatively recent anthropogenic forest fragments which have not reached equilibrium between extinction and immigration. This is a critical issue because the theory clearly states that only when equilibrium has been reached can the number of species be accurately predicted by habitat size and isolation. Therefore, species density could be better predicted by patch size and isolation in an ecosystem that has been fragmented for a very long time. We tested whether patch area, isolation and other spatial variables explain variation among forest patches in plant species density in an ecosystem where the forest has been naturally fragmented for long periods of time on a geological scale. Our main predictions were that plant species density will be positively correlated with patch size, and negatively correlated with isolation (distance to the nearest patch, connectivity, and distance to the continuous forest). We surveyed the vascular flora (except lianas and epiphytes) of 19 forest patches using five belt transects (50×4 m each) per patch (area sampled per patch = 0.1 ha). As predicted, plant species density was positively associated (logarithmically) with patch size and negatively associated (linearly) with patch isolation (distance to the nearest patch). Other spatial variables such as patch elevation and perimeter, did not explain among-patch variability in plant species density. The power of patch area and isolation as predictors of plant species density was moderate (together they explain 43% of the variation), however, a larger sample size may improve the explanatory power of these variables. Patch size and isolation may be suitable predictors of long-term plant species density in terrestrial ecosystems that are naturally and anthropogenically fragmented.

1 February 2013 in Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RVRocío Vega-Frutis
Rocío Vega-Frutis
MMMiguel A. Munguía-Rosas
Miguel A. Munguía-Rosas
SVSandra Varga
Sandra Varga
MKMinna-Maarit Kytöviita
Minna-Maarit Kytöviita