To compare short-term release of fluoride ions from ion-releasing dental restorative materials. Seven experimental groups were prepared using the following six different materials: alkasite (Cention Forte), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC), bioactive composite (ACTIVA BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE), fluoride-containing nano-hybrid composite (Luminos UN), coat-free glass hybrid (EQUIA Forte HT), coat-applied glass hybrid (EQUIA Forte HT), and glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX). A total of 40 samples for each group (n=40) were prepared in Teflon molds (8 mm x 2 mm) and placed in polyethylene vials with 5 ml of deionized water. Fluoride release was measured after 6, 24, 48 hours, and for 5 weeks using an ion-selective electrode. The results were expressed in mg/l and the data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA. Significant differences in fluoride release were observed within the first 6 hours (ANOVA p<0.001). EQUIA Forte HT had the highest release, while the other materials showed no significant differences. After 24 hours, EQUIA Forte HT (p<0.001) and Luminos UN (p<0.05) exhibited significantly higher releases, compared to other tested materials. EQUIA Forte HT maintained the highest release at 48 hours (p<0.001), followed by Cention Forte (p<0.05) and Luminos UN (p<0.05). All material pairs showed significant differences in fluoride release at 5 weeks (p<0.001). Coat-free EQUIA Forte HT had the overall highest fluoride release, while Cention Forte demonstrated the greatest increase over time. ACTIVA BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE exhibited the lowest fluoride release in this study.

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of different fluoride-containing toothpastes on fluoride uptake, surface roughness, and microhardness of six ion-releasing restorative dental materials, including glass hybrids (EQUIA Forte HT with and without coating), glass ionomer cements (Fuji IX), resin-modified GICs (Fuji II LC), alkasites (Cention Forte), and ion-releasing composites (Luminos UN and Activa). Specimens were prepared and subjected to a four-day brushing protocol using six toothpastes with varying fluoride formulations (NaF, SnF2, SMFP) and concentrations. Fluoride uptake was assessed by measuring fluoride release using an ion-selective electrode, while surface roughness and microhardness were assessed before and after brushing. Results revealed significant variations in fluoride uptake, with Fuji IX and EQUIA Forte HT showing the highest release, particularly when brushed with NaF-based toothpastes (Duraphat 5000 and 2800). Surface roughness increased post-brushing, with the greatest changes observed in Activa, while microhardness decreased across most materials, except for coated EQUIA Forte HT, which exhibited improved compactness. Resin-based composites, such as Luminos UN and Activa, demonstrated lower fluoride uptake and minimal changes in microhardness compared to GICs. The findings underscore the importance of material composition and toothpaste formulation in influencing fluoride dynamics, surface properties, and mechanical performance of restorative materials.