A potential new bactericide treatment for NiTi orthodontic archwires based in the electrodeposition of silver nanoparticles on the surface was studied. Twenty-five archwires were treated by electrodeposition, obtaining nanoparticles of silver embedded on the archwire surface. These were evaluated in order to investigate the possible changes on the superelastic characteristics (critical temperatures and stresses), the nickel ion release, and the bacteria culture behavior. The chemical composition was analyzed by Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy-microanalysis; the singular temperatures of the martensitic transformation were obtained by a flow calorimeter. Induced martensitic transformation stresses were obtained by mechanical testing apparatus. Nickel ion release was analyzed by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) equipment using artificial saliva solution at 37 °C. Bacterial tests were studied with the most used oral bacterial strains: Streptococcus sanguinis and Lactobacillus salivarius. NiTi samples were immersed in bacterial suspensions for 2 h at 37 °C. Adhered bacteria were separated and seeded on agar plates: Tood-Hewitt (TH) and Man-Rogosa-Sharpe (MRS) for S. sanguinis and for L.salivarius, respectively. These were then incubated at 37 °C for 1 day and the colonies were analyzed. The results showed that the transformation temperatures and the critical stresses have not statistically significant differences. Likewise, nickel ion release at different immersion times in saliva at 37 °C does not present changes between the original and treated with silver nanoparticles archwires. Bacteria culture results showed that the reduction of the bacteria due to the presence to the nanoparticles of silver is higher than 90%. Consequently, the new treatment with nanoparticles of silver could be a good candidate as bactericidic orthodontic archwire.

Background/Objectives: Changes in the mechanical behavior of orthodontic archwires during clinical use are not fully understood, particularly when different bracket systems are employed. Self-ligating (SL) brackets have gained considerable popularity in orthodontic practice in recent years, largely due to claims of improved treatment efficiency and biomechanical performance. Nevertheless, current evidence has not consistently demonstrated statistically significant differences between conventional ligation (CL) brackets and SL systems. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the mechanical properties and degradation over time of nickel-titanium (NiTi) archwires after clinical use in orthodontic treatments performed with CL and SL brackets. Methods: A comparative study was conducted using archwires retrieved from orthodontic patients. Round 0.014-inch NiTi wires (GC Orthodontics America Inc., IL, USA) were analyzed. The archwires were used in 60 patients treated with either CL or SL appliances and evaluated at four time points: before clinical use (T0), and after 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), and 3 months (T3) of intraoral service. Mechanical testing was performed according to ISO 15841:2014 + Amd. 1:2020 using a three-point bending test with a universal testing machine (Z005 Test Control II Universal Testing Machine, Zwick Roell, Kennesaw, GA, USA). The variables analyzed included the mean force delivered by the archwires at deflections of 3 mm (F3), 2 mm (F2), 1 mm (F1), and 0.5 mm (F0.5), as well as the slope of the superelastic plateau at 2 mm, 1 mm, and 0.5 mm. The static and dynamic friction coefficients, as well as the friction forces associated with the wires and the two types of brackets, were determined using a modified MTS-Bionix servo-hydraulic testing machine. The tests were conducted at 37 °C in a saline environment. Results: Both groups showed changes in the superelastic behavior of NiTi archwires. Alterations increased with longer intraoral exposure. In the SL group, significant modifications were already observed after one month of clinical use, with a reduction in the force delivered and a loss of superelastic characteristics. These changes remained relatively stable thereafter, with no statistically significant differences during the following months. In contrast, the CL group showed a progressive reduction in force delivery and superelasticity over time. This is due to the difference in friction between the wire and the CL bracket compared to the SL bracket, which results in greater force transfer for tooth movement. Conclusions: Overall, differences in the mechanical behavior of archwires between CL and SL systems were observed during the initial stages of clinical use. However, these differences diminished over time, and no significant differences were detected after three months. Considering the progressive degradation of mechanical properties, the reuse of archwires that have remained intraorally for more than three months may not be advisable.

Background: Management of skeletal Class III malocclusion of maxillary origin in late adolescence remains challenging, as conventional tooth-borne orthopedic approaches show reduced effectiveness at advanced stages of skeletal maturation. Minimally invasive, bone-anchored alternatives supported by digital workflows may improve clinical feasibility and patient acceptance. Objective: To describe a digitally guided clinical protocol combining a hybrid maxillary expander and supragingival mandibular miniplates, and to explore skeletal and dentoalveolar outcomes in late adolescents. Methods: This retrospective pilot clinical study included ten late adolescents (mean age 16.0 ± 1.3 years; range 13.8–17.7) in advanced skeletal maturation stages (CS4–CS6) with skeletal Class III malocclusion of maxillary origin. Treatment consisted of a hybrid maxillary expander anchored to palatal miniscrews and custom supragingival mandibular miniplates, placed using a fully digital workflow. Maxillary protraction was performed using a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol followed by continuous intermaxillary elastic traction for 12 months. Pre- and post-treatment cephalometric analyses were conducted. Results: A significant increase in SNA was observed (mean +6.1°, p < 0.001), indicating forward maxillary displacement. The Wits appraisal improved by 3.3 mm (p = 0.007), and the SeMax increased by 2.9 mm (p = 0.0013). No significant changes were found in the SNB or mandibular plane angle. Dentoalveolar effects were limited. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this pilot clinical study, the proposed digitally guided protocol demonstrated clinically relevant maxillary advancement with minimal dentoalveolar side effects and preserved vertical control. This relatively minimally invasive approach compared to conventional subgingival miniplates and orthognathic surgery may represent a feasible treatment option for selected late adolescent patients. Further controlled studies are required to confirm these findings.