Lynch syndrome (LS), also known as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), is a hereditary cancer syndrome significantly increasing the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and various extracolonic cancers, including endometrial, ovarian, and gastric cancers. LS results from germline pathogenic variants (GPVs) in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, such as MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, leading to microsatellite instability (MSI). This review explores the multifaceted aspects of LS, covering clinical presentation, genetic underpinnings, and emerging therapeutic strategies. The discussion explores the importance of identifying at-risk individuals, facilitating personalized cancer surveillance and prevention strategies. Molecular insights into distinguishing between sporadic and LS-associated cancers are also examined, with a focus on somatic testing methods, including MSI and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The gynecological cancer risks, particularly those related to endometrial and ovarian malignancies, are addressed, underscoring the need for early detection and risk-reducing interventions. Recent advancements in the management of colorectal and other LS-related cancers are highlighted, with particular attention to the growing role of immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, and immunoprevention strategies. With ongoing advances in our understanding of LS, opportunities for earlier detection, more effective prevention, and innovative treatments continue to expand. This narrative review adopts a multidisciplinary approach to provide a comprehensive understanding of LS, from its genetic basis to current clinical and therapeutic practices, with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes and enhancing the quality of care.

We present a hereditary coproporphyria patient with acute psychiatric symptoms and skin lesions initially misdiagnosed with schizoaffective disorder and later developed hyperactive delirium and atrial fibrillation requiring intensive care unit admission. He recovered after administering glucose infusions and the discontinuation of porphyrinogenic medications.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between metabolic tumor heterogeneity indices in patients with driver mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer, with a particular focus on the impact of heterogeneity indices on prognostic outcomes.

Background and Objectives: Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and inflammation-based indices have recently gained attention as potential prognostic markers of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of metabolic and systemic inflammatory parameters in predicting treatment response, relapse, and overall survival (OS) in patients with DLBCL. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 70 patients with DLBCL. Clinical characteristics, laboratory values, and metabolic parameters, including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax^liver and SUVmax), heterogeneity indices HI1 and HI2, and MTV were analyzed. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests. Receiver operating characteristic analyses helped evaluate the diagnostic performance of the selected biomarkers in predicting relapse and mortality. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the independent predictors. Results: The mean OS and mean relapse-free survival (RFS) were 71.6 ± 7.4 and 38.7 ± 2.9 months, respectively. SUVmax^liver ≤ 22 and HI2 > 62.3 were associated with a significantly shorter OS. High lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels and HI2 > 87.9 were significantly associated with a reduced RFS. LDH, SUVmax^liver, and HI2 had a significant predictive value for relapse. SUVmax^liver and HI2 levels were also predictive of mortality; SUVmax^liver ≤ 22 and HI2 > 62.3 independently predicted mortality, while HI2 > 87.9 independently predicted relapse. MTV was not significantly associated with survival. Conclusions: Metabolic tumor burden and inflammation-based markers, particularly SUVmax^liver and HI2, are significant prognostic indicators of DLBCL and may enhance risk stratification and aid in identifying patients with an increased risk of relapse or mortality, potentially guiding personalized therapy.