Petr Konvalina

Dr. Petr Konvalina

University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Agriculture
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 November 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mohammad GhorbaniMohammad Ghorbani
Mohammad Ghorbani
Elnaz AmirahmadiElnaz Amirahmadi
Elnaz Amirahmadi
Reinhard NeugschwandtnerReinhard Neugschwandtner
Reinhard Neugschwandtner
PKPetr Konvalina
Petr Konvalina
MKMarek Kopecky
Marek Kopecky
Yves Theoneste MurindangaboYves Theoneste Murindangabo
Yves Theoneste Murindangabo
Soil structure is a crucial constituent influencing soil organic richness, rooting systems, and soil moisture conservation. Adding biochar to the soil, which directly affects aggregation, can significantly alter the soil moisture status. The extent of this impact is influenced by the temperature at which pyrolysis biochar is formed. The impact of biochar derived from wheat straw made at 350, 450, 550, and 650 °C (B350, B450, B550, B650) on soil aggregation and moisture retention was evaluated in this study. Based on the results, B550 had the largest mean weight diameter, most water-stable aggregates, and highest available water content compared to the control, with increases of 235%, 39% and 166% compared to the control. On the other hand, B350 was identified as the weakest treatment, with no significant difference from the control. Using B550 and B650 significantly reduced the soil bulk density by 13% and 12% compared to the control. Therefore, the formation of micro-aggregates, the development of soil porosity, and the subsequent increase in soil available water are unavoidable during the addition of B550. The change in the hydrophilic character of biochar and the attainment of an optimal oxygen/carbon ratio with pyrolysis degradations is a critical factor in soil hydrology issues.


Mohammad GhorbaniMohammad Ghorbani
Mohammad Ghorbani
PKPetr Konvalina
Petr Konvalina
Anna WalkiewiczAnna Walkiewicz
Anna Walkiewicz
Reinhard NeugschwandtnerReinhard Neugschwandtner
Reinhard Neugschwandtner
MKMarek Kopecky
Marek Kopecky
Daniel G BucurDaniel G Bucur
Daniel G Bucur
Sewage sludge (SS) has been connected to a variety of global environmental problems. Assessing the risk of various disposal techniques can be quite useful in recommending appropriate management. The preparation of sewage sludge biochar (SSB) and its impacts on soil characteristics, plant health, nutrient leaching, and greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) are critically reviewed in this study. Comparing the features of SSB obtained at various pyrolysis temperatures revealed changes in its elemental content. Lower hydrogen/carbon ratios in SSB generated at higher pyrolysis temperatures point to the existence of more aromatic carbon molecules. Additionally, the preparation of SSB has an increased ash content, a lower yield, and a higher surface area as a result of the rise in pyrolysis temperature. The worldwide potential of SS output and CO2-equivalent emissions in 2050 were predicted as factors of global population and common disposal management in order to create a futuristic strategy and cope with the quantity of abundant global SS. According to estimations, the worldwide SS output and associated CO2-eq emissions were around 115 million tons dry solid (Mt DS) and 14,139 teragrams (Tg), respectively, in 2020. This quantity will rise to about 138 Mt DS sewage sludge and 16985 Tg CO2-eq emissions in 2050, a 20% increase. In this regard, developing and populous countries may support economic growth by utilizing low-cost methods for producing biochar and employing it in local agriculture. To completely comprehend the benefits and drawbacks of SSB as a soil supplement, further study on long-term field applications of SSB is required.

4 September 2022 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mohammad GhorbaniMohammad Ghorbani
Mohammad Ghorbani
PKPetr Konvalina
Petr Konvalina
Reinhard NeugschwandtnerReinhard Neugschwandtner
Reinhard Neugschwandtner
MKMarek Kopecky
Marek Kopecky
Elnaz AmirahmadiElnaz Amirahmadi
Elnaz Amirahmadi
Anna WalkiewiczAnna Walkiewicz
Anna Walkiewicz
Chemical nitrogen (N) fertilizers are regarded as one of the environmental contaminants in addition to the necessity for fossil sources for their production. Conversely, it is impossible to neglect the supply of nitrogen needed as one of the essential ingredients for plant function. For organic agriculture, it is crucial to use alternative fertilizer management to reduce the harmful impacts and production costs of chemical fertilizers. In a one-year pot experiment, nitrate (NO−3) leaching and nitrogen efficiency of wheat were examined in relation to biochar (B) mixed with urea (U), legume residues (L), and azocompost (A), which represent chemical, green, and biological sources of N-fertilizers, respectively. Control (no biochar, no fertilizer), U (46 kg ha−1), A (5 t ha−1), L (5 t ha−1), B (10 t ha−1), UB, AB, and LB were the experimental treatments. Grain yield of wheat was enhanced by 337% and 312% with UB and UL, respectively. The LB produced the highest grain N yield, with a rise of 8.8 times over the control. L had the highest N-use efficiency, with an increase of 149% over the control. The highest N-harvest index and N-recovery efficiency were obtained by using LB, with values of 91 and 70 %, respectively. Nitrate leaching occurred in the following order: U > Control ≥ A ≥ L > UB > AB ≥ LB > B. Nitrogen is retained for the plant in the extensive specific surface of biochar when N-fertilizers are used in conjunction with them. This not only improves N-efficiency but also minimizes nitrogen loss through leaching. Additionally, the soil can benefit from the addition of leguminous organic fertilizer in a similar way as to urea fertilizer in terms of increasing wheat grain yield, particularly when combined with biochar.

2 November 2022 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mohammad GhorbaniMohammad Ghorbani
Mohammad Ghorbani
Elnaz AmirahmadiElnaz Amirahmadi
Elnaz Amirahmadi
PKPetr Konvalina
Petr Konvalina
JJJan Moudrý Jr.
Jan Moudrý Jr.
JBJan Bárta
Jan Bárta
Roxana Dana BucurRoxana Dana Bucur
Roxana Dana Bucur
Biochar and zeolite, due to their porous structure, are supposed to be appropriate soil amendments especially in agricultural areas with a lack of water or unsuitable soils with coarse texture. Two soil additions that are intended to assist an increase soil water content (AWC) are biochar and zeolite. With this aim, the effects of biochar and zeolite at two levels of 5 and 10 t ha−1 (known as B5, B10, Z5, and Z10) on soil hydrological properties and consequently corn growth were investigated in this study. The results showed that the application of B5 and B10 significantly improved AWC by 76% and 48% due to increasing soil micro- and meso-pores. The application of Z5 and Z10, associated with an increase of macro-pores in soil, enhanced saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) up to 174% and 303% and caused losses. The highest specific surface area and mean weight diameter in soil obtained from B10 had an increase of 171% and 197% over the control. Biochar treatments considerably affected plant growth features and shoot nutrient content, whilst zeolite treatments had an impact that is much less apparent than that of biochar. Observations indicate that biochar greatly boosted nutrient availability and water retention in the soil by raising the share of micro- and mezzo-pores, respectively, and as a result, has benefited plant growth. Increasing the level of biochar application from 5 to 10% would have more positive effects on the water available in the soil and on plant root systems. In contrast, the high rate of application of zeolite particles due to coarseness and adding Na+ ions to the soil caused the dispersion of soil particles, the destruction of soil structure, increasing Ks and water loss and consequently a reduction in plant growth.

29 November 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Elnaz AmirahmadiElnaz Amirahmadi
Elnaz Amirahmadi
JJJan Moudrý Jr.
Jan Moudrý Jr.
PKPetr Konvalina
Petr Konvalina
SHStefan Josef Hörtenhuber
Stefan Josef Hörtenhuber
Mohammad GhorbaniMohammad Ghorbani
Mohammad Ghorbani
MKMarek Kopecky
Marek Kopecky
The rising demand for agricultural products and expanding public awareness of environmental friendliness have led to the adoption of the organic farming system rather than the conventional one. The life cycle assessment (LCA) concept is a frequently used method to examine the environmental impacts of any activity across its entire life cycle. This research is the first use of LCA for the impacts of vermicompost and cattle manure as organic fertilizers in rice farming. The main goal of this study was to compare the environmental impacts of conventional and organic rice farming. This paper uses midpoint attributional LCA to analyze environmental damages during rice production. The four primary harm categories used in this strategy to categorize the environmental effects were: (1) climate change, (2) human health, (3) ecosystem quality, and (4) resources. The inventory data for the agricultural stage were obtained through farmer interviews. The system boundaries were set to cradle to farm gate, and 1 ton of final product (dry matter) was used as the functional unit. The results show that in all main damage categories, except for particulate matter formation, stratospheric ozone depletion, mineral resource scarcity, and freshwater eutrophication, conventional rice production has higher environmental impacts than organic rice production. Overall, organic rice production is more effective in diminishing the negative environmental effects of farming compared to conventional rice production.