BACKGROUND Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises 85% of lung cancers with poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly nivolumab, show survival benefits in advanced NSCLC. The effect of body mass index (BMI) on immunotherapy outcomes remains controversial. This study investigated the relationship between BMI and treatment outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis at Aydın Adnan Menderes University included 300 metastatic NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab between January 2020 and March 2025. Patients under age 18 years, lacking pathology confirmation, receiving combination therapies, or with BMI <18.5, were excluded. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), treatment response, and toxicity. BMI was categorized as <25 kg/m² and ≥25 kg/m². Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Of 300 patients, 53.3% had BMI 0.05). PD-L1 expression≥50% was associated with reduced progression risk. ECOG PS ≥2, age >65, and liver metastases negatively impacted survival. An increased number of nivolumab cycles improved OS and PFS. The objective response rate was 31.6%. Common adverse events were fatigue (25%), nausea (23.7%), and hypothyroidism (18%), without BMI-related variation. CONCLUSIONS The study found no evidence supporting BMI as a prognostic factor for OS or PFS in advanced NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab. ECOG PS ≥2 and older age were poor prognosis indicators. BMI should be evaluated as a continuous variable. Further studies are needed to clarify obesity's role in immunotherapy responses.

Background and Objectives: In early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) has been adopted as the preferred adjuvant approach for patients left with residual invasive disease despite neoadjuvant therapy. The influence of different neoadjuvant regimens on subsequent outcomes in real-world settings remains uncertain. Materials and Methods: From 2019 to 2025, 102 patients treated with adjuvant T-DM1 following surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively assessed. Neoadjuvant regimens included doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by trastuzumab-paclitaxel, doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide with pertuzumab–trastuzumab–docetaxel, or docetaxel–carboplatin–trastuzumab–pertuzumab. Clinical features, treatment response, survival, and toxicity were evaluated. Results: The mean age of the cohort was 49.7 years, and the majority of patients (80.4%) were aged 40 years or older. Hormone receptor positivity was 82.0%, and invasive ductal carcinoma accounted for 97.1% of cases. Regional responses included 39.2% with axillary pCR despite residual breast lesions, and 5.9% with breast pCR accompanied by axillary disease. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated disease-free survival rates of 100%, 95.2%, and 92.2% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Adverse events were predominantly grade 1–2, while grade 3–4 toxicities occurred in under 5% of the cohort. Baseline characteristics varied across regimens, reflecting real-world treatment preferences, but survival outcomes remained comparable. Conclusions: Adjuvant T-DM1 was associated with high survival rates and manageable toxicity across different neoadjuvant regimens, underscoring its consistent benefit in routine clinical practice.

Background: Reliable biomarkers that capture tumor–host interactions and predict treatment resistance in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remain limited. We evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of the pretreatment lactate dehydrogenase-to-albumin ratio (LAR), an integrative biomarker reflecting metabolic activity, systemic inflammation, and host nutritional status. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients with extensive-stage SCLC treated at five tertiary centers between 2016 and 2024. Pretreatment LAR was calculated using baseline serum lactate dehydrogenase and albumin levels and dichotomized using a Youden index-derived cut-off at the 12-month overall survival (OS) horizon. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses using inverse probability weighting were performed to assess discriminative performance. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. Associations with platinum resistance and lack of objective treatment benefit (defined as progressive disease as best response) were examined using logistic regression models. Results: A total of 223 patients were included. Elevated LAR was associated with inferior OS (median, 15.8 vs. 25.2 months; log-rank p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (7.9 vs. 11.5 months; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, LAR remained independently associated with OS (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.04–1.95; p = 0.028). LAR demonstrated modest but consistently superior discriminative performance compared with other inflammatory indices for both 12-month OS (area under the curve [AUC], 0.692) and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) (AUC, 0.646), with statistically significant differences in DeLong comparisons. Higher LAR was independently associated with increased odds of platinum resistance (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.31; 95% CI, 1.41–3.81; p = 0.001) and lack of objective treatment benefit (adjusted OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.33–3.14; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Pretreatment LAR is a clinically accessible and biologically integrative biomarker associated with survival and treatment resistance in extensive-stage SCLC. By capturing tumor–host interactions, LAR may support risk stratification and identify patients at increased risk of early treatment failure. Prospective validation is warranted to define its role in biomarker-driven clinical decision-making.

Chemotherapy induced alopecia (CIA) is one of the most common side effects in cancer patients, however; it doesn't have an effective pharmacological treatment yet. In this study we aimed to research the protective effect of newly developed HDDPiW-jSB solution on docetaxel (DTX) -induced rat alopecia model. Docetaxel (10 mg/kg/week) was administered to the 6-8 months old rats for three weeks. HDDPiW-jSB solution was applied once or twice a week for 4 weeks beginning prior to one week before DTX. Rat hair follicles were evaluated with hematoxylin-eosin and immune-histochemical staining. In the first stage of this study, alopecia was successfully developed by DTX (10 mg/kg/three times) application. In the second stage of the study, application of HDDPiW-jSB solution, did not change the study parameters significantly on control group. The solution improved the anagen hair follicle count and Bcl-2 levels in the skin samples of DTX-induced alopecic rat groups, especially when applied twice weekly. Additionally, level of Caspase 3 was decreased. HDDPiW-jSB solution was safe when applied on the skin. Topical HDDPiW-jSB solution could be effective and safe for the protection of DTX-induced alopecia in rat models.

Background: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been established as a first-line maintenance therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) following platinum-based chemotherapy. While phase III trials have demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefits with olaparib and niraparib, real-world data remain limited. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter real-world study included 179 patients with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian treated with first-line maintenance olaparib or niraparib across 33 centers in Türkiye between January 2014 and March 2025. Clinical, pathological, and molecular data—including BRCA (Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene) mutation status, origin, and variant classification—was collected. The primary endpoint was PFS, and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier methods. Results: Of 179 patients, 110 received olaparib and 69 received niraparib. BRCA mutations were present in 88.3% of patients, while 11.7% had unknown HRD status. Median follow-up was 16.5 months, and median PFS was not reached. Estimated PFS rates for the overall cohort were 91.0% at 6 months, 83.0% at 12 months, and 64.0% at 24 months. In the olaparib cohort, BRCA-mutant patients demonstrated PFS rates of 89%, 78%, 73%, and 64% at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. In the niraparib cohort, corresponding PFS rates among BRCA-mutant patients were 87% at 6 months and 75% at 12 months. Patients harboring pathogenic BRCA variants experienced longer PFS compared with those with likely pathogenic variants. Any-grade adverse events occurred in 73.7% of patients, and grade 3–4 events in 29.6%, with hematologic toxicities predominating. Dose interruptions were more frequent with niraparib, while treatment discontinuation rates were low in both groups. No cases of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia were observed. Conclusions: In this large multicenter real-world cohort, first-line maintenance therapy with olaparib and niraparib provided durable PFS benefit in patients with advanced EOC, particularly among those with pathogenic BRCA mutations, confirming their effectiveness and manageable safety profiles in routine clinical practice.