Pedro J. Benito

Prof. Pedro J. Benito

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
ALANA RODRIGUEZ LARRAD
ANA RODRIGUEZ LARRAD
Asier MañasAsier Mañas
Asier Mañas
Idoia LabayenIdoia Labayen
Idoia Labayen
Marcela Gonzalez-GrossMarcela Gonzalez-Gross
Marcela Gonzalez-Gross
Ander EspinAnder Espin
Ander Espin
Jon IrazustaJon Irazusta
Jon Irazusta
During the COVID-19 pandemic, entire populations were instructed to live in home-confinement to prevent the expansion of the disease. Spain was one of the countries with the strictest conditions, as outdoor physical activity was banned for nearly two months. This study aimed to analyse the changes in physical activity and sedentary behaviours in Spanish university students before and during the confinement by COVID-19 with special focus on gender. We also analysed enjoyment, the tools used and motivation and impediments for doing physical activity. An online questionnaire, which included the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form and certain “ad hoc” questions, was designed. Students were recruited by distributing an invitation through the administrative channels of 16 universities and a total of 13,754 valid surveys were collected. Overall, university students reduced moderate (−29.5%) and vigorous (−18.3%) physical activity during the confinement and increased sedentary time (+52.7%). However, they spent more time on high intensity interval training (HIIT) (+18.2%) and mind-body activities (e.g., yoga) (+80.0%). Adaptation to the confinement, in terms of physical activity, was handled better by women than by men. These results will help design strategies for each gender to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour during confinement periods.

PBPedro J. Benito
Pedro J. Benito
RCRocío Cupeiro
Rocío Cupeiro
Domingo J. Ramos-CampoDomingo J. Ramos-Campo
Domingo J. Ramos-Campo
Pedro E. AlcarazPedro E. Alcaraz
Pedro E. Alcaraz
Jacobo Á. Rubio-AriasJacobo Á. Rubio-Arias
Jacobo Á. Rubio-Arias
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to study all published clinical trial interventions, determined the magnitude of whole-body hypertrophy in humans (healthy males) and observed the individual responsibility of each variable in muscle growth after resistance training (RT). Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from database inception until 10 May 2018 for original articles assessing the effects of RT on muscle size after interventions of more than 2 weeks of duration. Specifically, we obtain the variables fat-free mass (FMM), lean muscle mass (LMM) and skeletal muscle mass (SMM). The effects on outcomes were expressed as mean differences (MD) and a random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regressions determined covariates (age, weight, height, durations in weeks…) to explore the moderate effect related to the participants and characteristics of training. One hundred and eleven studies (158 groups, 1927 participants) reported on the effects of RT for muscle mass. RT significantly increased muscle mass (FFM+LMM+SMM; Δ1.53 kg; 95% CI [1.30, 1.76], p < 0.001; I2 = 0%, p = 1.00). Considering the overall effects of the meta-regression, and taking into account the participants’ characteristics, none of the studied covariates explained any effect on changes in muscle mass. Regarding the training characteristics, the only significant variable that explained the variance of the hypertrophy was the sets per workout, showing a significant negative interaction (MD; estimate: 1.85, 95% CI [1.45, 2.25], p < 0.001; moderator: -0.03 95% CI [−0.05, −0.001] p = 0.04). In conclusion, RT has a significant effect on the improvement of hypertrophy (~1.5 kg). The excessive sets per workout affects negatively the muscle mass gain.

1 September 2010 in Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RCRocío Cupeiro
Rocío Cupeiro
PBPedro J. Benito
Pedro J. Benito
NMNicola Maffulli
Nicola Maffulli
FCF. Javier Calderón
F. Javier Calderón
Domingo González-LamuñoDomingo González-Lamuño
Domingo González-Lamuño
Monocarboxylate Transporter 1 (MCT1) mediates the transport of the main fraction of lactate across the sarcolemma. A common polymorphic MCT1 variant has been identified, but its role in high intensity exercise performance has not been defined. We investigated the influence of MCT1 A1470T polymorphism (rs1049434) on lactate accumulation after high intensity circuit training. Ten men aged 20-26 performed three controlled circuit training (CWT) sessions at 60%, 70%, and 80% of the 15 repetition maximum (15RM), in non-consecutive days. CWT included three sets of a circuit of eight exercises, obtaining lactate measurements immediately after each set had been completed. Two independent variables were analysed: MTC1 genotypes according to the presence or absence of the A1470T polymorphism, and the intensity of circuit training. Genotype distributions were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, being 30% wild-type, 50% heterozygotes, and 20% mutated homozygotes. Mean lactate concentration at 80% of 15RM were significantly higher than the mean lactate values at the other intensities (p<0.01). Significant differences between genetic groups were found in the lactate accumulation slope at 80% of 15RM (p=0.02) and in the maximal lactate concentration reached by all subjects in the study (L(max)) (p=0.03). The carriers of the A1470T polymorphism in the MTC1 gene seem to exhibit a worse lactate transport capability into the less active muscle cells for oxidation.

20 May 2011 in Journal of Sports Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRManuel Rabadán
Manuel Rabadán
VDVíctor Díaz
Víctor Díaz
FCFrancisco J. Calderón
Francisco J. Calderón
PBPedro J. Benito
Pedro J. Benito
Ana PeinadoAna Peinado
Ana Peinado
Nicola MaffulliNicola Maffulli
Nicola Maffulli
The aim of this study was to determine which physiological variables predict excellence in middle- and long-distance runners. Forty middle-distance runners (age 23 ± 4 years, body mass 67.2 ± 5.9 kg, stature 1.80 ± 0.05 m, [Vdot]O2max 65.9 ± 4.5 ml · kg−1 · min−1) and 32 long-distance runners (age 25 ± 4 years, body mass 59.8 ± 5.1 kg, stature 1.73 ± 0.06 m, [Vdot]O2max 71.6 ± 5.0 ml · kg−1 · min−1) competing at international standard performed an incremental running test to exhaustion. Expired gas analysis was performed breath-by-breath and maximum oxygen uptake ([Vdot]O2max) and two ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2) were calculated. Long-distance runners presented a higher [Vdot]O2max than middle-distance runners when expressed relative to body mass (P < 0.001, d = 1.18, 95% CI [0.68, 1.68]). At the intensities corresponding to VT1 and VT2, long-distance runners showed higher values for [Vdot]O2 expressed relative to body mass or %[Vdot]O2max, speed and oxygen cost of running (P < 0.05). When oxygen uptake was adjusted for body mass, differences between groups were consistent. Logistic binary regression analysis showed that [Vdot]O2max (expressed as l · min−1 and ml · kg−1 · min−1), [Vdot]O2VT2 (expressed as ml · kg−0.94 · min−1), and speed at VT2 (v VT2) categorized long-distance runners. In addition, the multivariate model correctly classified 84.7% of the athletes. Thus, [Vdot]O2max, [Vdot]O2VT2, and v VT2 discriminate between elite middle-distance and long-distance runners.

5 April 2011 in European Journal of Applied Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MZMikel Zabala
Mikel Zabala
Ana PeinadoAna Peinado
Ana Peinado
FCFrancisco J. Calderón
Francisco J. Calderón
JSJavier Sampedro
Javier Sampedro
MGManuel Joaquin Castillo Garzon
Manuel Joaquin Castillo Garzon
PBPedro J. Benito
Pedro J. Benito

26 February 2015
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RARaquel Aparicio-Ugarriza
Raquel Aparicio-Ugarriza
Juan Mielgo-AyusoJuan Mielgo-Ayuso
Juan Mielgo-Ayuso
PBPedro J. Benito
Pedro J. Benito
RPRaquel Pedrero-Chamizo
Raquel Pedrero-Chamizo
IAIgnacio Ara
Ignacio Ara
EGEXERNET Study Group
EXERNET Study Group