Marina García Selva

Dr. Marina García Selva

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Rubén Agustín PanaderoRubén Agustín Panadero
Rubén Agustín Panadero
IBIrene Bermúdez-Mulet
Irene Bermúdez-Mulet
LFLucia Fernandez-Estevan
Lucia Fernandez-Estevan
MSMª Fernanda Sola-Ruiz
Mª Fernanda Sola-Ruiz
RMRocío Marco-Pitarch
Rocío Marco-Pitarch
RLRaquel León-Martinez
Raquel León-Martinez
Introduction: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the radiographic peri-implant bone loss of bone level implants and tissue level implants with a convergent neck in screw-retained single crowns and in screw-retained fixed partial prostheses, after two years of functional loading. Materials and methods: The sample was divided into two groups according to their type: Group I: supracrestal implants with convergent transmucosal neck; Group II: crestal implants. In each group we distinguish two subgroups according to the type of prosthetic restoration: single crowns and a three-piece fixed partial prosthesis on two implants. To quantify bone loss, parallelized periapical radiographs were analyzed at the time of implant placement and after two years of functional load. Results: A total of 120 implants were placed in 53 patients. After statistical analysis it was observed that for each type of implant bone loss was 0.97 ± 0.91 mm for bone level and 0.31 ± 0.48 mm for tissue level. No significant differences were found regarding the type of prosthesis and the location (maxilla or mandible) of the implants. Conclusions: Tissue level implants with a convergent transepithelial neck exhibit less peri-implant bone loss than bone level implants regardless of the type of prosthesis.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CBCarla Fons Badal
Carla Fons Badal
Rubén Agustín PanaderoRubén Agustín Panadero
Rubén Agustín Panadero
CLCARLOS LABAIG
CARLOS LABAIG
MSMª Fernanda Sola-Ruiz
Mª Fernanda Sola-Ruiz
MSMarina García Selva
Marina García Selva
AFAntonio Fons Font
Antonio Fons Font
Objective: The main objective of this study aimed to evaluate the response to treatment in implants with peri-implantitis regarding the presence or absence of keratinized mucosa. Materials and Methods: One hundred implants with peri-implantitis were treated non-surgically at the Prosthodontics and Occlusion Teaching Unit of the University of Valencia. Records were registered at day zero (recession, bleeding on probing, suppuration, probing depth, bone loss and plaque index), at 1, 3 and 6 months. Results: In both groups, a slight increase in recession and disappearance of suppuration took place, and no bone loss was observed during the following 6 months. However, after an initial reduction, probing depth, bleeding on probing and plaque index increased again in the group without keratinized mucosa (KM). Conclusions: Implants with KM presented better results after non-surgical treatment as well as in their medium-term evolution, although it would be advisable to increase the number of samples in order to achieve greater scientific evidence and standardization in the treatment protocol. Clinical relevance: The role of keratinized mucosa in the development of peri-implantitis has been mentioned in many publications, but less has been emphasized regarding its influence on the success of the treatment of this pathology. The presence of keratinized mucosa has been found to play a key role in the evolution of the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. The amount of keratinized mucosa should be considered in the treatment of peri-implantitis, as well as when planning connective tissue grafts accompanying the decontamination of implants in the absence of keratinized mucosa.

11 November 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sara Camañes-GonzalvoSara Camañes-Gonzalvo
Sara Camañes-Gonzalvo
RPROCIO MARCO PITARCH
ROCIO MARCO PITARCH
APAndrés Plaza-Espín
Andrés Plaza-Espín
FPF Javier Puertas
F Javier Puertas
Rubén Agustín PanaderoRubén Agustín Panadero
Rubén Agustín Panadero
MSMarina García Selva
Marina García Selva
Background. The effectiveness of mandibular advancement devices has been solidly demonstrated in the past. They are considered a valid alternative treatment to continuous positive airway pressure for patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Nevertheless, the relationship between polysomnographic parameters and the increase in the volume of the upper airway in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome has not been clearly established so far. This study aimed to determine the impact of these oral appliances upon the volume of the airway after the device titration phase and correlate it with the degree of mandibular advancement and the improvement of polysomnographic parameters. Methods. All patients were diagnosed by polysomnography and were treated with a customized, titratable mandibular advancement device. Three-dimensional volumetric measurements were performed using cone beam computed tomography. Results. The present study included 45 patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (mild in 23 patients, moderate in 11 and severe in 11). Forty-four percent of the patients presented with an apnea hypopnea index <5/h at the end of treatment. The volume of the upper airway increased an average of 4.3 ± 5.9 cm3, this represents a percentage increase of 20.9%, which was significantly correlated with an apnea hypopnea index and a minimum oxygen saturation improvement. Conclusions. The mandibular advancement device used was found to be effective in improving polysomnographic parameters. Moreover, the oral appliance was able to significantly increase the tridimensional dimensions of the upper airway. Moreover, this finding was correlated with a reduction in the apnea hypopnea index (p = 0.007) and an increase on minimum oxygen saturation (p = 0.033).

21 September 2024 in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Sara Camañes-GonzalvoSara Camañes-Gonzalvo
Sara Camañes-Gonzalvo
RPROCIO MARCO PITARCH
ROCIO MARCO PITARCH
MSMarina García Selva
Marina García Selva
CBCarlos Bellot-Arcis
Carlos Bellot-Arcis
Vanessa Paredes-GallardoVanessa Paredes-Gallardo
Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo
JMJosé María Montiel-Company
José María Montiel-Company

MCMaría Costa Castillo
María Costa Castillo
MMMartín Laguna Martos
Martín Laguna Martos
RPROCIO MARCO PITARCH
ROCIO MARCO PITARCH
MSMarina García Selva
Marina García Selva
SCSilvia Del Cid
Silvia Del Cid
Rubén Agustín PanaderoRubén Agustín Panadero
Rubén Agustín Panadero
Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the peri-implant bone loss of infracrestal, supracrestal, and crestal implants from the day of placement and up to 1 year of prosthetic loading. Material and methods: A retrospective clinical study was carried out. The sample consisted of 30 implants placed on 30 patients. It was divided into three groups: infracrestal (n = 10), crestal (n = 10), and supracrestal (n = 10) implants. Results: Following the statistical analysis, it was observed that, 4 months after implant placement, the mean values of total peri-implant bone loss were 0.04 mm in infracrestal implants, 0.26 mm in crestal implants, and 0.19 mm in supracrestal implants. At the end of one year of prosthetic loading, the peri-implant bone loss was 0.12 mm in infracrestal implants, 1.04 mm in crestal implants, and 0.27 mm in supracrestal implants. It was determined that peri-implant bone loss in crestal implants was significantly higher than in supracrestal implants, and these in turn were significantly higher than in infracrestal implants. Conclusions: The implants that obtained a better biological behavior on peri-implant bone tissue were the infracrestal implants with a converging transmucosal abutment.

24 January 2025 in Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Sara Camañes-GonzalvoSara Camañes-Gonzalvo
Sara Camañes-Gonzalvo
JMJosé María Montiel-Company
José María Montiel-Company
MSMarina García Selva
Marina García Selva
APAndrés Plaza‐Espín
Andrés Plaza‐Espín
TPTomàs Pérez‐Carbonell
Tomàs Pérez‐Carbonell
RPROCIO MARCO PITARCH
ROCIO MARCO PITARCH
Objectives: This non‐randomised clinical study aimed to identify the phenotypic characteristics that distinguish responders from non‐responders. Additionally, it sought to establish a predictive model for treatment response to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) using mandibular advancement devices (MAD), based on the analysed phenotypic characteristics.Material and Methods: This study, registered under identifier NCT05596825, prospectively analysed MAD treatment over 6 years using two‐piece adjustable appliances according to a standardised protocol. Two response definitions aligned with the latest International Consensus Statement on OSA severity were established. Logistic regression and CHAID models integrated baseline clinical, anthropometric, cephalometric anatomical, soft tissue characteristics and physiological upper airway variables.Results: A total of 112 patients completed the study: 64 responders and 48 non‐responders according to response definition 1, and 81 responders and 31 non‐responders according to response definition 2. Responders to MAD treatment had lower body mass index (BMI), neck and waist circumference, Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores, apnoea–hypopnea index (AHI), snoring intensity on the Visual Analog Scale, CPAP pressure, and higher T90% and minSaO2. Patients exhibiting greater anatomical imbalance, smaller airway volume, smaller minimum cross‐sectional area (CSAmin) and longer airway length demonstrated a poorer response to treatment.Conclusions: Airway length, initial T90% and anterior facial height collectively formed a highly predictive logistic regression model for response definition 1. Jarabak's ratio, gonial angle, CSAmin, airway length, initial BMI and baseline AHI constituted a highly predictive model for the second response definition. Furthermore, the CHAID regression tree established cutoff values for the variables that form the predictive models.