Background/Objectives: Occupational justice has expanded conceptually and empirically over the past two decades, addressing inequalities related to health, participation, and rights. However, there has been no comprehensive bibliometric analysis of its global scientific output. The objective of this study was to analyze evolution, distribution, editorial structure, collaboration networks, and thematic domains of the literature on occupational justice, using classical bibliometric laws and scientific mapping techniques. Methods: A bibliometric study was conducted on 238 articles and reviews indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection (1982–2026), retrieved using the subject equation TS=(occupational NEAR/0 justice). The laws of Price (growth), Lotka (prolific authors), Bradford (journal dispersion), and Zipf (semantic concentration) were applied. Scientific mapping was performed using co-authorship and co-occurrence analysis from Keywords Plus® via VOSviewer. Results: Scientific output showed exponential growth (R² = 87.29%), with an acceleration beginning in 2015 and thematic diversification between 2021 and 2026. The geographic distribution revealed a marked centrality of the Global North, along with the emergence of research hubs in the Global South. Just ten journals accounted for 75% of the output, forming a robust editorial nucleus. Co-authorship networks revealed three transnational clusters and bridge authors who facilitate the circulation of knowledge. The thematic map identified three interdependent macro-clusters: health and well-being, occupational practice and science, and justice and rights. Conclusions: Bibliometrics highlights the rapid expansion and editorial concentration of occupational justice, identifies geographic and thematic gaps, and proposes new agendas in digital, environmental, and decolonial fields. Although limited by its sources and methods, it helps guide priorities for more inclusive research, policies, training, and interventions.