Muhamad Ali Muhammad Yuzir

Muhamad Ali Muhammad Yuzir


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2018 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Hengky SalimHengky Salim
Hengky Salim
RPRory Padfield
Rory Padfield
SHSune Balle Hansen
Sune Balle Hansen
SMShaza Eva Mohamad
Shaza Eva Mohamad
MYMuhamad Ali Muhammad Yuzir
Muhamad Ali Muhammad Yuzir
EPEffie Papargyropoulou
Effie Papargyropoulou

1 November 2020 in Environmental Technology & Innovation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LPLaila Dina Amalia Purba
Laila Dina Amalia Purba
HIHamzat Tijani Ibiyeye
Hamzat Tijani Ibiyeye
MYMuhamad Ali Muhammad Yuzir
Muhamad Ali Muhammad Yuzir
SMShaza Eva Mohamad
Shaza Eva Mohamad
KIKoji Iwamoto
Koji Iwamoto
NANorhayati Abdullah
Norhayati Abdullah

1 January 2013 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Norhayati AbdullahNorhayati Abdullah
Norhayati Abdullah
MYMuhamad Ali Muhammad Yuzir
Muhamad Ali Muhammad Yuzir
TCThomas P. Curtis
Thomas P. Curtis
AYAdibah Yahya
Adibah Yahya
ZUZaini Ujang
Zaini Ujang

1 April 2011 in Desalination
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSHREESHIVADASAN CHELLIAPAN
SHREESHIVADASAN CHELLIAPAN
TWThomas Wilby
Thomas Wilby
MYMuhamad Ali Muhammad Yuzir
Muhamad Ali Muhammad Yuzir
PSPaul J. Sallis
Paul J. Sallis

29 April 2021 in Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IAImran Ahmad
Imran Ahmad
Norhayati AbdullahNorhayati Abdullah
Norhayati Abdullah
IKI. Koji
I. Koji
MYMuhamad Ali Muhammad Yuzir
Muhamad Ali Muhammad Yuzir
SMS.E. Mohamad
S.E. Mohamad
The increase in global pollution, industrialization and fast economic progress are considered to inflict serious consequences to the quality and availability of water throughout the world. Wastewater is generated from three major sources, i.e. industrial, agricultural, and municipal which contain pollutants, such as: xenobiotics, microplastics, heavy metals and augmented by high amount of carbon, phosphorus, and nitrogen compounds. Wastewater treatment is one of the most pressing issues since it cannot be achieved by any specific technology because of the varying nature and concentrations of pollutants and efficiency of the treatment technologies. The degradation capacity of these conventional treatment technologies is limited, especially regarding heavy metals, nutrients, and xenobiotics, steering the researchers to bioremediation using microalgae (Phycoremediation). Bioremediation can be defined as use of microalgae for removal or biotransformation of pollutants and CO2 from wastewater with concomitant biomass production. However, the usage of wastewaters for the bulk cultivation of microalgae is advantageous for reducing carbon, nutrients cost, minimizing the consumption of freshwater, nitrogen, phosphorus recovery, and removal of other pollutants from wastewater and producing sufficient biomass for value addition for either biofuels or other value-added compounds. Several types of microalgae like Chlorella and Dunaliella have proved their applicability in the treatment of wastewaters. The bottlenecks concerning the microalgal wastewater bioremediation need to be identified and elucidated to proceed in bioremediation using microalgae. This objective of this paper is to provide an insight about the treatment of different wastewaters using microalgae and microalgal potential in the treatment of wastewaters containing heavy metals and emerging contaminants, with the specialized cultivation systems. This review also summarizes the end use applications of microalgal biomass which makes the bioremediation aspect more environmentally sustainable. Copyright © 2021 by Authors, Published by BCREC Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0).

8 March 2019 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMahiuddin Alamgir
Mahiuddin Alamgir
MMMorteza Mohsenipour
Morteza Mohsenipour
MHMohamad Rajab Houmsi
Mohamad Rajab Houmsi
Wang XiaojunWang Xiaojun
Wang Xiaojun
Shamsuddin ShahidShamsuddin Shahid
Shamsuddin Shahid
MYMuhamad Ali Muhammad Yuzir
Muhamad Ali Muhammad Yuzir
Droughts are more damaging when they occur during crop growing season. This research assessed the spatial distribution of drought risks to crops in Bangladesh. Catastrophe theory-based weighting method was used to estimate drought hazard, exposure, and risk by avoiding potential human bias. Ten major crops, including eight different types of rice, wheat, and potato, were selected for evaluation of drought risk. Results showed that 32.4%, 27.2%, and 16.2% of land in Bangladesh is prone to extreme Kharif (May-October), Rabi (November-April), and pre-Kharif (March-May) droughts, respectively. Among the major crops, Hybrid Boro rice cultivated in 18.2% of the area is found to be highly vulnerable to droughts, which is followed by High Yield Varity (HYV) Boro (16.9%), Transplant Aman (16.4%), HYV Aman (14.1%), and Basic Aman (12.4%) rice. Hybrid Boro rice in 12 districts, different varieties of Aman rice in 10 districts, and HYV Boro rice in 9 districts, mostly located in the north and northwest of Bangladesh, are exposed to high risk of droughts. High frequency of droughts and use of more land for agriculture have made the region highly prone to droughts. The methodology adopted in this study can be utilized for unbiased estimation of drought risk in agriculture in order to adopt necessary risk reduction measures.