Alberto Tazioli

Prof. Alberto Tazioli

Università Politecnica delle Marche, department SIMAU
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2020 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGianluigi Busico
Gianluigi Busico
Nicolò ColombaniNicolò Colombani
Nicolò Colombani
Davide FronziDavide Fronzi
Davide Fronzi
MPMarco Pellegrini
Marco Pellegrini
Alberto TazioliAlberto Tazioli
Alberto Tazioli
Micòl MastrociccoMicòl Mastrocicco
Micòl Mastrocicco

24 January 2018 in Hydrogeology Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marco PetittaMarco Petitta
Marco Petitta
LMLucia Mastrorillo
Lucia Mastrorillo
Elisabetta PreziosiElisabetta Preziosi
Elisabetta Preziosi
FBFrancesca Banzato
Francesca Banzato
MBMarino Domenico Barberio
Marino Domenico Barberio
CDCarlo Doglioni
Carlo Doglioni
A seismic sequence in central Italy from August 2016 to January 2017 affected groundwater dynamics in fractured carbonate aquifers. Changes in spring discharge, water-table position, and streamflow were recorded for several months following nine Mw 5.0–6.5 seismic events. Data from 22 measurement sites, located within 100 km of the epicentral zones, were analyzed. The intensity of the induced changes were correlated with seismic magnitude and distance to epicenters. The additional post-seismic discharge from rivers and springs was found to be higher than 9 m3/s, totaling more than 0.1 km3 of groundwater release over 6 months. This huge and unexpected contribution increased streamflow in narrow mountainous valleys to previously unmeasured peak values. Analogously to the L’Aquila 2009 post-earthquake phenomenon, these hydrogeological changes might reflect an increase of bulk hydraulic conductivity at the aquifer scale, which would increase hydraulic heads in the discharge zones and lower them in some recharge areas. The observed changes may also be partly due to other mechanisms, such as shaking and/or squeezing effects related to intense subsidence in the core of the affected area, where effects had maximum extent, or breaching of hydraulic barriers. Une séquence sismique en Italie centrale entre Août 2016 et Janvier 2017 affecte la dynamique des eaux souterraines dans des aquifères carbonatés fracturés. Des changements dans le débit des sources, la position du niveau piézométrique, et l’écoulement ont été enregistrées pour plusieurs mois à la suite des neuf événements sismiques d’intensité 5.0–6.5. Les données de 22 sites de mesures, situés à moins de 100 km des zones des épicentres, ont été analysées. L’intensité des changements induits a été corrélée avec la magnitude sismique et la distance des épicentres. On a constaté que les débits post-sismiques additionnels des rivières et des sources étaient supérieurs à 9 m3/s, totalisant plus de 0.1 km3 de libération d’eaux souterraines sur 6 mois. Cette contribution énorme et inattendue a augmenté les débits des cours d’eau dans les vallées étroites montagneuses jusqu’à des valeurs de pics non mesurées auparavant. De façon analogue au phénomène de l’Aquila 2009 après le séisme, ces changements hydrogéologiques pourraient refléter une augmentation de la conductivité hydraulique apparente à l’échelle de l’aquifère, ce qui augmenterait les charges hydrauliques dans les zones de décharge et les abaisserait dans certaines zones de recharge. Les changements observés peuvent aussi être dues en partie à d’autres mécanismes, tels que les effets de secousse et/ou de compression liés à une subsidence intense dans le noyau de la zone affectée, où les effets ont une portée maximale, ou à la rupture des barrières hydrauliques. Una secuencia sísmica en el centro de Italia desde agosto de 2016 a enero de 2017 afectó la dinámica del agua subterránea en los acuíferos de carbonato fracturados. Los cambios en la descarga de los manantiales, la posición de la capa freática y el caudal se registraron durante varios meses luego de nueve eventos sísmicos de Mw 5.0–6.5. Se analizaron datos de 22 sitios de medición, ubicados dentro de los 100 km de las zonas de los epicentros. La intensidad de los cambios inducidos se correlacionó con la magnitud sísmica y la distancia a los epicentros. Se encontró que la descarga postsísmica adicional de ríos y manantiales era superior a 9 m3/s, totalizando más de 0.1 km3 de descarga de agua subterránea durante 6 meses. Esta enorme e inesperada contribución aumentó el flujo de las corrientes en los estrechos valles montañosos a valores máximos previamente no medidos. Análogamente al fenómeno de L’Aquila 2009 después del terremoto, estos cambios hidrogeológicos podrían reflejar un aumento de la conductividad hidráulica global en la escala del acuífero, lo que aumentaría las cargas hidráulicas en las zonas de descarga y las reduciría en algunas áreas de recarga. Los cambios observados también pueden deberse en parte a otros mecanismos, como temblores y/o efectos de compresión relacionados con un hundimiento intenso en el núcleo del área afectada, donde los efectos tuvieron la máxima extensión, o la ruptura de barreras hidráulicas. 2016年8月至2017年1月意大利中部的地震序列影响了断裂碳酸盐含水层的地下水动态。在9次Mw 5.0–6.5地震事件之后的几个月内记录了春季排水量,地下水位和河流的流量的变化。分析了位于震中区100公里范围内的22个测量点的数据。诱发变化的强度与地震的震级和震中距有关。发现河流和泉水的额外震后排水量高于9立方米/秒,超过6个月的地下水排放总量超过0.1立方公里。这个巨大而意想不到的贡献增加了狭窄山谷中的水流量,达到以前未测量的峰值水平。类似于拉奎拉2009年的地震后现象,这些水文地质的变化可能反映出含水层规模的分散水力传导性的增加,这将增加排放区的水头,并在一些补给区域降低它们。观察到的变化还可能部分归因于其他机制,如受影响地区核心的强烈沉降引起的震动和/或挤压效应,其中影响最大,或者破坏水力屏障。 A sequência sísmica no centro da Itália de agosto de 2016 a janeiro de 2017 afetou a dinâmica das águas subterrâneas em aquíferos carbonáticos fraturados. Mudanças na descarga em nascentes, posição do nível freático e nos fluxos foram registrados por vários meses após nove eventos sísmicos com magnitude de 5.0 a 6.5. Dados de 22 locais de medição, localizados a 100 km das zonas de epicentro, foram analisados. A intensidade das mudanças induzidas foi correlacionada com a magnitude e distância dos epicentros. A descarga adicional pós-sísmica dos rios e nascentes foram encontradas acima de 9 m3/s, totalizando mais que 0.1 km3 de água subterrânea liberada em 6 meses. Essa enorme e inesperada contribuição aumentou o fluxo em vales montanhosos estreitos para valores máximos não registrados anteriormente. Analogamente ao fenômeno pós-terremoto de Áquila em 2009, essas mudanças hidrogeológicas podem refletir um aumento da condutividade hidráulica volumétrica na escala do aquífero, que aumentaria o nível potenciométrico nas zonas de descarga e diminuiria em algumas áreas de recarga. As mudanças observadas podem também ser em parte devido a outros mecanismos, como efeito de tremores e/ou compressão relacionados a subsidência intensa no núcleo da área afetada, onde os efeitos atingiram a extensão máxima, ou do rompimento de barreiras hidráulicas.

19 October 2011 in Hydrological Sciences Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Alberto TazioliAlberto Tazioli
Alberto Tazioli
Discharge measurements in natural watercourses are performed in order to determine the value of the surface outflow of a basin, its temporal variability, and the outflow characteristics. The methods conventionally used for these measurements utilize an immersed current meter in different points of a river section, which acquires the mean flow velocity. Using this measurement, the discharge can be calculated. Some experimental problems arise, however, when there is a very high discharge. An important method, valid in such cases, is the artificial tracing method. In particular, the use of chemical tracers for small watercourses is very convenient because they are low cost, easily handled, low impact and provide satisfactory results. In the past, radioactive tracers such as tritium have been used in large rivers, while fluorescent tracers have been commonly exploited in the USA and now elsewhere. However, if the water is turbid, the suspended sediments may easily absorb some tracers. In this paper, the preliminary results of a comparison between current meter and artificial tracer measurements are reported. In particular, field tests in a small tributary have been performed, in order to investigate the behaviour of different tracers. Citation Tazioli, A. (2011) Experimental methods for river discharge measurements: comparison among tracers and current meter. Hydrol. Sci. J. 56(7), 1314–1324.

27 May 2021 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Davide FronziDavide Fronzi
Davide Fronzi
FMFrancesco Mirabella
Francesco Mirabella
CCCarlo Cardellini
Carlo Cardellini
SCStefano Caliro
Stefano Caliro
SPStefano Palpacelli
Stefano Palpacelli
Alberto TazioliAlberto Tazioli
Alberto Tazioli
The interaction between fluids and tectonic structures such as fault systems is a much-discussed issue. Many scientific works are aimed at understanding what the role of fault systems in the displacement of deep fluids is, by investigating the interaction between the upper mantle, the lower crustal portion and the upraising of gasses carried by liquids. Many other scientific works try to explore the interaction between the recharge processes, i.e., precipitation, and the fault zones, aiming to recognize the function of the abovementioned structures and their capability to direct groundwater flow towards preferential drainage areas. Understanding the role of faults in the recharge processes of punctual and linear springs, meant as gaining streams, is a key point in hydrogeology, as it is known that faults can act either as flow barriers or as preferential flow paths. In this work an investigation of a fault system located in the Nera River catchment (Italy), based on geo-structural investigations, tracer tests, geochemical and isotopic recharge modelling, allows to identify the role of the normal fault system before and after the 2016–2017 central Italy seismic sequence (Mmax = 6.5). The outcome was achieved by an integrated approach consisting of a structural geology field work, combined with GIS-based analysis, and of a hydrogeological investigation based on artificial tracer tests and geochemical and isotopic analyses.

20 February 2021 in Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Elisa MammolitiElisa Mammoliti
Elisa Mammoliti
Davide FronziDavide Fronzi
Davide Fronzi
AMAdriano Mancini
Adriano Mancini
Daniela ValigiDaniela Valigi
Daniela Valigi
Alberto TazioliAlberto Tazioli
Alberto Tazioli
Nowadays, the balance between incoming precipitation and stream or spring discharge is a challenging aspect in many scientific disciplines related to water management. In this regard, although advances in the methodologies for water balance calculation concerning each component of the water cycle have been achieved, the Thornthwaite–Mather method remains one of the most used, especially for hydrogeological purposes. In fact, in contrast to physical-based models, which require many input parameters, the Thornthwaite–Mather method is a simple, empirical, data-driven procedure in which the error associated with its use is smaller than that associated with the measurement of input data. The disadvantage of this method is that elaboration times can be excessively long if a classical MS Excel file is used for a large amount of data. Although many authors have attempted to automatize the procedure using simple algorithms or graphical user interfaces, some bugs have been detected. For these reasons, we propose a WebApp for monthly water balance calculation, called WaterbalANce. WaterbalANce was written in Python and is driven by a serverless computing approach. Two respective European watersheds are selected and presented to demonstrate the application of this method.

2 April 2016 in Environmental Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LALucia Aquilanti
Lucia Aquilanti
FCFrancesca Clementi
Francesca Clementi
TNTorquato Nanni
Torquato Nanni
SPStefano Palpacelli
Stefano Palpacelli
Alberto TazioliAlberto Tazioli
Alberto Tazioli
PVPaola Maria Vivalda
Paola Maria Vivalda