Yannick Weesepoel

Dr. Yannick Weesepoel

MSc
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 January 2020 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LRL.W.D. van Raamsdonk
L.W.D. van Raamsdonk
MZMeike van der Zande
Meike van der Zande
AKAlbert Koelmans
Albert Koelmans
RHRon Hoogenboom
Ron Hoogenboom
RPRuud Peters
Ruud Peters
YWYannick Weesepoel
Yannick Weesepoel
Microplastics (MPs) are considered an emerging issue as environmental pollutants and a potential health threat. This review will focus on recently published data on concentrations in food, possible effects, and monitoring methods. Some data are available on concentrations in seafood (fish, bivalves, and shrimps), water, sugar, salt, and honey, but are lacking for other foods. Bottled water is a considerable source with numbers varying between 2600 and 6300 MPs per liter. Particle size distributions have revealed an abundance of particles smaller than 25 µm, which are considered to have the highest probability to pass the intestinal border and to enter the systemic circulation of mammals. Some studies with mice and zebrafish with short- or medium-term exposure (up to 42 days) have revealed diverse results with respect to both the type and extent of effects. Most notable modifications have been observed in gut microbiota, lipid metabolism, and oxidative stress. The principal elements of MP monitoring in food are sample preparation, detection, and identification. Identified data gaps include a lack of occurrence data in plant- and animal-derived food, a need for more data on possible effects of different types of microplastics, a lack of in silico models, a lack of harmonized monitoring methods, and a further development of quality assurance.

1 March 2014 in Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Raluca Maria PopRaluca Maria Pop
Raluca Maria Pop
YWYannick Weesepoel
Yannick Weesepoel
CSCarmen Socaciu
Carmen Socaciu
Adela PinteaAdela Pintea
Adela Pintea
JVJean-Paul Vincken
Jean-Paul Vincken
HGHarry Gruppen
Harry Gruppen

1 June 2020 in Food Control
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HPHadi Parastar
Hadi Parastar
GKGeert van Kollenburg
Geert van Kollenburg
YWYannick Weesepoel
Yannick Weesepoel
ADAndré van Den Doel
André van Den Doel
LBLutgarde Buydens
Lutgarde Buydens
JJJeroen Jansen
Jeroen Jansen

1 September 2017 in Food Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TBTiago Bianchi
Tiago Bianchi
YWYannick Weesepoel
Yannick Weesepoel
AKAlex Koot
Alex Koot
IIIgnasi Iglesias
Ignasi Iglesias
IEIban Eduardo
Iban Eduardo
SRSaskia Van Ruth
Saskia Van Ruth
The aim of this study was to investigate the aroma and sensory profiles of various types of peaches (Prunus persica L. Batsch.). Forty-three commercial cultivars comprising peaches, flat peaches, nectarines, and canning peaches (pavías) were grown over two consecutive harvest years. Fruits were assessed for chemical aroma and sensory profiles. Chemical aroma profile was obtained by proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) and spectral masses were tentatively identified with PTR-Time of Flight-MS (PTR-Tof-MS). Sensory analysis was performed at commercial maturity considering seven aroma/flavor attributes. The four types of peaches showed both distinct chemical aroma and sensory profiles. Flat peaches and canning peaches showed most distinct patterns according to discriminant analysis. The sensory data were related to the volatile compounds by partial least square regression. γ-Hexalactone, γ-octalactone, hotrienol, acetic acid and ethyl acetate correlated positively, and benzeneacetaldehyde, trimethylbenzene and acetaldehyde negatively to the intensities of aroma and ripe fruit sensory scores.

29 May 2014 in Journal of Applied Phycology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KMKim J. M. Mulders
Kim J. M. Mulders
YWYannick Weesepoel
Yannick Weesepoel
PBPierre Bodenes
Pierre Bodenes
PLPacko P. Lamers
Packo P. Lamers
JVJean-Paul Vincken
Jean-Paul Vincken
RWRené H. Wijffels
René H. Wijffels

23 December 2020 in Drug Testing and Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RKRuben F. Kranenburg
Ruben F. Kranenburg
JVJoshka Verduin
Joshka Verduin
RRRenee de Ridder
Renee de Ridder
YWYannick Weesepoel
Yannick Weesepoel
MAMartin Alewijn
Martin Alewijn
AAArian van Asten
Arian van Asten
Handheld Raman spectroscopy is an emerging technique for rapid on‐site detection of drugs of abuse. Most devices are developed for on‐scene operation with a user interface that only shows whether cocaine has been detected. Extensive validation studies are unavailable, and so are typically the insight in raw spectral data and the identification criteria. This work evaluates the performance of a commercial handheld Raman spectrometer for cocaine detection based on (i) its performance on 0–100 wt% binary cocaine mixtures, (ii) retrospective comparison of 3,168 case samples from 2015 to 2020 analyzed by both gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and Raman, (iii) assessment of spectral selectivity, and (iv) comparison of the instrument's on‐screen results with combined partial least square regression (PLS‐R) and discriminant analysis (PLS‐DA) models. The limit of detection was dependent on sample composition and varied between 10 wt% and 40 wt% cocaine. Because the average cocaine content in street samples is well above this limit, a 97.5% true positive rate was observed in case samples. No cocaine false positives were reported, although 12.5% of the negative samples were initially reported as inconclusive by the built‐in software. The spectral assessment showed high selectivity for Raman peaks at 1,712 (cocaine base) and 1,716 cm−1 (cocaine HCl). Combined PLS‐R and PLS‐DA models using these features confirmed and further improved instrument performance. This study scientifically assessed the performance of a commercial Raman spectrometer, providing useful insight on its applicability for both presumptive detection and legally valid evidence of cocaine presence for law enforcement.