This paper presents the behavior of composite panels based on glass fiber unidirectional fabrics and a bi-component epoxy resin under ballistic impacts that characterize two threat levels: FB2 and FB3, according to EN 1523:2004. The tested panels had characteristics kept in narrow ranges: thickness 18.26 ± 0.22 mm, mass ratio fabrics/panel 0.788 ± 0.015, surface density 27.51 ± 0.26 kg/m². After testing the panels, the failure mechanisms of the panel were evidenced by scanning electron microscopy and photographs. Here the authors present a finite-element model at meso scale that was used for evaluating if the composite, initially tested at level FB2 (9 mm FMJ, v₀ = 375 m/s), could withstand the higher level of impact, FB3 (projectile type 0.357 Magnum and impact velocity of v₀ = 433 m/s). Simulation was performed in Explicit Dynamics (Ansys), keeping the same target but changing the projectile for the two different levels of threat. The results of the simulation were encouraging for making tests at level FB3, indicating the importance of alternating actual tests with simulations in order to achieve better protection with reduced surface weight. The simulation illustrated differences in impact duration and number of layers broken on the panel for each level. Validation of the model was based on the number of broken layers and the dimension of the delamination zone between the last two layers. Scanning electron microscopy was used for identifying failure mechanisms at the micro and meso scale. We found that damage to the composite was intensively dependent on impact velocity, this being quantitatively evaluated using the number of layers broken, the effect of delamination on separating layers and the deformation of the last layer.

This paper presents experimental results on the behavior of a class of glass fiber composites under low velocity impacts, in order to analyze their usage in designing low velocity impact-resistant components in car and marine industries. Also, a finite element model at the meso level (considering yarn as a compact, homogenous and isotropic material) was run with the help of Ansys Explicit Dynamics in order to point out the stages of the failure and the equivalent stress distribution on the main yarns in different layers of the composite. The composites were manufactured at laboratory scale via the laying-up and pressing method, using a quadriaxial glass fiber fabric (0°/+45°/90°/−45°) supplied by Castro Composites (Pontevedra, Spain) and an epoxy resin. The resin was a two-component resin (Biresin^® CR82 and hardener CH80-2) supplied by Sika Group (Bludenz, Austria). The mass ratio for the fabric and panel was kept in the range of 0.70–0.77. The variables for this research were as follows: the number of layers of glass fiber fabric, the impact velocity (2–4 m/s, corresponding to an impact energy of 11–45 J, respectively) and the diameter of the hemispherical impactor (Φ10 mm and Φ20 mm) made of hardened steel. The tests were performed on an Instron CEAST 9340 test machine, and at least three tests with close results are presented. We investigated the influence of the test parameters on the maximum force (F_max) measured during impact, the time to F_max and the duration of impact, t_f, all considered when the force is falling to zero again. Scanning electron microscopy and photography were used for discussing the failure processes at the fiber (micro) and panel (macro) level. At a velocity impact of 2 m/s (corresponding to an impact energy of 11 J), even the thinner panels (with two layers of quadriaxial glass fiber fabric, 1.64 mm thickness and a surface density of 3.51 kg/m²) had only partial penetration (damages on the panel face, without damage on panel back), but at a velocity impact of 4 m/s (corresponding to an impact energy of 45 J), only composite panels with six layers of quadriaxial fabric (5.25 mm thickness and a surface density of 9.89 kg/m²) presented back faces with only micro-exfoliated spots of the matrix for tests with both impactors. These results encourage the continuation of research on actual components for car and naval industries subjected to low velocity impacts.

Even more than in other field of activities, standardization in ballistic protection is in trends of CEN/CENELEC declaration that “standards build trust”, promoting innovation and introduction of new, performant solutions based on test procedures and protocols that are able to point out quality and safety for such systems. Ballistic testing standards have particular specifications for ballistic materials, differentiation of tests being made especially on the purpose of the ballistic protection product. In the last decades, test methods have been refined and measurement devices have become more complex. The main set of standards is developed by military organizations (as NATO), highly industrialized countries, where the military and research in the field are priorities (USA, European Community, Asian countries, South Africa). Some states refer to American standards by using them as guides. Depending on the destination of the ballistic product, specifications in standards are different. The authors give examples of how standards requirements are implemented in testing ballistic protection systems, in order to point out the particularities of introducing and verifying new and classical products in this domain. Generally, the results of the ballistic tests are evaluated by acceptance or rejecting the tested product, based on specific criteria, included in standards.

This paper presents experimental results from three-point bending tests for a composite made of quadriaxial glass fiber fabrics and an epoxy resin. Two composites were tested, one with 8 layers and the other with 16 layers; both had the same matrix (the epoxy resin). Tests were carried out, using five different test rates from 10 mm/min to 1000 mm/min. The following parameters were recorded and calculated: Young’s modulus, flexural stress, flexural strain, energy, force, and all four for the first peak. The experimental data reveal no sensitivity for these materials based on the test rates, at least for the analyzed range; but, the characteristics for the thicker composite, with 16 layers of fabric, are slightly lower than those for the thinner composite, with 8 layers. The results pointed out that, for the same thickness of composite, certain characteristics, such as stress at the first peak, the flexural modulus, strain at the first peak, and energy at the first peak, are not sensitive to the test rate in the range 10–1000 mm/min. The energy at the first peak is double for the 16-layer composite compared to the 8-layer composite, but the specific energy (as energy on cross-sectional area) has close values: 103.47 kJ/m² for the 8-layer composite and 106.51 kJ/m² for the 16-layer composite. The results recommend this composite for applications in components with resistance to bending or for low-velocity impact protection.

This paper presents a synthesis of failures of aramid fibers used in protective systems, with the help of SEM images obtained from three types of samples (panels made of fabrics with aramid fibers) tested against bullets, knives and spikes. This investigation is useful when using a step-by-step magnification and even macro photos in order to explain the mechanical failures of fibers. Several types of failure mechanisms (shear and tensile break, local bending, debonding from the matrix, fibrillation, local necking, etc.) were detected and discussed. Almost all of these failure mechanisms are present, with different densities of occurrence, in the studied panels made of aramid fibers. The description of failure mechanisms had to be conducted following the test conditions accurately. Failure mechanisms of aramid fibers are particularly relevant due to their specific molecular chains making them adequate for applications like ballistic and bladed weapon attacks.

In this study, the composition and mechanical properties of composites designed for shipbuilding are described. Four different composites were designed and fabricated by the research team, using quadriaxial glass fiber fabric (eight layers in all composites), two different resins (the epoxy resin SikaBiresin^® CR82 with the hardener CH80-2 or the polyester resin Enydyne H 68372 TA with Metox-50 W as the accelerator), and a middle layer of Coremat Xi 3 (only applied in some composites). The experimental results of low-velocity impact tests are also discussed, including the graphics force (displacement) and absorbed energy (displacement and velocity). The displacement and composite quality were evaluated through several parameters, such as maximum force, absorbed energy, and maximum displacement. Impact tests were carried out using four impact energy values (50–200 J), with an average impact velocity in the range of 4.37 ± 0.05 m/s. Only partial penetrations were obtained for all tested composites. For the low energy tests (50 J), the four composite materials were not well differentiated by graph shapes and parameter values, but for the higher energy tests, the composites containing Coremat Xi 3 displayed better behavior, having F_max reduced with 10.8% to 29.08%. The higher absorbed energy of these composites can be explained by the plateau generated by the force from a longer impactor displacement in contact with the composite. The results generated in this study confirm the suitability of the designed composites for shipbuilding applications. Still, the composites have light differences in terms of energy absorption in low-velocity impact and a significant reduction in maximum force.