This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.
The goal to decrease greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is spurring interest in renewable energy systems from time-varying sources (e.g., photovoltaics, wind) and these can require batteries to help load balancing. However, the batteries themselves add additional GHG emissions to the electricity system in all its life cycle phases. This article begins by investigating the GHG emissions for the manufacturing of two stationary lithium-ion batteries, comparing production in Europe, US and China. Next, we analyze how the installation and operation of these batteries change the GHG emissions of the electricity supply in two pilot sites. Life cycle assessment is used for GHG emissions calculation. The regional comparison on GHG emissions of battery manufacturing shows that primary aluminum, cathode paste and battery cell production are the principal components of the GHG emissions of battery manufacturing. Regional variations are linked mainly to high grid electricity demand and regional changes in the electricity mixes, resulting in base values of 77 kg CO2-eq/kWh to 153 kg CO2-eq/kWh battery capacity. The assessment of two pilot sites shows that the implementation of batteries can lead to GHG emission savings of up to 77%, if their operation enables an increase in renewable energy sources in the electricity system.
Johanna Pucker-Singer; Christian Aichberger; Jernej Zupančič; Camilla Neumann; David Bird; Gerfried Jungmeier; Andrej Gubina; Andreas Tuerk. Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Stationary Battery Installations in Two Renewable Energy Projects. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6330 .
AMA StyleJohanna Pucker-Singer, Christian Aichberger, Jernej Zupančič, Camilla Neumann, David Bird, Gerfried Jungmeier, Andrej Gubina, Andreas Tuerk. Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Stationary Battery Installations in Two Renewable Energy Projects. Sustainability. 2021; 13 (11):6330.
Chicago/Turabian StyleJohanna Pucker-Singer; Christian Aichberger; Jernej Zupančič; Camilla Neumann; David Bird; Gerfried Jungmeier; Andrej Gubina; Andreas Tuerk. 2021. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Stationary Battery Installations in Two Renewable Energy Projects." Sustainability 13, no. 11: 6330.
We compiled 50 publications from the years 2005–2020 about life cycle assessment (LCA) of Li-ion batteries to assess the environmental effects of production, use, and end of life for application in electric vehicles. Investigated LCAs showed for the production of a battery pack per kWh battery capacity a median of 280 kWh/kWh_bc (25%-quantile–75%-quantile: 200–500 kWh/kWh_bc) for the primary energy consumption and a median of 120 kg CO2-eq/kWh_bc (25%-quantile–75%-quantile: 70–175 kg CO2-eq/kWh_bc) for greenhouse gas emissions. We expect results for current batteries to be in the lower range. Over the lifetime of an electric vehicle, these emissions relate to 20 g CO2-eq/km (25%-quantile–75%-quantile: 10–50 g CO2-eq/km). Considering recycling processes, greenhouse gas savings outweigh the negative environmental impacts of recycling and can reduce the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions by a median value of 20 kg CO2-eq/kWh_bc (25%-quantile–75%-quantile: 5–29 kg CO2-eq/kWh_bc). Overall, many LCA results overestimated the environmental impact of cell manufacturing, due to the assessments of relatively small or underutilized production facilities. Material emissions, like from mining and especially processing from metals and the cathode paste, could have been underestimated, due to process-based assumptions and non-regionalized primary data. Second-life applications were often not considered.
Christian Aichberger; Gerfried Jungmeier. Environmental Life Cycle Impacts of Automotive Batteries Based on a Literature Review. Energies 2020, 13, 6345 .
AMA StyleChristian Aichberger, Gerfried Jungmeier. Environmental Life Cycle Impacts of Automotive Batteries Based on a Literature Review. Energies. 2020; 13 (23):6345.
Chicago/Turabian StyleChristian Aichberger; Gerfried Jungmeier. 2020. "Environmental Life Cycle Impacts of Automotive Batteries Based on a Literature Review." Energies 13, no. 23: 6345.