Susan Hanson

Susan Hanson

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Susan Hanson

Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 December 2010 in Climatic Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SHSusan Hanson
Susan Hanson
RNRobert Nicholls
Robert Nicholls
NRN. Ranger
N. Ranger
SHS. Hallegatte
S. Hallegatte
JCJ. Corfee-Morlot
J. Corfee-Morlot
JCJ. Chateau
J. Chateau
This paper presents a first estimate of the exposure of the world’s large port cities (population exceeding one million inhabitants in 2005) to coastal flooding due to sea-level rise and storm surge now and in the 2070s, taking into account scenarios of socio-economic and climate changes. The analysis suggests that about 40 million people (0.6% of the global population or roughly 1 in 10 of the total port city population in the cities considered) are currently exposed to a 1 in 100 year coastal flood event. For assets, the total value exposed in 2005 across all cities considered is estimated to be US$3,000 billion; corresponding to around 5% of global GDP in 2005 (both measured in international USD) with USA, Japan and the Netherlands being the countries with the highest values. By the 2070s, total population exposed could grow more than threefold due to the combined effects of sea-level rise, subsidence, population growth and urbanisation with asset exposure increasing to more than ten times current levels or approximately 9% of projected global GDP in this period. On the global-scale, population growth, socio-economic growth and urbanization are the most important drivers of the overall increase in exposure particularly in developing countries, as low-lying areas are urbanized. Climate change and subsidence can significantly exacerbate this increase in exposure. Exposure is concentrated in a few cities: collectively Asia dominates population exposure now and in the future and also dominates asset exposure by the 2070s. Importantly, even if the environmental or socio-economic changes were smaller than assumed here the underlying trends would remain. This research shows the high potential benefits from risk-reduction planning and policies at the city scale to address the issues raised by the possible growth in exposure.

8 March 2021 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RNRobert Nicholls
Robert Nicholls
DLDaniel Lincke
Daniel Lincke
JHJochen Hinkel
Jochen Hinkel
SBSally Brown
Sally Brown
AVAthanasios Vafeidis
Athanasios Vafeidis
JFJiayi Fang
Jiayi Fang

3 October 2013 in Wires Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RNRobert Nicholls
Robert Nicholls
SHSusan E. Hanson
Susan E. Hanson
JLJason A. Lowe
Jason A. Lowe
RWRichard A. Warrick
Richard A. Warrick
XLXianfu Lu
Xianfu Lu
ALAntony J. Long
Antony J. Long
Global‐mean sea‐level rise will drive impacts and adaptation needs around the world's coasts over the 21st century and beyond. A key element in assessing these issues is the development of scenarios (or plausible futures) of local relative sea‐level rise to support impact assessment and adaptation planning. This requires combining a number of different but uncertain components of sea level which can be linked to climatic and non‐climatic (i.e., uplift/subsidence of coastal land) factors. A major concern remains about the possibility of significant contributions from the major Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets and this must be factored into the assessments, despite the uncertainty. This paper reviews the different mechanisms which contribute to sea‐level change and considers a methodology for combining the available data to create relative (or local) sea‐level rise scenarios suitable for impact and adaptation assessments across a range of sophistication of analysis. The methods that are developed are pragmatic and consider the different needs of impact assessment, adaptation planning, and long‐term decision making. This includes the requirements of strategic decision makers who rightly focus on low probability but high consequence changes and their consequences. Hence plausible high end sea‐level rise scenarios beyond the conventional Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) range and which take into account evidence beyond that from the current generation of climate models are developed and their application discussed. Continued review and development of sea‐level scenarios is recommended, starting with assimilating the insights of the forthcoming IPCC AR5 assessment. WIREs Clim Change 2014, 5:129–150. doi: 10.1002/wcc.253This article is categorized under: Assessing Impacts of Climate Change > Scenario Development and Application

27 August 2014 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SBSally Brown
Sally Brown
RNRobert Nicholls
Robert Nicholls
SHSusan Hanson
Susan Hanson
GBGeoff Brundrit
Geoff Brundrit
JDJohn Dearing
John Dearing
CWColin D. Woodroffe
Colin D. Woodroffe

22 March 2021 in Wires Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RNRobert Nicholls
Robert Nicholls
SHSusan E. Hanson
Susan E. Hanson
JLJason A. Lowe
Jason A. Lowe
ASAimee Slangen
Aimee Slangen
TWThomas Wahl
Thomas Wahl
ALAntony J. Long
Antony J. Long
The release of new and updated sea‐level rise (SLR) information, such as from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Reports, needs to be better anticipated in coastal risk and adaptation assessments. This requires risk and adaptation assessments to be regularly reviewed and updated as needed, reflecting the new information but retaining useful information from earlier assessments. In this paper, updated guidance on the types of SLR information available is presented, including for sea‐level extremes. An intercomparison of the evolution of the headline projected ranges across all the IPCC reports show an increase from the fourth and fifth assessments to the most recent “Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate” assessment. IPCC reports have begun to highlight the importance of potential high‐end sea‐level response, mainly reflecting uncertainties in the Greenland/Antarctic ice sheet components, and how this might be considered in scenarios. The methods that are developed here are practical and consider coastal risk assessment, adaptation planning, and long‐term decision‐making to be an ongoing process and ensure that despite the large uncertainties, pragmatic adaptation decisions can be made. It is concluded that new sea‐level information should not be seen as an automatic reason for abandoning existing assessments, but as an opportunity to review (i) the assessment's robustness in the light of new science and (ii) the utility of proactive adaptation and planning strategies, especially over the more uncertain longer term.This article is categorized under: Assessing Impacts of Climate Change > Scenario Development and Application

19 October 2023 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAlexandre K. Magnan
Alexandre K. Magnan
Robert BellRobert Bell
Robert Bell
VDVirginie K. E. Duvat
Virginie K. E. Duvat
JFJames Ford
James Ford
MGMatthias Garschagen
Matthias Garschagen
GWGundula Winter
Gundula Winter