Reducing the time to diagnose COVID-19 helps to manage insufficient isolation-bed resources and adequately accommodate critically ill patients. There is currently no alternative method to real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which requires 40 cycles to diagnose COVID-19. We propose a deep learning (DL) model to improve the speed of COVID-19 RT-PCR diagnosis. We developed and tested a DL model using the long short-term memory method with a dataset of fluorescence values measured in each cycle of 5810 RT-PCR tests. Among the DL models developed here, the diagnostic performance of the 21st model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity of 84.55%, 93.33%, and 75.72%, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the 24th model showed an AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity of 91.27%, 90.00%, and 92.54%, respectively.

Alexandre Berard, Dain Lee, Stephane Clinchant, Kweonwoo Jung, Vassilina Nikoulina. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2021.

Background/Objectives: Aortic dissection (AD) and aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) are fatal diseases with similar clinical characteristics. Immediate computed tomography (CT) with a contrast medium is required to confirm the presence of AD or IMH. This retrospective study aimed to use CT images to differentiate AD and IMH from normal aorta (NA) using a deep learning algorithm. Methods: A 6-year retrospective study of non-contrast chest CT images was conducted at a university hospital in Seoul, Republic of Korea, from January 2016 to July 2021. The position of the aorta was analyzed in each CT image and categorized as NA, AD, or IMH. The images were divided into training, validation, and test sets in an 8:1:1 ratio. A deep learning model that can differentiate between AD and IMH from NA using non-contrast CT images alone, called YOLO (You Only Look Once) v4, was developed. The YOLOv4 model was used to analyze 8881 non-contrast CT images from 121 patients. Results: The YOLOv4 model can distinguish AD, IMH, and NA from each other simultaneously with a probability of over 92% using non-contrast CT images. Conclusions: This model can help distinguish AD and IMH from NA when applying a contrast agent is challenging.

The PSC box girder bridge is a pre-stressed box girder bridge that accounts for a considerable part of large-scale bridges. However, when concrete is poured, even small mistakes might result in voids that appear during long-term maintenance. In this paper, we present a technique for detecting the void in the duct inside the PSC box girder bridge. Data are acquired utilizing the non-destructive impact-echo (IE) approach to detect these voids. IE creates time-series data as signal data initially; however, we want to use a CNN auto-encoder (AE). A scalogram, which is a kind of wavelet transformation, is used to convert time series data into an image. An AE is a type of unsupervised learning that aims to minimize the difference between the input and output. By comparing histograms, the difference is calculated. To begin, we create scalogram images from all IE signal data, which were randomly sampled as 98% normal and 2% void. The CNN AE is then trained and evaluated utilizing all the data. Finally, we examine the input and output histogram similarity distributions. As a consequence, only 4% of the normal data had a similarity of less than two standard deviations from the mean, whereas 34.7% of the void data did. As a result, the existence of voids inside the PSC duct could be demonstrated to be predictive in the absence of annotated data.

(1) Background: Rapid and accurate negative discrimination enables efficient management of scarce isolated bed resources and adequate patient accommodation in the majority of areas experiencing an explosion of confirmed cases due to Omicron mutations. Until now, methods for artificial intelligence or deep learning to replace time-consuming RT-PCR have relied on CXR, chest CT, blood test results, or clinical information. (2) Methods: We proposed and compared five different types of deep learning algorithms (RNN, LSTM, Bi-LSTM, GRU, and transformer) for reducing the time required for RT-PCR diagnosis by learning the change in fluorescence value derived over time during the RT-PCR process. (3) Results: Among the five deep learning algorithms capable of training time series data, Bi-LSTM and GRU were shown to be able to decrease the time required for RT–PCR diagnosis by half or by 25% without significantly impairing the diagnostic performance of the COVID-19 RT–PCR test. (4) Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of the model developed in this study when 40 cycles of RT–PCR are used for diagnosis shows the possibility of nearly halving the time required for RT–PCR diagnosis.

Current methods for evaluating ventriculomegaly, particularly Evans' Index (EI), fail to accurately assess three-dimensional ventricular changes. We developed and validated an automated multi-class segmentation system for precise volumetric assessment, simultaneously segmenting five anatomical classes (ventricles, parenchyma, skull, skin, and hemorrhage) to support future augmented reality (AR)-guided external ventricular drainage (EVD) systems. Using the nnUNet architecture, we trained our model on 288 brain CT scans with diverse pathological conditions and validated it using internal (n=10),external (n=43) and public (n=192) datasets. Clinical validation involved 227 patients who underwent CSF drainage procedures. We compared automated volumetric measurements against traditional EI measurements and actual CSF drainage volumes in surgical cases. The model achieved exceptional performance with a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 93.0% across all five classes, demonstrating consistent performance across institutional and public datasets, with particularly robust ventricle segmentation (92.5%). Clinical validation revealed EI was the strongest single predictor of ventricular volume (adjusted R² = 0.430, p < 0.001), though influenced by age, sex, and diagnosis type. Most significantly, in EVD cases, automated volume differences showed remarkable correlation with actual CSF drainage amounts (β = 0.956, adjusted R² = 0.936, p < 0.001), validating the system's accuracy in measuring real CSF volume changes. Our comprehensive multi-class segmentation system offers a superior alternative to traditional measurements with potential for non-invasive CSF dynamics monitoring and AR-guided EVD placement.