Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess patient comfort when imaged on a newly introduced 0.55T low-field magnetic resonance (MR) scanner system with a wider bore opening compared to a conventional 1.5T MR scanner system. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, fifty patients (mean age: 66.2 ± 17.0 years, 22 females, 28 males) underwent subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations with matched imaging protocols at 0.55T (MAGNETOM FreeMax, Siemens Healthineers; Erlangen, Germany) and 1.5T (MAGNETOM Avanto Fit, Siemens Healthineers; Erlangen, Germany) on the same day. MRI performed between 05/2021 and 07/2021 was included for analysis. The 0.55T MRI system had a bore opening of 80 cm, while the bore diameter of the 1.5T scanner system was 60 cm. Four patient groups were defined by imaged body regions: (1) cranial or cervical spine MRI using a head/neck coil (n = 27), (2) lumbar or thoracic spine MRI using only the in-table spine coils (n = 10), (3) hip MRI using a large flex coil (n = 8) and (4) upper- or lower-extremity MRI using small flex coils (n = 5). Following the MRI examinations, patients evaluated (1) sense of space, (2) noise level, (3) comfort, (4) coil comfort and (5) overall examination impression on a 5-point Likert-scale (range: 1= “much worse” to 5 = “much better”) using a questionnaire. Maximum noise levels of all performed imaging studies were measured in decibels (dB) by a sound level meter placed in the bore center. Results: Sense of space was perceived to be “better” or “much better” by 84% of patients for imaging examinations performed on the 0.55T MRI scanner system (mean score: 4.34 ± 0.75). Additionally, 84% of patients rated noise levels as “better” or “much better” when imaged on the low-field scanner system (mean score: 3.90 ± 0.61). Overall sensation during the imaging examination at 0.55T was rated as “better” or “much better” by 78% of patients (mean score: 3.96 ± 0.70). Quantitative assessment showed significantly reduced maximum noise levels for all 0.55T MRI studies, regardless of body region compared to 1.5T, i.e., brain MRI (83.8 ± 3.6 dB vs. 89.3 ± 5.4 dB; p = 0.04), spine MRI (83.7 ± 3.7 dB vs. 89.4 ± 2.6 dB; p = 0.004) and hip MRI (86.3 ± 5.0 dB vs. 89.1 ± 1.4 dB; p = 0.04). Conclusions: Patients perceived 0.55T new-generation low-field MRI to be more comfortable than conventional 1.5T MRI, given its larger bore opening and reduced noise levels during image acquisition. Therefore, new concepts regarding bore design and noise level reduction of MR scanner systems may help to reduce patient anxiety and improve well-being when undergoing MR imaging.

Objectives: Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of mortality and acquired disability worldwide and thus plays an enormous health-economic role. Imaging of choice is computed-tomographic (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), especially diffusion-weighted (DW) sequences. However, MR imaging is associated with high costs and therefore has a limited availability leading to low-field-MRI techniques increasingly coming into focus. Thus, the aim of our study was to assess the potential of stroke imaging with low-field MRI. Material and Methods: A scanner comparison was performed including 27 patients (17 stroke cohort, 10 control group). For each patient, a brain scan was performed first with a 1.5T scanner and afterwards with a 0.55T scanner. Scan protocols were as identical as possible and optimized. Data analysis was performed in three steps: All DWI/ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient) and FLAIR (fluid attenuated inversion recovery) sequences underwent Likert rating with respect to image impression, resolution, noise, contrast, and diagnostic quality and were evaluated by two radiologists regarding number and localization of DWI and FLAIR lesions in a blinded fashion. Then segmentation of lesion volumes was performed by two other radiologists on DWI/ADC and FLAIR. Results: DWI/ADC lesions could be diagnosed with the same reliability by the most experienced reader in the 0.55T and 1.5T sequences (specificity 100% and sensitivity 92.9%, respectively). False positive findings did not occur. Detection of number/location of FLAIR lesions was mostly equivalent between 0.55T and 1.5T sequences. No significant difference (p = 0.789–0.104) for FLAIR resolution and contrast was observed regarding Likert scaling. For DWI/ADC noise, the 0.55T sequences were significantly superior (p < 0.026). Otherwise, the 1.5T sequences were significantly superior (p < 0.029). There was no significant difference in infarct volume and volume of infarct demarcation between the 0.55T and 1.5T sequences, when detectable. Conclusions: Low-field MRI stroke imaging at 0.55T may not be inferior to scanners with higher field strengths and thus has great potential as a low-cost alternative in future stroke diagnostics. However, there are limitations in the detection of very small infarcts. Further technical developments with follow-up studies must show whether this problem can be solved.

Purpose: Accurate detection of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) on susceptibility-weighted (SWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for the characterization of many neurological diseases. Low-field MRI offers greater access at lower costs and lower infrastructural requirements, but also reduced susceptibility artifacts. We therefore evaluated the diagnostic performance for the detection of CMBs of a whole-body low-field MRI in a prospective cohort of suspected stroke patients compared to an established 1.5 T MRI. Methods: A prospective scanner comparison was performed including 27 patients, of whom 3 patients were excluded because the time interval was >1 h between acquisition of the 1.5 T and 0.55 T MRI. All SWI sequences were assessed for the presence, number, and localization of CMBs by two neuroradiologists and additionally underwent a Likert rating with respect to image impression, resolution, noise, contrast, and diagnostic quality. Results: A total of 24 patients with a mean age of 74 years were included (11 female). Both readers detected the same number and localization of microbleeds in all 24 datasets (sensitivity and specificity 100%; interreader reliability ϰ = 1), with CMBs only being observed in 12 patients. Likert ratings of the sequences at both field strengths regarding overall image quality and diagnostic quality did not reveal significant differences between the 0.55 T and 1.5 T sequences (p = 0.942; p = 0.672). For resolution and contrast, the 0.55 T sequences were even significantly superior (p < 0.0001; p < 0.0003), whereas the 1.5 T sequences were significantly superior (p < 0.0001) regarding noise. Conclusion: Low-field MRI at 0.55 T may have similar accuracy as 1.5 T scanners for the detection of microbleeds and thus may have great potential as a resource-efficient alternative in the near future.

Clinical effects of deep brain stimulation are largely mediated by the activation of myelinated axons. Hence, increasing attention has been paid in the past on targeting white matter tracts in addition to gray matter. Aims of the present study were: (i) visualization of discrete afferences and efferences of the nucleus accumbens (NAc), supposed to be a major hub of neural networks relating to mental disorders, using probabilistic fiber tractography and a data driven approach, and (ii) validation of the applied methodology for standardized routine clinical applications. MR‐data from 11 healthy subjects and 7 measurement sessions each were acquired on a 3T MRI‐scanner. For probabilistic fiber tracking the NAc as a seed region and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), amygdala (AMY), hippocampus (HPC), dorsomedial thalamus (dmT) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) as target regions were segmented for each subject and both hemispheres. To quantitatively assess the reliability and stability of the reconstructions, we filtered and clustered the individual fiber‐tracts (NAc to target) for each session and subject and performed a point‐by‐point calculation of the maximum cluster distances for intra‐subject comparison. The connectivity patterns formed by the obtained fibers were in good concordance with published data from tracer and/or fiber‐dissection studies. Furthermore, the reliability assessment of the (NAc to target)‐fiber‐tracts yielded to high correlations between the obtained clustered‐tracts. Using DBS with directional lead technology, the workflow elaborated in this study may guide selective electrical stimulation of NAc projections.

Objective: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) has a high mortality and long-term morbidity and thus has a significant overall health–economic impact. Outcomes are especially poor if the exact onset is unknown, but reliable imaging-based methods for onset estimation have not been established. We hypothesized that onset prediction of patients with ICH using artificial intelligence (AI) may be more accurate than human readers. Material and Methods: A total of 7421 computed tomography (CT) datasets between January 2007–July 2021 from the University Hospital Basel with confirmed ICH were extracted and an ICH-segmentation algorithm as well as two classifiers (one with radiomics, one with convolutional neural networks) for onset estimation were trained. The classifiers were trained based on the gold standard of 644 datasets with a known onset of >1 and <48 h. The results of the classifiers were compared to the ratings of two radiologists. Results: Both the AI-based classifiers and the radiologists had poor discrimination of the known onsets, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 9.77 h (95% CI (confidence interval) = 8.52–11.03) for the convolutional neural network (CNN), 9.96 h (8.68–11.32) for the radiomics model, 13.38 h (11.21–15.74) for rater 1 and 11.21 h (9.61–12.90) for rater 2, respectively. The results of the CNN and radiomics model were both not significantly different to the mean of the known onsets (p = 0.705 and p = 0.423). Conclusions: In our study, the discriminatory power of AI-based classifiers and human readers for onset estimation of patients with ICH was poor. This indicates that accurate AI-based onset estimation of patients with ICH based only on CT-data may be unlikely to change clinical decision making in the near future. Perhaps multimodal AI-based approaches could improve ICH onset prediction and should be considered in future studies.