Aim: The Mini‐Mental State Examination is a widely used cognitive assessment tool. However, it has several limitations, including the learning effect and interrater reliability. Therefore, we developed a Computer‐Based Cognitive Assessment Tool (CompBased‐CAT), which runs on a tablet or personal computer. In this study, we examined the validity and discrimination ability of the CompBased‐CAT.Methods: Participants were recruited from the Otasha‐Kenshin study carried out in 2016. We included 773 community‐dwelling older individuals in Japan (332 men, 441 women, aged 65–97 years). CompBased‐CAT scores were converted to z‐scores, and the correlation with Mini‐Mental State Examination scores was examined using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Furthermore, the ability to discern cognitive impairment was examined using the receiver operating characteristic curve.Results: The Pearson's correlation coefficient for the Mini‐Mental State Examination scores and each task component of the CompBased‐CAT ranged from 0.24 to 0.41 (P < 0.001), and the correlation coefficient of the total z‐scores was 0.51 (P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the discriminating ability of the CompBased‐CATool for cognitive impairment were 0.81, 0.77 and 0.85, respectively.Conclusions: The CompBased‐CAT certainly possesses validity, discriminating ability and utility as a new cognitive assessment tool in community‐dwelling older individuals. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; ••: ••–••.

Ground reaction force during sit-to-stand motion is related to lower extremity strength, and such measurements indicating weak muscle strength, may be linked to sarcopenia. We aimed to examine and describe the relationship between sarcopenia and ground reaction force during sit-to-stand motion to develop a diagnostic tool. Can ground reaction force during sit-to-stand motion help detect sarcopenia? This study included 627 community-dwelling older adults who were divided into non-sarcopenia and sarcopenia groups to compare ground reaction force parameters. A sit-to-stand force analyzer was used to measure the ground reaction force, power, and time between the minimum and maximum ground reaction force. We assessed the association between sarcopenia and each ground reaction force parameter. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed with sarcopenia as the dependent variable and ground reaction force-related measurements as independent variables. The probability of predicting sarcopenia was calculated using multiple logistic regression analysis, with sex and age as independent variables, and another receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed using the probability value. Ground reaction force parameters related to strength and power were lower in the sarcopenia group than in the non-sarcopenia group. Furthermore, we were able to develop a formula to detect sarcopenia using the maximum ground reaction force (area under the curve; 0.906 [95% CI 0.858-0.954] for men and 0.858 [0.808-0.908] for women). The sensitivity and specificity of sarcopenia detection using this formula were 89.7% and 80.5%, respectively, for men and 95.0% and 60.9%, respectively, for women. Ground reaction force during sit-to-stand motion may reflect low skeletal muscle strength associated with sarcopenia. We were able to develop a method for sarcopenia detection by analyzing the sit-to-stand force required in only one or two sit-to-stand motions, even though it does not measure the skeletal muscle mass directly.

Aim: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic remains a major global public health issue, and it has led to restrictions in physical and social activities among community‐dwelling people, including frail older adults. This study aimed to determine the impact of the pandemic on the subjective health status and characteristics of community‐dwelling frail older adults by assessing their knowledge of infection, behaviors and negative psychological response.Methods: During October 2019, 720 older adults participated in “The Otassha Study.” A year after the COVID‐19 outbreak, between June 29 and July 31, 2020, a health status questionnaire, comprising questions concerning knowledge about infection, behaviors and psychological responses during the pandemic, was sent to all participants of the health examination in 2019. Respondents were divided into the robust and frail groups, and their responses were compared.Results: Although the self‐reported health status of the older adults in both groups was worse in 2020 than in 2019, differences were not observed in the degree of deterioration between the groups. Those in the frail group had fewer resources of information related to COVID‐19 and had fewer coping behaviors for health maintenance compared with the robust group.Conclusion: Information gathering and actions aimed at health maintenance tended to be weaker among older adults with frailty, although the influence of COVID‐19 on subjective health status did not differ significantly between robust and frail adults. Therefore, robust and frail older adults may need to adopt different countermeasures to prevent worse health during this pandemic. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 1053–1059.

Recent research has suggested that the breadth and evenness of activity and activity diversity contribute to health outcomes among older adults. However, few established assessment tools for activity diversity have been developed. This study developed an Activity Diversity Questionnaire (ADQ) for older adults through expert consultation and a preliminary survey among 18 community-dwelling older adults. The diversity score was calculated according to Shannon’s entropy. In study 1, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of the diversity scores were determined for community-dwelling older adults (n = 30). In study 2, concurrent validity was tested with participants receiving comprehensive health checkups at the Itabashi ward in Japan in 2018 (n = 766). The correlation coefficients of the diversity scores were then calculated in reference to the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index of Competence and Japan Science and Technology Agency Index of Competence. The final version of the ADQ consisted of 20 total items with excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.84) and moderate correlations with both the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index of Competence and Japan Science and Technology Agency Index of Competence (r = 0.48 and 0.60, respectively). The ADQ was developed through scientific procedures and revealed sufficient reliability and validity. As such, it is a scientifically validated tool for assessing activity diversity among older adults.

Aim: Early detection of dementia is crucial for effective intervention. The computer-based cognitive assessment tool (CompBased-CAT) was designed to assess cognitive function using a tablet computer. While its predictive validity for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is established, its test–retest reliability remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the test–retest reliability of CompBased-CAT among older Japanese adults in a community setting. Methods: This is a methodological study that examined the test–retest reliability of CompBased-CAT. Community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or older who participated in both the pre-test and post-test were included. Pre-test assessments were conducted during the 2023 Otassha study from 28 September to 8 October 2023, with the post-test administered 62 days (±14 days) later. Subtest scores were normalized to z-scores, and the total CompBased-CAT score was computed by summing these z-scores. Test–retest reliability was assessed using paired t-tests and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) two-way random-effects models, with analyses stratified by age, sex, and MCI status. Results: A total of 80 participants (mean age: 76.8 years; 27.5% male) were analyzed. Paired t-tests showed no significant difference in total scores between the pre-test (mean = −0.75; standard deviation [SD] = 3.73) and the post-test (mean = −0.42; SD = 4.45). The total score exhibited an ICC of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49–0.75) for all participants, increasing to 0.74 (95% CI = 0.48–0.88) among those with MCI. Conclusion: CompBased-CAT demonstrated good test–retest reliability, with an ICC of 0.64 among all participants, which increased to 0.74 among participants with MCI over a 2-month period, indicating its potential for monitoring cognitive function through repeated assessments.