Nik Noriman Zulkepli

Nik Noriman Zulkepli


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2017 in AIP Conference Proceedings
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
NHN. M. S. Hidayah
N. M. S. Hidayah
WLWei Wen Liu
Wei Wen Liu
Chin Wei LaiChin Wei Lai
Chin Wei Lai
NZNik Noriman Zulkepli
Nik Noriman Zulkepli
CKCheng Seong Khe
Cheng Seong Khe
HLH. Cheun Lee
H. Cheun Lee
Graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) are known to have superior properties for various applications. This work compares the properties of GO and RGO with graphite. GO was prepared by using Improved Hummer’s method whereas the produced GO was subjected to chemical reduction with the use of hydrazine hydrate. Graphite, GO and RGO had different morphologies, quality, functionalized groups, UV-Vis absorption peaks and crystallinity. With the removal of oxygen-containing functional group during reduction for RGO, the quality of samples was decreased due to higher intensity of D band than G band was seen in Raman results. In addition, platelet-like surface can be observed on the surface of graphite as compared to GO and RGO where wrinkled and layered flakes, and crumpled thin sheets were observed on GO and RGO surface respectively. Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR) analysis showed the presence of abundant oxygen-containing functional groups in GO as compared to RGO and graphite. The characteristic peaks at 26.62°, 9.03° and 24.10° for graphite, GO and RGO, respectively, can be detected from X-Ray diffraction (XRD). Furthermore, the reduction also caused red shift at 279nm from 238nm, as obtained from ultraviolet visible (UV-Vis) analysis. The results proved that GO was successfully oxidized from graphite whereas RGO was effectively reduced from GO.



6 May 2019 in Journal of Polymers and the Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHM. Hasan
M. Hasan
TLTze Kiat Lai
Tze Kiat Lai
DGDeepu A. Gopakumar
Deepu A. Gopakumar
Mohammad JawaidMohammad Jawaid
Mohammad Jawaid
FOF. A. T. Owolabi
F. A. T. Owolabi
Abdul Khalil H. P. S.Abdul Khalil H. P. S.
Abdul Khalil H. P. S.

21 July 2016 in Journal of Applied Polymer Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RHRosniza Hamzah
Rosniza Hamzah
MBMohamad Abu Bakar
Mohamad Abu Bakar
ODOmar S. Dahham
Omar S. Dahham
NZNik Noriman Zulkepli
Nik Noriman Zulkepli
SDSaad Sabbar Dahham
Saad Sabbar Dahham

16 April 2014 in Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STSam Sung Ting
Sam Sung Ting
MNM. A. Nuradibah
M. A. Nuradibah
HIH. Ismail
H. Ismail
NZNik Noriman Zulkepli
Nik Noriman Zulkepli
SRS. Ragunathan
S. Ragunathan
This article reviews the recent advances made in polyolefin and natural polymer blends used for packaging applications, with a focus on their degradation. Nondegradable polymers are now considered as a serious environmental problem, and they have become an enormous challenge to waste management. Hence, the degradable polymers are practical solutions to reduce the municipal solid waste (MSW) caused by the use of nondegradable polymers. These degradable options can be produced from three kinds of natural sources:- (1) polysaccharides—starch, cellulose, chitin and chitosan; (2) proteins—soya, wheat gluten, collagen/gelatine; and (3) speciality polymers—such as lignin, natural rubber. One major challenge to producing a degradable blend with the desired properties is merging the hydrophilic characteristics of natural polymers with the hydrophobic characteristics of polyolefin. The aim of this review is to offer a complete overview of polyolefin/natural polymer blends researched for packaging applications.