Diego Lima Medeiros

Dr. Diego Lima Medeiros

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2015 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDiego Lima Medeiros
Diego Lima Medeiros
ESEMERSON SALES
EMERSON SALES
AKAsher Kiperstok
Asher Kiperstok

10 August 2022 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDiego Lima Medeiros
Diego Lima Medeiros
ÍMÍcaro Thiago Andrade Moreira
Ícaro Thiago Andrade Moreira

1 April 2020 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDiego Lima Medeiros
Diego Lima Medeiros
LQLuciano Queiroz
Luciano Queiroz
ESEduardo Cohim Silva
Eduardo Cohim Silva
JAJosé Adolfo de Almeida-Neto
José Adolfo de Almeida-Neto
AKAsher Kiperstok
Asher Kiperstok

1 January 2018 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJuliano Lopes
Juliano Lopes
DMDiego Lima Medeiros
Diego Lima Medeiros
AKAsher Kiperstok
Asher Kiperstok

17 October 2023 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GPGiusilene Costa de Souza Pinho
Giusilene Costa de Souza Pinho
JCJoão Luiz Calmon
João Luiz Calmon
DMDiego Lima Medeiros
Diego Lima Medeiros
DVDarli Rodrigues Vieira
Darli Rodrigues Vieira
ABAlencar Bravo
Alencar Bravo
Proper management of wood waste (WW) from the furniture industry has become an important issue. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) is a tool that is widely used for identifying environmental gains in WW management strategies. Thus, the aim of this research was to perform a comparative LCA, analyzing the environmental aspects and impacts of different WW management scenarios generated in the furniture industry in the state of Espirito Santo, Brazil. To conduct the study, five scenarios were designed: medium-density fiberboard (MDF) production (Scenario 1), medium-density particleboard (MDP) production (Scenario 2), solid ceramic brick production (Scenario 3), heat production in the ceramics industry (Scenario 4), and landfill disposal (Scenario 5). The results showed that compared to Scenarios 3 and 4, Scenarios 1 and 2 are potentially more favorable for disposing of WW. Scenario 1 achieved more environmental benefits in all of the impact categories evaluated. Notably, 1 m3 of MDF stores 1080 kg CO2 eq/m3, which results in a net impact of −849 kg CO2 eq/m3 of MDF. Scenario 5 is the least favorable practice. This research designs scenarios that contribute to reductions in the demand for virgin sources and increases in environmental gains.

31 January 2024 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JJJosé Oduque Nascimento de Jesus
José Oduque Nascimento de Jesus
DMDiego Lima Medeiros
Diego Lima Medeiros
KEKarla Patrícia Santos Oliveira Rodriguez Esquerre
Karla Patrícia Santos Oliveira Rodriguez Esquerre
Oz SahinOz Sahin
Oz Sahin
WAWanderbeg Correia de Araujo
Wanderbeg Correia de Araujo
Water extracted from natural sources often requires treatment to meet the quality standards necessary for industrial use, involving physico-chemical processes such as coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation. Inorganic coagulants, such as aluminum sulfate, are commonly used, although they generate a sludge with residual aluminum, classified as hazardous waste. Given this, biocoagulants, such as natural tannin-based polymers, have emerged as a promising alternative. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the environmental performance of water treatment and sludge disposal at an industrial water treatment plant (WTP) of an oil refinery located in Brazil using aluminum sulfate and biocoagulant. The WTP of this study is located in the state of Bahia, Brazil, and is supplied by a surface water body, the Paraguaçu River—Lago de Pedra do Cavalo—which comes from a semi-arid region, and a lake called Catu Korea. The environmental analysis was carried out using the life cycle assessment (LCA) method, using the methodological framework recommended in ISO 14044, followed by economic analysis and circular economy analysis. The inventory used in the analyses contains field data, company records, related literature, and ecoinvent database version 3.3. The impact assessment considered the ILCD 2011 Midpoint+ method package, the AWARE method, and the cumulative energy demand (CED) method in SimaPro 8.4 software. The comparative results showed the greatest impacts in the Energy Demand, Water Footprint, Eutrophication, and Land Use categories for the biocoagulant scenario, in contrast to the Human Toxicity, Acidification, Ecotoxicity, Particulate Matter, Carbon Footprint, and Abiotic Depletion categories for aluminum sulfate. The economic analysis showed that 65% of the operational costs for material and energy inputs in water treatment are due to the use of electricity, and the water pumping stage is the biggest contributor to this consumption. Even though the price of the biocoagulant was identified as eight times that of aluminum sulfate, the water treatment cost with the biocoagulant was 21% higher compared to that with aluminum sulphate. In this regard, circular economy propositions for sludge valorization are discussed for use, recycling, or proper disposal. Thus, the environmental and economic analysis in this study offers insights into eco-efficiency promotion in water treatment and sludge management.