Objective To investigate the impact of cumulative cisplatin dose on clinical outcomes in locally advanced cervical cancer patients undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 654 patients with stage IB3–IVA disease treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Radiotherapy was applied as external beam pelvic with or without para-aortic radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Concomitant chemotherapy was in the form of weekly or 3 weekly cisplatin. Data on demographics, treatment protocols, cumulative cisplatin dose, adverse effects, and survival outcomes were collected. Statistical analyses, including univariate and multivariate Cox regression models, were used to assess factors influencing progression free survival and overall survival. Results The median cumulative cisplatin dose was 210 mg (range 40–320), and ≥200 mg in 503 (76.9%) patients. Median follow-up was 35 months (range 1–150). The 5 year progression free survival and overall survival rates were 66.9% and 77.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified poor performance status, non-squamous cell histology, presence of lymph node metastases, and hemoglobin <10 g/dL before chemoradiotherapy as poor prognostic factors for both progression free survival and overall survival in the whole group. When stage III cases were evaluated separately, the cumulative cisplatin dose 200 mg, particularly in patients with lymph node metastases, significantly improved overall survival. Factors such as anemia, toxicity related challenges, and comorbidities were identified as critical considerations in treatment planning. These findings emphasize the balance between maximizing therapeutic efficacy and managing toxicity, guiding personalized treatment approaches for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Purpose: N3 gastric cancer is characterized by a fairly high lymph node metastasis burden and poor outcome despite optimal therapy. Given the limitations of TNM classification, a comprehensive evaluation tool is necessary to predict the prognosis of patients with N3 gastric cancer who underwent curative surgery. This study aims to explore the outcomes and clinicopathologic prognostic factors affecting the overall survival (OS) of patients with N3 gastric cancer after surgery. Methods: Data on patients with N3 gastric cancer who underwent (sub)total gastrectomy and regional lymph node dissection between November 2005 and September 2018 (n = 169) were analyzed by Cox regression to determine the independent prognostic factors for OS. Results: The multivariable analysis established that gender, patient performance status, metastatic lymph node ratio (MLNR), tumor grade, and adjuvant chemotherapy are significantly associated with OS. The five-year OS of the study population was 15%. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was applied to 72% of the patients, which resulted in an improvement in recurrence-free survival but not OS. Recurrence occurred in 103 (75%) patients, in which the most frequent recurrence site was distant metastasis. Conclusion: Male gender, poor performance status, grade 3 tumor, MLNR > 0.37, and not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy are predictors of poor prognosis in N3 gastric cancer after curative resection. Considering the high recurrence rates of this group, prospective studies are needed to optimize treatment strategies.

Background and Objectives: Anorectal malignant melanoma (ARMM) is a rare and aggressive mucosal melanoma with a poor prognosis. Due to its rarity and nonspecific clinical presentation, diagnosis is often delayed, and prognostic data remain limited. Methods: In this retrospective study, 17 patients diagnosed with ARMM were identified from a cohort of 404 malignant melanoma cases treated at our center; however, only 14 patients with complete clinical and pathological data were included in the final analysis. Demographic, clinical, and histopathological data were collected. Disease stage, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated, and potential prognostic factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: The mean age at diagnosis was 58 ± 12 years, and six patients (42.9%) were female. The median follow-up duration was 13.3 months, and the median OS was 12.6 months. Six patients (42.9%) were initially misdiagnosed due to overlapping symptoms with benign anorectal conditions. At presentation, seven patients had localized disease, while six had distant metastases. Univariate analysis identified male sex and liver metastasis as adverse prognostic factors for OS; however, these associations were not statistically significant in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: ARMM is associated with poor survival outcomes, and liver metastasis and male sex may be linked to worse prognosis. Diagnostic delay is common due to nonspecific symptoms and frequent initial misdiagnosis, highlighting the need for increased clinical awareness. Further large-scale studies are warranted to better define prognostic markers and optimize management strategies.