Active distribution systems (ADS) are increasingly strained by rising energy demand and the widespread deployment of distributed energy resources (DERs) and electric vehicle charging stations (EVCS), which intensify voltage deviations, power losses, and peak demand fluctuations. This study develops a coordinated optimization framework for Mobile Battery Energy Storage Systems (MBESS) and Dynamic Feeder Reconfiguration (DFR) to enhance network performance across technical, economic, and environmental dimensions. A Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III (NSGA-III) is employed to minimize six objectives the active and reactive power losses, voltage deviation index (VDI), voltage stability index (FVSI), operating cost, and CO₂ emissions while explicitly modeling the MBESS transportation constraints such as energy consumption and single-trip mobility within coupled IEEE 33-bus and 33-node transport networks, which provide realistic mobility modeling of energy storage operations. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is applied to select compromise solutions from Pareto fronts. Simulation results across six scenarios show that the coordinated MBESS–DFR operation reduces power losses by 27.8–30.1%, improves the VDI by 40.5–43.2%, and enhances the FVSI by 2.3–2.4%, maintaining all bus voltages within 0.95–1.05 p.u. with minimal cost (0.26–0.27%) and emission variations (0.31–0.71%). The MBESS alone provided limited benefits (5–12%), confirming that coordination is essential for improving efficiency, voltage regulation, and overall system sustainability in renewable-rich distribution networks.

The rapid adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) and the increasing use of photovoltaic (PV) generation have introduced new operational challenges for unbalanced power distribution systems. These include elevated power losses, voltage imbalances, and adverse environmental impacts. This study proposed a hybrid objective optimization framework to address these issues by minimizing real and reactive power losses, voltage deviations, voltage imbalance indexes, and CO₂ emissions. Nineteen simulation cases were analyzed under various configurations incorporating EV integration, PV deployment, reactive power compensation, and zonal control strategies. An improved gray wolf optimizer (IGWO) was employed to determine optimal placements and control settings. Among all cases, Case 16 yielded the lowest objective function value, representing the most effective trade-off between technical performance, voltage stability, and sustainability. The optimized configuration significantly improved the voltage balance, reduced system losses, and maintained the average voltage within acceptable limits. Additionally, all optimized scenarios achieved meaningful reductions in CO₂ emissions compared to the base case. The results were validated with an objective function $\left(F_{best}\right)$ as a reliable composite performance index and demonstrated the effectiveness of coordinated zone-based optimization. This approach provides practical insights for future smart grid planning under dynamic, renewable, rich, and EV-dominated operating conditions.

This study presents a comprehensive multi-objective optimization framework for optimal placement and sizing of distributed generation (DG) units in electric bus (E-bus) transit systems integrated with a high-power flash charging infrastructure. An enhanced Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer (MOGWO), utilizing Euclidean distance-based Pareto ranking, is developed to minimize power loss, voltage deviation, and voltage violations. The framework incorporates realistic E-bus operation characteristics, including a 31-stop, 62 km route, 600 kW pantograph flash chargers, and dynamic load profiles over a 90 min simulation period. Statistical evaluation on IEEE 33-bus and 69-bus distribution networks demonstrates that MOGWO consistently outperforms MOPSO and NSGA-II across all DG deployment scenarios. In the three-DG configuration, MOGWO achieved minimum power losses of 0.0279 MW and 0.0179 MW, and voltage deviations of 0.1313 and 0.1362 in the 33-bus and 69-bus systems, respectively, while eliminating voltage violations. The proposed method also demonstrated superior solution quality with low variance and faster convergence, requiring under 7 h of computation on average. A five-method compromise solution strategy, including TOPSIS and Lp-metric, enabled transparent and robust decision-making. The findings confirm the proposed framework’s effectiveness and scalability for enhancing distribution system performance under the demands of electric transit electrification and smart grid integration.