The adoption of preventive management decisions is crucial to dealing with metabolic impairments in dairy cattle. Various serum metabolites are known to be useful indicators of the health status of cows. In this study, we used milk Fourier-transform mid-infrared (FTIR) spectra and various machine learning (ML) algorithms to develop prediction equations for a panel of 29 blood metabolites, including those related to energy metabolism, liver function/hepatic damage, oxidative stress, inflammation/innate immunity, and minerals. For most traits, the data set comprised observations from 1,204 Holstein-Friesian dairy cows belonging to 5 herds. An exception was represented by β-hydroxybutyrate prediction, which contained observations from 2,701 multibreed cows pertaining to 33 herds. The best predictive model was developed using an automatic ML algorithm that tested various methods, including elastic net, distributed random forest, gradient boosting machine, artificial neural network, and stacking ensemble. These ML predictions were compared with partial least squares regression, the most commonly used method for FTIR prediction of blood traits. Performance of each model was evaluated using 2 cross-validation (CV) scenarios: 5-fold random (CV_r) and herd-out (CV_h). We also tested the best model's ability to classify values precisely in the 2 extreme tails, namely, the 25th (Q25) and 75th (Q75) percentiles (true-positive prediction scenario). Compared with partial least squares regression, ML algorithms achieved more accurate performance. Specifically, elastic net increased the R² value from 5% to 75% for CV_r and 2% to 139% for CV_h, whereas the stacking ensemble increased the R² value from 4% to 70% for CV_r and 4% to 150% for CV_h. Considering the best model, with the CV_r scenario, good prediction accuracies were obtained for glucose (R² = 0.81), urea (R² = 0.73), albumin (R² = 0.75), total reactive oxygen metabolites (R² = 0.79), total thiol groups (R² = 0.76), ceruloplasmin (R² = 0.74), total proteins (R² = 0.81), globulins (R² = 0.87), and Na (R² = 0.72). Good prediction accuracy in classifying extreme values was achieved for glucose (Q25 = 70.8%, Q75 = 69.9%), albumin (Q25 = 72.3%), total reactive oxygen metabolites (Q25 = 75.1%, Q75 = 74%), thiol groups (Q75 = 70.4%), total proteins (Q25 = 72.4%, Q75 = 77.2.%), globulins (Q25 = 74.8%, Q75 = 81.5%), and haptoglobin (Q75 = 74.4%). In conclusion, our study shows that FTIR spectra can be used to predict blood metabolites with relatively good accuracy, depending on trait, and are a promising tool for large-scale monitoring.

A survey on feedlot performance of purebred and crossbred European young bulls and heifers managed under intensive conditions in Veneto, northeast Italy

The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between differential somatic cell count (DSCC) and milk quality and udder health traits, and for the first time, between DSCC and milk coagulation properties and cheesemaking traits in a population of 1,264 Holstein cows reared in northern Italy. Differential somatic cell count represents the combined proportions of polymorphonuclear neutrophils plus lymphocytes (PMN-LYM) in the total somatic cell count (SCC), with macrophages (MAC) making up the remaining proportion. The milk traits investigated in this study were milk yield (MY), 8 traits related to milk composition and quality (fat, protein, casein, casein index, lactose, urea, pH, and milk conductivity), 9 milk coagulation traits [3 milk coagulation properties (MCP) and 6 curd firming (CF) traits], 7 cheesemaking traits, 3 cheese yield (CY) traits, and 4 milk nutrient recovery in the curd (REC) traits. A linear mixed model was fitted to explore the associations between SCS combined with DSCC and the aforementioned milk traits. An additional model was run, which included DSCC expressed as the PMN-LYM and MAC counts, obtained by multiplying the percentage of PMN-LYM and MAC by SCC in the milk for each cow in the data set. The unfavorable association between SCS and milk quality and technological traits was confirmed. Increased DSCC was instead associated with a linear increase in MY, casein index, and lactose proportion and a linear decrease in milk fat and milk conductivity. Accordingly, DSCC was favorably associated with all MCP and CF traits (with the exception of the time needed to achieve maximum, CF), particularly with rennet coagulation time, and it always displayed linear relationships. Differential somatic cell count was also positively associated with the recovery of milk nutrients in the curd (protein, fat, and energy), which increased linearly with increasing DSCC. The PMN-LYM count was rarely associated with milk traits, even though the pattern observed confirmed the results obtained when both SCS and DSCC were included in the model. The MAC count, however, showed the opposite pattern: MY, casein index, and lactose percentage decreased and milk conductivity increased with an increasing MAC count. No significant association was found between PMN-LYM count and MCP, CF, CY, and REC traits, whereas MAC count was unfavorably associated with MCP, CF traits, some CY traits, and all REC traits. Our results showed that the combined information derived from SCS and DSCC might be useful to monitor milk quality and cheesemaking-related traits.

Cheese-making traits in dairy cattle are important to the dairy industry but are difficult to measure at the individual level because there are limitations on collecting phenotypic information. Mid-infrared spectroscopy has its advantages, but it can only be used during monthly milk recordings. Recently, in-line devices for real-time analysis of milk quality have been developed. The AfiLab recording system (Afimilk) offers significant benefits as phenotypes can be collected from each cow at each milking session. The objective of this study was to assess the potential of integrating AfiLab real-time milk analyzer measures with the stacking ensemble learning technique using heterogeneous base learners for the in-line daily monitoring of cheese-making traits in Holstein cattle with a view to developing a precision livestock farming system for monitoring the technological quality of milk. Data and samples for wet-laboratory analyses were collected from 499 Holstein cows belonging to 2 farms where the AfiLab system was installed. The traits of concern were 9 milk coagulation traits [3 milk coagulation properties (MCP), and 6 curd firming traits (CF_t)], and 7 cheese-making traits [3 cheese yield (CY) traits, and 4 milk nutrient recovery in the curd (REC) traits]. The near-infrared AfiLab spectral data and on-farm information (days in milk and parity) were used to assess the predictive ability of different statistical methods [elastic net (EN), gradient boosting machine (GBM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and artificial neural network (ANN)] across different cross-validation scenarios. These statistical methods were considered the base learners, which were then combined in a stacking ensemble learning. Results indicate that including information on the cows (days in milk and parity) in the AfiLab infrared prediction increased its accuracy by 10.3% for traditional MCP, 13.8% for curd firming, 9.8% for CY, and 11.2% for REC traits compared with those obtained from near-infrared AfiLab alone. The statistical approaches exhibited high prediction accuracies (R²) averaged across the cross-validation scenarios for traditional MCP (0.58 for ANN, 0.55 for EN and GBM, 0.52 for XGBoost, and 0.62 for stacking ensemble), CF_t (0.55 for ANN, 0.54 for EN and GBM, 0.53 for XGBoost, and 0.61 for stacking ensemble), and similar R² averages for CY and REC (0.55 for ANN, 0.54 for EN and GBM, 0.53 for XGBoost, and 0.61 for stacking ensemble). The ANN approach was more accurate than the other base learners (EN, GBM, and XGBoost) and improved accuracy across cross-validation scenarios on average by 7% for traditional MCP, 5% for CF_t, 8% for CY, and 7% for REC. The stacking ensemble method improved prediction accuracy by 3% to 31% for traditional MCP, 2% to 26% for CF_t, 1% to 38% for CY traits, and 2% to 27% for REC traits compared with the base learners. The prediction accuracies of the different approaches evaluated tended to decrease from the 10-fold cross-validation to the independent validation scenario, although there was a smaller reduction in prediction accuracy with the stacking ensemble learning technique across all the cross-validation scenarios. Our results show that combining in-line on-farm information with stacking ensemble machine learning represents an effective alternative for obtaining robust daily predictions of milk cheese-making traits.