Micro-organisms are abundant in nature and can also be found in hospital settings, causing high rates of infections. This study aimed to identify bacteria isolated from a veterinary hospital, as well as to perform antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the disk diffusion method (Kirby–Bauer), biofilm production tests using 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates and crystal violet dye, and genetic analysis of the ica operon of Staphylococcus isolates. Three collections were made from eleven surfaces and objects in the hospital’s non-critical areas (general areas) and critical areas (surgical center), totaling thirty-three samples. A total of 66 different bacterial isolates were obtained, with 77% (51/66) Gram-positive and 23% (29/66) Gram-negative. Resistance profiles were found for multidrug-resistance (MDR), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE), and other unidentified species of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative (MRCNS) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), as well as biofilm production rates of 57% (38/66) of the isolates. Analysis of the operon genes for Staphylococcus sp. showed divergence in some samples when compared to the phenotypic test performed. In summary, there is a high presence of micro-organisms with resistance and virulence factors spread throughout the various areas of the veterinary hospital.

Microorganisms are abundantly dispersed in nature and can also be found in hospital environments, causing high rates of infections. This study aims to identify bacteria isolated from a veterinary hospital as well as carry out antimicrobial susceptibility testing, biofilm production tests, and genetic analysis of the ica operon of the isolates. Three collections were carried out on 11 surfaces and objects from general areas and the hospital’s operating room, totaling 33 samples, with 66 different bacterial species isolated, 77% (51/66) of them gram-positive and 23% (29/66) gram-negative. MDR, MRSA, MRS and ESBL resistance profiles were found, as well as biofilm production rates of 57% (38/66) of the isolates. Analysis of operon genes for Staphylococcus sp. demonstrated divergence in some samples when compared to the phenotypic test performed. In summary, there is a high presence of microorganisms with resistance and virulence factors spread throughout the various facilities of the veterinary hospital.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of surgical instruments’ manual cleaning versus automated cleaning in an ultrasonic cleaner for the removal of biofilms on surgical forceps contaminated with Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Subsequently, the residual microbial load was quantified through microbiological culture, aiming to evaluate the effectiveness of biofilm removal under different reprocessing conditions. Cleaning is an essential step in the processing of surgical instruments to ensure the effective removal of dirt and microorganisms. Through adhesion, microorganisms can attach to surfaces and form biofilms, organized structures surrounded by an extracellular matrix consisting of various components, which favor metabolic exchanges, adaptation, resistance, and bacterial dispersion. These biofilms increase the pathogenic potential of microorganisms, contributing to the occurrence of Healthcare-Associated Infections, and to avoid these, it is essential that preventive measures aimed at microbial reduction are adopted. Automated cleaning proved more effective than manual cleaning, and the combined approach achieved the greatest microbial reduction, though persistent contamination was still observed. The ability of adhesion and biofilm formation on the surfaces of surgical instruments is regarded as a challenge for complete microbial removal. These findings enhance the need for more rigorous reprocessing protocols and complementary strategies to ensure greater safety in the use of reusable instruments in clinical practice.