This study aims to assess and compare the impact of Monolithic Zirconia (MZ) and In-Ceram Zirconia (ZP) superstructures on stress distribution within implants and D2/D4 bone densities under 200 N vertical and oblique occlusal loads using three-dimensional finite element analysis via ANSYS WORKBENCH R2. The analysis employed maximum and minimum von Mises stress values. Modeling an implant (4.2 mm diameter, 10 mm length) and abutment (0.47 mm diameter), with an 8 mm diameter and 6 mm length single crown, the research identified lower von Mises stresses in D2 cancellous bone with the MZ model under vertical loading. Conversely, under oblique loading, the ZP model exhibited maximum von Mises stresses in D4 bone around the implant. This underscores the critical need to consider physical and mechanical properties, beyond mere aesthetics, for sustained implant success. The findings highlight the effect of material composition and stress distribution, emphasizing the necessity of durable and effective implant treatments.

Restorative dentistry is the repairing of damaged teeth and restoring oral health and function. Dental implants are typically placed within the cortical bone of the jaw to provide stability and support for prosthetic restorations. The successful restoration of complex anatomical features of the maxillary anterior is difficult for prosthodontists. Using a 3D slicer, CT scan images were used to create a detailed three-dimensional model of the maxilla bone. This study utilizes ANSYS Workbench, a finite element software program, to analyze the abutment angles, ranging from 0° to 25°, and the impact stress distribution within peri-implant bone. The outcomes of our studies align with and substantiate certain evidence in the literature documenting bone resorption, specifically at the level of the implant neck and near the cortical bone. The study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of angled abutment stress patterns in the bone surrounding dental implants, offering valuable insights for clinical applications in critical areas of the mouth.

In dental implant insertion, an artificial foundation is prepared for the prosthetic device, which involves the surgical positioning of the implant in the jaw bone. The success of dental implants relies on the osseointegration process. The biomechanical factors, such as stress and strain, developed during the insertion affect the jawbone and its surroundings. In this current study, the stresses during the implant insertion in the mandibular jawbone bone are analyzed using three-dimensional explicit dynamic analysis, and the Cowper–Symonds model is implemented with the damage model. The implant’s design has a substantial impact on stress distribution within the cancellous bone during the insertion procedure. The stress variation takes place as the implant moves into the pre-drilled hole. This is because of the contact between the bone and the fixture on the implant. The upper edge of the predrilled site shows that the stresses are more at the crestal region of the implant due to surface area. There is a gradual increase in the stress level as the implant reaches the lower edge from the top edge. This is because of the concept of mechanical interlocking. Clinicians can use this information to anticipate and address potential stress-related challenges during implant placement.

Giant cell fibroma is a benign oral fibrous tumour. The clinical appearance of majority of non-neoplastic fibrous growths is similar, but unique histopathological features of giant cell fibroma aid in its final diagnosis. It usually manifests as an asymptomatic, sessile or pedunculated mass usually less than 1 cm in diameter. In this case report, we highlight a case of giant cell fibroma in a 58-year-old male patient, which had an unusual size with associated pain. Although giant cell fibromas are benign lesions, it is important for dentists to be aware of this lesion based on its frequency of occurrence and need for its accurate diagnosis.

Background/Objectives: This study investigates stress distribution in cancellous bone during pilot drilling for dental implants using the Cowper–Symonds model. Understanding the biomechanical effects of drilling parameters on bone health is essential for optimizing implant stability and longevity. Methods: A finite element analysis (FEA) approach was employed to simulate the pilot drilling process in cancellous bone. A three-dimensional jawbone model was developed from CT scan data, processed using 3D Slicer, and refined with CAD tools. The drilling simulation incorporated a rigid pilot drill and flexible cancellous bone, utilizing explicit dynamic methods. Stress distribution was evaluated for drilling depths ranging from 6 mm to 16 mm, with mesh density and strain rate effects considered to ensure accuracy. Results: The results showed an increase in stress levels with drilling depth, with maximum stress recorded at 16 mm. Initial contact stress was 17.3 MPa, rising to 228.9 MPa at deeper penetration due to increased interaction between the drill and bone. Stress distribution patterns emphasized the critical role of drilling depth and design parameters in mitigating bone damage. Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of optimized drilling protocols and pilot drill design to reduce stress and preserve bone integrity. The findings provide valuable insights into improving implant procedures and demonstrate the utility of FEA as a robust tool for evaluating biomechanical impacts during implant placement. Future research should incorporate cortical bone and thermal effects for a comprehensive analysis.