Davide Fontanarosa

Prof. Dr. Davide Fontanarosa

School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, 4000 Brisbane, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 March 2016 in Physics in Medicine & Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TOTuathan O’shea
Tuathan O’shea
Jeffrey BamberJeffrey Bamber
Jeffrey Bamber
Davide FontanarosaDavide Fontanarosa
Davide Fontanarosa
SMSkadi van der Meer
Skadi van der Meer
FVFrank Verhaegen
Frank Verhaegen
EHEmma Harris
Emma Harris
Imaging has become an essential tool in modern radiotherapy (RT), being used to plan dose delivery prior to treatment and verify target position before and during treatment. Ultrasound (US) imaging is cost-effective in providing excellent contrast at high resolution for depicting soft tissue targets apart from those shielded by the lungs or cranium. As a result, it is increasingly used in RT setup verification for the measurement of inter-fraction motion, the subject of Part I of this review (Fontanarosa et al 2015 Phys. Med. Biol. 60 R77-114). The combination of rapid imaging and zero ionising radiation dose makes US highly suitable for estimating intra-fraction motion. The current paper (Part II of the review) covers this topic. The basic technology for US motion estimation, and its current clinical application to the prostate, is described here, along with recent developments in robust motion-estimation algorithms, and three dimensional (3D) imaging. Together, these are likely to drive an increase in the number of future clinical studies and the range of cancer sites in which US motion management is applied. Also reviewed are selections of existing and proposed novel applications of US imaging to RT. These are driven by exciting developments in structural, functional and molecular US imaging and analytical techniques such as backscatter tissue analysis, elastography, photoacoustography, contrast-specific imaging, dynamic contrast analysis, microvascular and super-resolution imaging, and targeted microbubbles. Such techniques show promise for predicting and measuring the outcome of RT, quantifying normal tissue toxicity, improving tumour definition and defining a biological target volume that describes radiation sensitive regions of the tumour. US offers easy, low cost and efficient integration of these techniques into the RT workflow. US contrast technology also has potential to be used actively to assist RT by manipulating the tumour cell environment and by improving the delivery of radiosensitising agents. Finally, US imaging offers various ways to measure dose in 3D. If technical problems can be overcome, these hold potential for wide-dissemination of cost-effective pre-treatment dose verification and in vivo dose monitoring methods. It is concluded that US imaging could eventually contribute to all aspects of the RT workflow.

16 January 2015 in Physics in Medicine & Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Davide FontanarosaDavide Fontanarosa
Davide Fontanarosa
SMSkadi van der Meer
Skadi van der Meer
Jeffrey BamberJeffrey Bamber
Jeffrey Bamber
EHEmma Harris
Emma Harris
TOTuathan O’sHea
Tuathan O’sHea
FVFrank Verhaegen
Frank Verhaegen
In modern radiotherapy, verification of the treatment to ensure the target receives the prescribed dose and normal tissues are optimally spared has become essential. Several forms of image guidance are available for this purpose. The most commonly used forms of image guidance are based on kilovolt or megavolt x-ray imaging. Image guidance can also be performed with non-harmful ultrasound (US) waves. This increasingly used technique has the potential to offer both anatomical and functional information. This review presents an overview of the historical and current use of two-dimensional and three-dimensional US imaging for treatment verification in radiotherapy. The US technology and the implementation in the radiotherapy workflow are described. The use of US guidance in the treatment planning process is discussed. The role of US technology in inter-fraction motion monitoring and management is explained, and clinical studies of applications in areas such as the pelvis, abdomen and breast are reviewed. A companion review paper (O’Shea et al 2015 Phys. Med. Biol. submitted) will extensively discuss the use of US imaging for intra-fraction motion quantification and novel applications of US technology to RT.

2 January 2020 in Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JMJessica Benitez Mendieta
Jessica Benitez Mendieta
Davide FontanarosaDavide Fontanarosa
Davide Fontanarosa
Jiaqiu WangJiaqiu Wang
Jiaqiu Wang
PPPhani Kumari Paritala
Phani Kumari Paritala
TMTim McGahan
Tim McGahan
ZLZhiyong Li
Zhiyong Li

1 February 2020 in Medical Image Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMatteo Dunnhofer
Matteo Dunnhofer
MAMaria Antico
Maria Antico
FSFumio Sasazawa
Fumio Sasazawa
YTYu Takeda
Yu Takeda
SCSaskia Camps
Saskia Camps
Davide FontanarosaDavide Fontanarosa
Davide Fontanarosa

1 May 2019 in Medical Image Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMaria Antico
Maria Antico
FSFumio Sasazawa
Fumio Sasazawa
LWLiao Wu
Liao Wu
AJAnjali Jaiprakash
Anjali Jaiprakash
JRJonathan Roberts
Jonathan Roberts
Davide FontanarosaDavide Fontanarosa
Davide Fontanarosa

1 March 2021 in Physica Medica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CTChung-Han Tsai
Chung-Han Tsai
JBJeroen van der Burgt
Jeroen van der Burgt
DVDamjan Vukovic
Damjan Vukovic
NKNancy Kaur
Nancy Kaur
LDLibertario Demi
Libertario Demi
Davide FontanarosaDavide Fontanarosa
Davide Fontanarosa