Adolfo Di Fiore

Dr. Adolfo Di Fiore

School of Dentistry, Department of Neurosciences, Section of Prosthodontics and Digital Dentistry, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2019 in Journal of Prosthodontic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Adolfo Di FioreAdolfo Di Fiore
Adolfo Di Fiore
RMRoberto Meneghello
Roberto Meneghello
LGLorenzo Graiff
Lorenzo Graiff
GSGianpaolo Savio
Gianpaolo Savio
PVPaolo Vigolo
Paolo Vigolo
ESEdoardo Stellini
Edoardo Stellini
Compare the accuracy of intraoral digital impression in full-arch implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis acquired with eight different intraoral scanner (Ios). A polymethyl methacrylate acrylic model of an edentulous mandible with six scan-abutment was used as a master model and its dimensions measured with a coordinate measuring machine. Eight different Ios were used to generate digital impression: True Definition, Trios, Cerec Omnicam, 3D progress, CS3500, CS3600, Planmeca Emelard and Dental Wings. Fifteen digital impressions were made. A software called "Scan-abut" was developed to analyse and compare the digital impression with the master model, obtaining the scanning accuracy. The three-dimensional (3D) position and distance analysis were performed. Mean value of the 3D position analysis showed that the True Definition (31 μm ± 8 μm) and Trios (32 μm ± 5 μm) have the best performance of the group. The Cerec Omnicam (71 μm ± 55 μm), CS3600 (61 μm ± 14 μm) have an average performance. The CS3500 (107 μm ± 28 μm) and Planmeca Emelard (101 μm ± 38 μm) present a middle-low performance, while the 3D progress (344 μm ± 121 μm) and Dental Wings (148 μm ± 64 μm) show the low performance. The 3D distance analysis showed a good linear relationship between the errors and scan-abutment distance only with the True Definition and CS3600. Not all scanners are suitable for digital impression in full-arch implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis and the weight of the output files is independent from the accuracy of the Ios.

1 January 2022 in Journal of Prosthodontic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Adolfo Di FioreAdolfo Di Fiore
Adolfo Di Fiore
RMRoberto Meneghello
Roberto Meneghello
PBPaola Brun
Paola Brun
SRStefano Rosso
Stefano Rosso
AGAlberto Gattazzo
Alberto Gattazzo
BYBurak Yilmaz
Burak Yilmaz
Purpose: To compare the flexural properties and the adhesion of Lactobacillus salivarius (LS), Streptococcus mutans (SM), and Candida albicans (CA) on heat-polymerized (CV), CAD-CAM milled (CAD), or 3D-printed (3D) Poly (methylmethacrylate) (PMMA).Methods: Ultimate Flexural Strength (UFS), Flexural Strain (FS) (%) at Flexural Strength, and Flexural Modulus (FM) of specimens (65.0×10.0×3.3 mm) from each PMMA group (n=6) were calculated by using the 3-point bending test. The surface roughness profiles (R) were measured before and after polishing with a contact profilometer. LS, SM, and CA adhesion on PMMA specimens (n=18) (10 mm in diameter, 3 mm in height) was assessed after 90 minutes and 16 hours by using scanning electron microscopy. The Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc analysis was performed to compare the groups (alpha=0.05).Results: Mean UFS values were 80.79±7.64 MPa for CV, 110.23±5.03 MPa for CAD, and 87.34±6.39 MPa for 3D. Mean FS values were 4.37±1.04% for CV, 4.71±0.62% for CAD, and 6.19±0.13 % for 3D. Mean FM values were 2542±301 MPa for CV, 3435±346 MPa for CAD, and 2371±197 MPa for 3D. CAD had the lowest average R value (0.29±0.16 µm) before polishing, and bacterial adhesion after 90 minutes of incubation. R value and microbial adhesion were not different amongst groups after polishing and 16 hours of incubation, respectively.Conclusion: The CAD group displayed the best flexural properties, except for FS, the lowest roughness before polishing and bacterial adhesion after 90 minutes of incubation. All tested PMMAs had similar surface roughness after polishing, and microbial adhesion after 16 hours of incubation.

1 June 2011 in Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSStefano Sivolella
Stefano Sivolella
MBMario Berengo
Mario Berengo
EBEriberto Bressan
Eriberto Bressan
Adolfo Di FioreAdolfo Di Fiore
Adolfo Di Fiore
ESEdoardo Stellini
Edoardo Stellini

29 September 2019 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAntonio Arena
Antonio Arena
FPFrancesca Prete
Francesca Prete
ERElisa Rambaldi
Elisa Rambaldi
Maria Chiara BignozziMaria Chiara Bignozzi
Maria Chiara Bignozzi
CMCarlo Monaco
Carlo Monaco
Jérôme ChevalierJérôme Chevalier
Jérôme Chevalier
The objective of this paper is to review the current knowledge on the development of nanostructured zirconia-based ceramics and composites suitable for application in dentistry. Isi Web of Science, Science Direct, Scientific.net databases, and Google were searched electronically for the period of 1980 to the present, matching the keywords “nano” with the keywords: “Zirconia, ZrO2, Y-TZP, and dental, dentistry”. A total of 74 papers were found, with the majority coming from Asia, indicating a more active scientific interest on the topic in this geographic area, followed by Europe, South America, and North America. The research shows, even though the scientific activity on nanostructured ceramics was intense in the last fifteen years, the development of fully dense zirconia-based nanoceramics is yet at an initial stage, most of all from the point of view of the clinical applications. It has been demonstrated that nanostructured ceramics can show improved properties because of the reduction of the grain size to the nanoscale. This is also true for zirconia-based nanoceramics, where some improvements in mechanical, optical, as well as resistance in low-temperature degradation have been observed. Potential applications of this class of material in the dental field are discussed, summarizing the results of the latest scientific research.

27 July 2024 in The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Adolfo Di FioreAdolfo Di Fiore
Adolfo Di Fiore
ESEdoardo Stellini
Edoardo Stellini
OAOmar Alageel
Omar Alageel
AAAbdulaziz Alhotan
Abdulaziz Alhotan

17 August 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Adolfo Di FioreAdolfo Di Fiore
Adolfo Di Fiore
MMMattia Montagner
Mattia Montagner
SSStefano Sivolella
Stefano Sivolella
ESEdoardo Stellini
Edoardo Stellini
BYBurak Yilmaz
Burak Yilmaz
Giulia BrunelloGiulia Brunello
Giulia Brunello
The present review aimed to assess the possible relationship between occlusal overload and peri-implant bone loss. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched from January 1985 up to and including December 2021. The search strategy applied was: (dental OR oral) AND implants AND (overload OR excessive load OR occlusal wear) AND (bone loss OR peri-implantitis OR failure). Clinical studies that reported quantitative analysis of occlusal loads through digital contacts and/or occlusal wear were included. The studies were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. In total, 492 studies were identified in the search during the initial screening. Of those, 84 were subjected to full-text evaluation, and 7 fulfilled the inclusion criteria (4 cohort studies, 2 cross-sectional, and 1 case-control). Only one study used a digital device to assess excessive occlusal forces. Four out of seven studies reported a positive correlation between the overload and the crestal bone loss. All of the included studies had moderate to serious overall risk of bias, according to the ROBINS-I tool. In conclusion, the reported data relating the occlusal analysis to the peri-implant bone level seem to reveal an association, which must be further investigated using new digital tools that can help to standardize the methodology.