Jianfeng Xu

Jianfeng Xu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 March 2024 in International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jianguo ZhangJianguo Zhang
Jianguo Zhang
ZZZhengding Zheng
Zhengding Zheng
KHKai Huang
Kai Huang
CLChuangting Lin
Chuangting Lin
WHWeiqi Huang
Weiqi Huang
JXJianfeng Xu
Jianfeng Xu
Difficult-to-machine materials (DMMs) are extensively applied in critical fields such as aviation, semiconductor, biomedicine, and other key fields due to their excellent material properties. However, traditional machining technologies often struggle to achieve ultra-precision with DMMs resulting from poor surface quality and low processing efficiency. In recent years, field-assisted machining (FAM) technology has emerged as a new generation of machining technology based on innovative principles such as laser heating, tool vibration, magnetic magnetization, and plasma modification, providing a new solution for improving the machinability of DMMs. This technology not only addresses these limitations of traditional machining methods, but also has become a hot topic of research in the domain of ultra-precision machining of DMMs. Many new methods and principles have been introduced and investigated one after another, yet few studies have presented a comprehensive analysis and summarization. To fill this gap and understand the development trend of FAM, this study provides an important overview of FAM, covering different assisted machining methods, application effects, mechanism analysis, and equipment design. The current deficiencies and future challenges of FAM are summarized to lay the foundation for the further development of multi-field hybrid assisted and intelligent FAM technologies.

1 April 2020 in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WBWei Bai
Wei Bai
LSLiming Shu
Liming Shu
RSRonglei Sun
Ronglei Sun
JXJianfeng Xu
Jianfeng Xu
VSVadim V. Silberschmidt
Vadim V. Silberschmidt
NSNaohiko Sugita
Naohiko Sugita

13 December 2018 in IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TSTengjie Sui
Tengjie Sui
ZZZhixiang Zhao
Zhixiang Zhao
SXSiwei Xie
Siwei Xie
YXYangze Xie
Yangze Xie
YZYanyan Zhao
Yanyan Zhao
QPQiyu Peng
Qiyu Peng
We present a nonuniform multiphase (NUMP) method to construct a high-resolution time-to-digital converter (TDC) for low-cost field-programmable gate array (FPGA) devices. The NUMP method involves a system clock being passed through a series of delay elements to generate multiple clocks with different phase shifts. The phases of the rising and falling edges of all the clocks are sorted in order and the states of all the clocks are latched when a hit signal arrives. The sizes of the time bins (and precision) of the NUMP method are not limited by the uniformity and minimum value of the time delays of the delay lines. In theory, any delay sources with small jitters in an FPGA, not just very fine carry chains, can be used in the NUMP method to delay and randomize the clocks. Thus, the NUMP method can achieve excellent TDC timing resolutions in low-cost FPGAs without very fine delay lines. We implemented four NUMP TDC channels in a low-cost FPGA device (an Altera Cyclone V 5CEBA4F23C7N). The performance of the four NUMP TDCs was evaluated using both internal and external pulses. The root mean square (rms) for the timing resolution measured using the internal and the external pulses with short-time intervals (less than 1 ns) was 2.3 and 5.2 ps, respectively. A 14.1-ps rms timing resolution was measured at a time interval of 517 ns. The NUMP method is suitable for applications that require a number of high-performance TDC channels in a low-cost FPGA.

12 October 2021 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJinyang Ke
Jinyang Ke
XCXiao Chen
Xiao Chen
CLChanglin Liu
Changlin Liu
JZJianguo Zhang
Jianguo Zhang
HYHui Yang
Hui Yang
JXJianfeng Xu
Jianfeng Xu

15 September 2022 in Crystals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XYXin Yu
Xin Yu
Xi ZhangXi Zhang
Xi Zhang
HZHeng Zhang
Heng Zhang
HPHao Peng
Hao Peng
QRQiushi Ren
Qiushi Ren
SXSiwei Xie
Siwei Xie
Positron emission tomography (PET) is widely used in the diagnosis of tumors, cardiovascular system diseases, and neurological diseases. Scintillation crystals are an important part of PET scanners; they can convert γ photons into fluorescent photons to obtain their energy, time, and position information. Currently, an important research goal in PET is to find scintillation crystals with better performance. In this work, the principle of scintillation crystals is introduced, and the properties and requirements of scintillation crystals in different PET scanners are analyzed. At present, Lu2(1−x)Y2xSiO5 (LYSO) is the scintillation crystal with the best comprehensive properties. LaBr3 performs even better regarding the timing characteristics and light output; however, LaBr3 has not been used in any PET scanner because of its deliquescence. Detectors made of Gd3(Ga, Al)5O12 (GAGG) exhibit a high depth of interaction (DOI) resolution and have considerable application potential. The application fields of PET are constantly expanding, and its future development aims to achieve high spatial resolution and high sensitivity, which require scintillation crystals with better performance.

25 September 2020 in Crystals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SXSiwei Xie
Siwei Xie
Xi ZhangXi Zhang
Xi Zhang
YZYibin Zhang
Yibin Zhang
GYGaoyang Ying
Gaoyang Ying
QHQiu Huang
Qiu Huang
QPQiyu Peng
Qiyu Peng
The performance of radiation detectors used in positron-emission tomography (PET) is determined by the intrinsic properties of the scintillators, the geometry and surface treatment of the scintillator crystals and the electrical and optical characteristics of the photosensors. Experimental studies were performed to assess the timing resolution and energy resolution of detectors constructed with samples of different scintillator materials (LaBr3, CeBr3, LFS, LSO, LYSO: Ce, Ca and GAGG) that were fabricated into different shapes with various surface treatments. The saturation correction of SiPMs was applied for tested detectors based on a Tracepro simulation. Overall, we tested 28 pairs of different forms of scintillators to determine the one with the best CTR and light output. Two common high-performance silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) provided by SensL (J-series, 6 mm) or AdvanSiD (NUV, 6 mm) were used for photodetectors. The PET detector constructed with 6 mm CeBr3 cubes achieved the best CTR with a FWHM of 74 ps. The 4 mm co-doped LYSO: Ce, Ca pyramid crystals achieved 88.1 ps FWHM CTR. The 2 mm, 4 mm and 6 mm 0.2% Ce, 0.1% Ca co-doped LYSO cubes achieved 95.6 ps, 106 ps and 129 ps FWHM CTR, respectively. The scintillator crystals with unpolished surfaces had better timing than those with polished surfaces. The timing resolution was also improved by using certain geometric factors, such as a pyramid shape, to improve light transportation in the scintillator crystals.