Fabio Fantozzi

Prof. Fabio Fantozzi

Department of Energy Systems Territory and Construction Engineering, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 September 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giulia LambertiGiulia Lamberti
Giulia Lamberti
Giacomo SalvadoriGiacomo Salvadori
Giacomo Salvadori
Francesco LECCESEFrancesco LECCESE
Francesco LECCESE
Fabio FantozziFabio Fantozzi
Fabio Fantozzi
PBPhilomena Margaretha Bluyssen
Philomena Margaretha Bluyssen
The thermal environment in educational buildings is crucial to improve students’ health and productivity, as they spend a considerable amount of time in classrooms. Due to the complexity of educational buildings, research performed has been heterogeneous and standards for thermal comfort are based on office studies with adults. Moreover, they rely on single dose-response models that do not account for interactions with other environmental factors, or students’ individual preferences and needs. A literature study was performed on thermal comfort in educational buildings comprising of 143 field studies, to identify all possible confounding parameters involved in thermal perception. Educational stage, climate zone, model adopted to investigate comfort, and operation mode were then selected as confounding parameters and discussed to delineate the priorities for future research. Results showed that children often present with different thermal sensations than adults, which should be considered in the design of energy-efficient and comfortable educational environments. Furthermore, the use of different models to analyse comfort can influence field studies’ outcomes and should be carefully investigated. It is concluded that future studies should focus on a more rational evaluation of thermal comfort, also considering the effect that local discomfort can have on the perception of an environment. Moreover, it is important to carefully assess possible relationships between HVAC systems, building envelope, and thermal comfort, including their effect on energy consumption. Since several studies showed that the perception of the environment does not concern thermal comfort only, but it involves the aspects of indoor air, acoustic, and visual quality, their effect on the health and performance of the students should be assessed. This paper provides a way forward for researchers, which should aim to have an integrated approach through considering the positive effects of indoor exposure while considering possible individual differences.


22 April 2023 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GTGiulia Torriani
Giulia Torriani
Giulia LambertiGiulia Lamberti
Giulia Lamberti
GSGiacomo Salvadori
Giacomo Salvadori
Fabio FantozziFabio Fantozzi
Fabio Fantozzi
Francesco BabichFrancesco Babich
Francesco Babich

12 January 2020 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Fabio FantozziFabio Fantozzi
Fabio Fantozzi
MICHELE ROCCAMICHELE ROCCA
MICHELE ROCCA
Today, the effects of the indoor environment on occupants’ health and comfort represent a very important topic and requires a holistic approach in which the four main environmental factors (thermal comfort, air quality, acoustics, and lighting) should be simultaneously assessed. The present paper shows the results of a literature survey that aimed to collect the indicators for the evaluation of occupants’ health and comfort in indoor environmental quality evaluations. A broad number of papers that propose the indicators of a specific environmental factor is available in the scientific literature, but a review that collects the indicators of all four factors is lacking. In this review paper, the difference between indicators for the evaluation of risk for human health and for comfort evaluation is clarified. For each environmental factor, the risk for human health indicators are proposed with the relative threshold values, and the human comfort indicators are grouped into categories according to the number of parameters included, or the specific field of application for which they are proposed. Furthermore, the differences between human health and comfort indicators are highlighted.

1 December 2021 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Cristina PiselliCristina Piselli
Cristina Piselli
GSGiacomo Salvadori
Giacomo Salvadori
LDLorenzo Diciotti
Lorenzo Diciotti
Fabio FantozziFabio Fantozzi
Fabio Fantozzi
Anna Laura PiselloAnna Laura Pisello
Anna Laura Pisello

3 December 2019 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Fabio FantozziFabio Fantozzi
Fabio Fantozzi
Giulia LambertiGiulia Lamberti
Giulia Lamberti
In previous years, providing comfort in indoor environments has become a major question for researchers. Thus, indoor environmental quality (IEQ)—concerning the aspects of air quality, thermal comfort, visual and acoustical quality—assumed a crucial role. Considering sport facilities, the evaluation of the thermal environment is one of the main issues that should be faced, as it may interfere with athletes’ performance and health. Thus, the necessity of a review comprehending the existing knowledge regarding the evaluation of the thermal environment and its application to sport facilities becomes increasingly relevant. This paper has the purpose to consolidate the aspects related to thermal comfort and their application to sport practice, through a deep study concerning the engineering, physiological, and psychological approaches to thermal comfort, a review of the main standards on the topic and an analysis of the methodologies and the models used by researchers to determine the thermal sensation of sport facilities’ occupants. Therefore, this review provides the basis for future research on the determination of thermal comfort in indoor sport facilities located in moderate environments.