Hyperspectral image (HSI) analysis generally suffers from issues such as high dimensionality, imbalanced sample sets for different classes, and the choice of classifiers for artificially balanced datasets. The existing conventional data imbalance removal techniques and forest classifiers lack a more efficient approach to dealing with the aforementioned issues. In this study, we propose a novel hybrid methodology ADASYN-enhanced subsampled multi-grained cascade forest (ADA-Es-gcForest) which comprises four folds: First, we extracted the most discriminative global spectral features by reducing the vast dimensions, i.e., the redundant bands using principal component analysis (PCA). Second, we applied the subsampling-based adaptive synthetic minority oversampling method (ADASYN) to augment and balance the dataset. Third, we used the subsampled multi-grained scanning (Mg-sc) to extract the minute local spatial–spectral features by adaptively creating windows of various sizes. Here, we used two different forests—a random forest (RF) and a complete random forest (CRF)—to generate the input joint-feature vectors of different dimensions. Finally, for classification, we used the enhanced deep cascaded forest (CF) that improvised in the dimension reduction of the feature vectors and increased the connectivity of the information exchange between the forests at the different levels, which elevated the classifier model’s accuracy in predicting the exact class labels. Furthermore, the experiments were accomplished by collecting the three most appropriate, publicly available his landcover datasets—the Indian Pines (IP), Salinas Valley (SV), and Pavia University (PU). The proposed method achieved 91.47%, 98.76%, and 94.19% average accuracy scores for IP, SV, and PU datasets. The validity of the proposed methodology was testified against the contemporary state-of-the-art eminent tree-based ensembled methods, namely, RF, rotation forest (RoF), bagging, AdaBoost, extreme gradient boost, and deep multi-grained cascade forest (DgcForest), by simulating it numerically. Our proposed model achieved correspondingly higher accuracies than those classifiers taken for comparison for all the HS datasets.

Effective prioritization plays critical roles in precision medicine. Healthcare decisions are complex, involving trade-offs among numerous frequently contradictory priorities. Considering the numerous difficulties associated with COVID-19, approaches that could triage COVID-19 patients may help in prioritizing treatment and provide precise medicine for those who are at risk of serious disease. Prioritizing a patient with COVID-19 depends on a variety of examination criteria, but due to the large number of these biomarkers, it may be hard for medical practitioners and emergency systems to decide which cases should be given priority for treatment. The aim of this paper is to propose a Multidimensional Examination Framework (MEF) for the prioritization of COVID-19 severe patients on the basis of combined multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. In contrast to the existing literature, the MEF has not considered only a single dimension of the examination factors; instead, the proposed framework included different multidimensional examination criteria such as demographic, laboratory findings, vital signs, symptoms, and chronic conditions. A real dataset that consists of data from 78 patients with different examination criteria was used as a base in the construction of Multidimensional Evaluation Matrix (MEM). The proposed framework employs the CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) method to identify objective weights and importance for multidimensional examination criteria. Furthermore, the VIKOR (VIekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje) method is utilized to prioritize COVID-19 severe patients. The results based on the CRITIC method showed that the most important examination criterion for prioritization is COVID-19 patients with heart disease, followed by cough and nasal congestion symptoms. Moreover, the VIKOR method showed that Patients 8, 3, 9, 59, and 1 are the most urgent cases that required the highest priority among the other 78 patients. Finally, the proposed framework can be used by medical organizations to prioritize the most critical COVID-19 patient that has multidimensional examination criteria and to promptly give appropriate care for more precise medicine.

Bipolar disorder is marked by mood swings that alternate between mania and depression. The stages of bipolar disorder (BD), as one of the most common mental conditions, are often misdiagnosed as major depressive disorder (MDD), resulting in ineffective treatment and a poor prognosis. As a result, distinguishing MDD from BD at an earlier phase of the disease may aid in more efficient and targeted treatments. In this research, an enhanced ACO (IACO) technique biologically inspired by and following the required ant colony optimization (ACO) was utilized to minimize the number of features by deleting unrelated or redundant feature data. To distinguish MDD and BD individuals, the selected features were loaded into a support vector machine (SVM), a sophisticated mathematical technique for classification process, regression, functional estimates, and modeling operations. In respect of classifications efficiency and frequency of features extracted, the performance of the IACO method was linked to that of regular ACO, particle swarm optimization (PSO), and genetic algorithm (GA) techniques. The validation was performed using a nested cross-validation (CV) approach to produce nearly reliable estimates of classification error.

Objectives In an increasingly interconnected world, the effectiveness of health security (HeS) is pivotal in shaping informed health policies and enhancing public health outcomes. This study aims to analyses HeS in 27 non-EU European countries, identifying key priorities and trends, benchmarking against African and Eastern Mediterranean regions (EMR), and ranking and clustering health security performance to inform targeted interventions. Methods Utilizing 2019, 2021, and aggregated 2017–2021 data from six Global Health Security Index indicators, this study applied an integrated Entropy-CoCoSo-K-means framework. The Entropy method was employed to identify health security (HeS) priorities and trends in Non-EU countries, enabling cross-regional comparisons with African and EMR regions to highlight priority shifts and disparities. The Entropy-CoCoSo (Combined Compromise Solution) model generated dynamic rankings, while K-means clustering categorized countries into five risk clusters (high to dangerous). This integration facilitated cross-national dynamic rankings and cluster analyses, informing targeted interventions across Non-EU countries. Results Entropy analysis reveals that detection and reporting emerged as the most critical indicator (weight: 0.388), reflecting disparities in surveillance. The risk environment remains minimally influential (0.067), highlighting consistent vulnerabilities to external threats. Compliance with norms shows a sharp rise (0.091 → 0.123), indicating emerging regulatory gaps or uneven adherence to health standards post-2019. Cross-regional comparisons highlighted a focus on detection and reporting in non-EU countries versus an emphasis on prevention in Africa and healthcare infrastructure prioritization in the EMR. Ranking and clustering revealed stark disparities: Armenia, Norway, and the UK consistently ranked “High,” In contrast, Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, and Tajikistan (Cluster 5: “Dangerous”) exhibited systemic weaknesses. Conclusion This study underscores the need for tailored policies to address non-EU Europe’s evolving HeS challenges. Harmonizing surveillance systems, scaling preventive measures, and bridging compliance gaps are critical. Regional collaboration and resource reallocation to low-performing nations are essential to mitigate disparities.