Hussien Elshareef

Mr. Hussien Elshareef

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 April 2025 in Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Hussien ElshareefHussien Elshareef
Hussien Elshareef
Obid TursunovObid Tursunov
Obid Tursunov
SRSihao Ren
Sihao Ren
Katarzyna ŚpiewakKatarzyna Śpiewak
Katarzyna Śpiewak
AMAlina Rahayu Mohamed Mohamed
Alina Rahayu Mohamed Mohamed
Yuguang ZhouYuguang Zhou
Yuguang Zhou
This work aimed to conduct a kinetic study of cotton stalks (CSs) through TGA to examine the impact of reaction conditions on bio-oil yield derived from CS slow pyrolysis using a tube furnace lab-scale reactor, as well as a characterization of bio-oil and biochar products. The iso-conversional approaches of Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose (KAS) and Flynn–Wall–Ozawa (FWO) were applied to estimate kinetic parameter activation energy (Ea) for the range of conversion degrees (α = 0.1–0.9). The kinetic results demonstrated that the average values of Ea for secondary pyrolysis were lower compared to those of primary pyrolysis; this could be explained by the fact that mainly cellulose degrades during primary pyrolysis, which requires more energy to be degraded. The pyrolysis findings indicated that the highest yield of bio-oil was 38.5%, which occurred at conditions of 500 °C and 0.5–1 mm size, while retention time showed an insignificant effect on pyrolysis oil. GC–MS analysis demonstrated that bio-oil is dominated by phenol compounds, which account for more than 40% of its components. SEM and XRD analyses emphasized that biochar is porous and has an amorphous shape, respectively. It can be concluded that these outcomes confirm that CSs have the potential to be a good candidate for a feedstock material for bioenergy production via the pyrolysis process.

25 November 2025 in Biomass and Bioenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Hussien ElshareefHussien Elshareef
Hussien Elshareef
ANAssa Nsabiyeze
Assa Nsabiyeze
OTObid Tursunov
Obid Tursunov
RSRen Sihao
Ren Sihao
IKIslom Karimov
Islom Karimov
YZYuguang Zhou
Yuguang Zhou

20 March 2025 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YDYun Deng
Yun Deng
XRXueling Ran
Xueling Ran
Hussien ElshareefHussien Elshareef
Hussien Elshareef
Renjie DongRenjie Dong
Renjie Dong
Yuguang ZhouYuguang Zhou
Yuguang Zhou
Biomass pellets are increasingly recognized as a cost-effective and sustainable renewable energy source worldwide. However, comprehensive sustainability assessments of their production processes are scarce. To address this gap, three distinct scenarios in Northeast China were evaluated using emergy, economic, and environmental analysis methods: corn single production, corn–pellet co-production, and pellet production. A modified method for calculating the environmental loading rate (ELR) was proposed, which accounts for the environmental benefits associated with replacing coal with biomass pellets for heating. The results showed that corn–pellet co-production demonstrates superior energy efficiency compared to corn-only production, but presents a contrasting economic profile. The ELR for corn single production and corn–pellet co-production are 1.57 and 1.63, respectively, with corresponding emergy sustainability indices (ESI) of 0.89 and 0.84. After applying the modified method, the ELR and ESI for corn–pellet co-production were adjusted to 0.84 and 1.63, respectively, and the ESI of pellet production increased from 8.24 to 21.15. Furthermore, processing corn straw into biomass pellets for heating can reduce heating costs by approximately USD 254.26/hm2 and reduce emissions of SO2, NOx, CO, PM2.5, and CO2 by 9.12, 19.82, 580.31, 65.86, and 13,060.66 kg/hm2, respectively. Sensitivity analysis revealed that transportation distance and renewable electricity have a greater impact on pellet production than corn–pellet co-production. The ESI for pellet production decreases from 21.15 to 14.02 as transport distance increases from 20 km to 100 km, while it rises to 57.81 as the proportion of renewable energy in the power supply increases from 0% to 100%.