António Manuel de Amaral Ramos

Prof. António Manuel de Amaral Ramos

Aveiro University, Portugal
+1
orcid
Associate professor with habilitation

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 October 2007 in American Journal of Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMA. Moreno
A. Moreno
CCC. Cervera
C. Cervera
JGJ. Gavaldá
J. Gavaldá
MRM. Rovira
M. Rovira
RCRafael de la Camara
Rafael de la Camara
JCJordi Carratala
Jordi Carratala
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. The aim of this study is to describe the incidence, microbiology and outcomes of BSIs in transplant recipients in Spain. The Spanish Network for Research on Infection in Transplantation (RESITRA) is formed by 16 centers with transplant program in Spain. The incidence and characteristics of BSIs in transplant patients were obtained prospectively from the cohort. We included 3926 transplant recipients (2935 solid organ and 991 hematopoietic stem cell transplants). Overall, 730 episodes of BSIs were recorded with an incidence rate ranging from 3 episodes per 10 000 transplant days in kidney recipients to 44 episodes per 10 000 transplant days in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The most frequent sources were intravascular catheters and the most frequent microorganisms isolated were coagulase‐negative staphylococci. Crude mortality of BSIs was 7.8%, being highest in liver recipients (16%). Multidrug resistant nonfermentative gram‐negative BSIs had significantly worse prognosis than those caused by their susceptible counterparts (p = 0.015), but no differences were found between resistant and susceptible gram‐negative enteric bacilli, S. aureus or Candida spp. BSIs are still a major concern in transplant recipients. The increasing isolations of multiresistant microorganisms represent a challenge for the next years.

1 November 2006 in Medical Engineering & Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
António Manuel de Amaral RamosAntónio Manuel de Amaral Ramos
António Manuel de Amaral Ramos
JSJ.A. Simões
J.A. Simões
The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare tetrahedral and hexahedral finite element meshes of simplified and realistic proximal intact femur geometries. Theoretical expressions of stresses and strains were derived for the simplified model of the femur. For the analysis of the realistic geometry of the proximal femur, a CAD model of the third generation composite femur (Pacific Research Labs, Vashion Island, WA) was used and simulations were performed with Hyperworks (Altair Engineering, Inc., Troy, MI) finite element analysis software. Convergence tests with hexahedral (8- and 20-node brick-elements) and tetrahedral (4- and 10-node tetrahedrons) elements were analysed by comparing the periosteal von Mises stresses and principal strains at a selected point of the femur. The numerical periosteal strains were also compared with experimental ones to determine the accuracy of the finite elements. Overall, we concluded, for the simplified femur, that tetrahedral linear element allowed results more closely to theoretical ones, but hexahedral quadratic elements seem to be more stable and less influenced to the degree of refinement (NDOF) of the mesh. It was not possible to correlate these findings with those observed for the realistic proximal femur simulations where no significant differences were seen using refined meshes, with more than NDOF=20,000 for hexahedral elements.

20 October 2019 in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AFAj Festas
Aj Festas
António Manuel de Amaral RamosAntónio Manuel de Amaral Ramos
António Manuel de Amaral Ramos
J. Paulo DavimJ. Paulo Davim
J. Paulo Davim
Due to the increase in the life expectancy of world’s population, health care demands in terms of quality and accessibility are higher than ever before. Concerning the manufacturing of medical devices, the development of new biomaterials, new manufacturing methods and techniques have always been on researchers focus. In the development of a medical device, the choice of the proper material to be used is of the most importance, since its ability and capacity to fulfil the expected function will determine the success of the medical device itself. This work aims to do a review of those that are the most commonly used biomaterials. After an explanation on what are biomaterials and what defines them, a more in-depth approach is presented to each of the four major types of biomaterials: metal, polymer, ceramic, and composites, where their main characteristics and preferred applications in the area of medical devices are described.

1 December 2018 in Materials Today
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJoão P.G. Tarelho
João P.G. Tarelho
Marco P. Soares dos SantosMarco P. Soares dos Santos
Marco P. Soares dos Santos
JFJorge Ferreira
Jorge Ferreira
António Manuel de Amaral RamosAntónio Manuel de Amaral Ramos
António Manuel de Amaral Ramos
SKSvitlana Kopyl
Svitlana Kopyl
Andrei KholkinAndrei Kholkin
Andrei Kholkin

1 May 2003 in Journal of Materials Processing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
António Manuel de Amaral RamosAntónio Manuel de Amaral Ramos
António Manuel de Amaral Ramos
CRCarlos Relvas
Carlos Relvas
JSJ.A Simões
J.A Simões

1 December 2011 in Sensors and Actuators A: Physical
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Raul MoraisRaul Morais
Raul Morais
NSNuno Miguel dos Santos Pinto da Silva
Nuno Miguel dos Santos Pinto da Silva
PSPaulo M. Santos
Paulo M. Santos
CFClara M. Frias
Clara M. Frias
JFJorge Ferreira
Jorge Ferreira
Manuel José Cabral dos Santos ReisManuel José Cabral dos Santos Reis
Manuel José Cabral dos Santos Reis