Dalia Abbas

Dr. Dalia Abbas

Department of Environmental Science, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA.
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2018 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Enrico MarchiEnrico Marchi
Enrico Marchi
Woodam ChungWoodam Chung
Woodam Chung
RVRien Visser
Rien Visser
Dalia AbbasDalia Abbas
Dalia Abbas
TNTomas Nordfjell
Tomas Nordfjell
Andrea LaschiAndrea Laschi
Andrea Laschi

22 June 2017 in Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Dalia AbbasDalia Abbas
Dalia Abbas
FFFulvio Di Fulvio
Fulvio Di Fulvio
RSRaffaele Spinelli
Raffaele Spinelli
This paper offers a forest operations perspective in environmentally sensitive areas in Europe and the United States. The objective is to help inform key sustainability knowledge gaps in forest operations to reduce impacts on the environment and the equipment operators in these increasingly targeted and difficult to operate in areas. Under existing guidelines and best management practices, the protection of ecosystem services linked to soil, water, wildlife and biodiversity have rightly received the highest considerations. However, the connection between protecting these ecological values, safe operational practices and technological advancements is rarely well articulated. One means to address the operational and technological gap is the selection of equipment and tailor the work conditions to terrain type, forest features and management objectives. To that effect, this paper discusses the environmental, planning, equipment selection and operator considerations and proposes possible solutions and guidelines to contain both the operators’ safety and environmental risks in forest operations.

18 May 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LHLars Högbom
Lars Högbom
Dalia AbbasDalia Abbas
Dalia Abbas
KAKęstutis Armolaitis
Kęstutis Armolaitis
EBEndijs Baders
Endijs Baders
MFMartyn Futter
Martyn Futter
DZDaiga Zute
Daiga Zute
Forests are the dominant land cover in Nordic–Baltic countries, and forestry, the management of forests for improved ecosystem-service (ES) delivery, is an important contributor to sustainability. Forests and forestry support multiple United Nations Sustainability Goals (UN SDGs) and a number of EU policies, and can address conflicting environmental goals. Forests provide multiple ecosystem services and natural solutions, including wood and fibre production, food, clear and clean water and air, animal and plant habitats, soil formation, aesthetics, and cultural and social services. Carbon sequestered by growing trees is a key factor in the envisaged transition from a fossil-based to a biobased economy. Here, we highlight the possibilities of forest-based solutions to mitigate current and emerging societal challenges. We discuss forestry effects on forest ecosystems, focusing on the optimisation of ES delivery and the fulfilment of UN SDGs while counteracting unwanted effects. In particular, we highlight the trilemma of (i) increasing wood production to substitute raw fossil materials, (ii) increasing forest carbon storage capacity, and (iii) improving forest biodiversity and other ES delivery.

12 November 2021 in International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EYEfi Yuliati Yovi
Efi Yuliati Yovi
Dalia AbbasDalia Abbas
Dalia Abbas
TTTakuya Takahashi
Takuya Takahashi
Timber harvesting processes, especially motor-manual felling, are hazardous to forestry workers’ health and safety. The purpose of this study is to examine forestry workers’ mental safety models (at the supervisor and operator levels) using the Nordic safety climate questionnaire. This study also examines how operators and their families perceive workplace risks (dread and unknown risk factors). The safety climate analysis revealed that supervisors misunderstand management safety priority, competence, empowerment and justice. Additionally, this study found that operators do not yet prioritize safety. There was a lack of safety communication and operators’ skepticism about the current safety system. These findings highlight the critical importance of implementing safety measures into operators’ work environments. The risk perception analysis revealed that family members had a greater risk aversion to dread risk factors than operators. As a result, we see a possibility for family members to act as safety-net figures, bolstering the operators’ safety values.

9 September 2021 in Fuels
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KSKamalakanta Sahoo
Kamalakanta Sahoo
SASevda Alanya-Rosenbaum
Sevda Alanya-Rosenbaum
RBRichard Bergman
Richard Bergman
Dalia AbbasDalia Abbas
Dalia Abbas
EBE. M. (Ted) Bilek
E. M. (Ted) Bilek
This study assessed the environmental impacts and economic feasibility of generating heat using wood-briquettes (WBs), and heat and electricity using torrefied-wood-briquettes (TWBs). WBs and TWBs were manufactured from forest residues using portable systems and delivered to either residential consumers or power plants in the United States. An integrated cradle-to-grave life-cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) approach was used to quantify environmental impacts and minimum-selling prices (MSPs) of heat and electricity, respectively. Results illustrated that 82% and 59% of the cradle-to-grave global warming (GW) impact of producing heat resulted from the feedstock preparation in WBs and torrefaction in TWBs, respectively. About 46–54% of total cost in the production of heat were from labor and capital costs only. The GW impact of electricity production with TWBs was dominated by the torrefaction process (48% contribution). Capital cost (50%) was a major contributor to the total cost of electricity production using TWBs. The GW impacts of producing heat were 7–37 gCO₂eq/MJ for WBs, and 14–51 gCO₂eq/MJ for TWBs, whereas producing electricity using TWBs was 146–443 gCO₂eq/kWhe. MSPs of generating heat from WBs and TWBs were €1.09–€1.73 and €1.60–€2.26/MJ, respectively, whereas the MSP of electricity from TWBs was €20–€25/kWhe. Considering carbon and pile-burn credits, MSPs of heat and electricity were reduced by 60–90% compared to the base-case.

10 July 2018 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAnil Koirala
Anil Koirala
Anil Raj KizhaAnil Raj Kizha
Anil Raj Kizha
CDCornelis DeHoop
Cornelis DeHoop
BRBrian Roth
Brian Roth
HHHan-Sup Han
Han-Sup Han
KSKamalakanta Sahoo
Kamalakanta Sahoo
Secondary transportation of raw and comminuted forest products is a major component in forest harvesting operations in terms of economics, public perception, and safety. Consequently, there is a substantial amount of literature on this topic. The existing literature has dealt with many of the technical aspects of transportation with a majority of them focusing on improving supply chain issues; however, there are only few specific to secondary transportation issues in general. This annotated bibliography will help practitioners, researchers, and stakeholders gain a better understanding of the existing literature from 2000 to 2015. To this end, we began by classifying the selected literature into six themes: cost, roads and routes, trucking, efficiency and safety, other modes of transportation, and supply chain and optimization. Woody biomass for bioenergy production was the most researched forest product with respect to transportation. About one-third of the articles were presented in the context of supply chain modeling and optimization. More than half of the studies originated from Europe while the United States had the most publications for any given country. Most articles (16) were published in 2013. Biomass and Bioenergy published the highest number of articles (29) during the timeframe.