Tomáš Dominik

Dr. Tomáš Dominik

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 March 2020 in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ANAndrea Němcová
Andrea Němcová
VSVeronika Svozilova
Veronika Svozilova
KBKaterina Bucsuhazy
Katerina Bucsuhazy
RSRadovan Smisek
Radovan Smisek
MMMartin Mezl
Martin Mezl
RKRadim Kolář
Radim Kolář
Driver fatigue and stress significantly contribute to higher number of car accidents worldwide. Although, different detection approaches have been already commercialized and used by car producers (and third party companies), research activities in this field are still needed in order to increase the reliability of these alert systems. Also, in the context of automated driving, the driver mental state assessment will be an important part of cars in future. This paper presents state-of-the-art review of different approaches for driver fatigue and stress detection and evaluation. We describe in details various signals (biological, car and video) and derived features used for these tasks and we discuss their relevance and advantages. In order to make this review complete, we also describe different datasets, acquisition systems and experiment scenarios.

9 December 2023 in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TDTomáš Dominik
Tomáš Dominik
AMAlfred Mele
Alfred Mele
ASAaron Schurger
Aaron Schurger
UMUri Maoz
Uri Maoz

1 March 2017 in Consciousness and Cognition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TDTomáš Dominik
Tomáš Dominik
DDDaniel Dostál
Daniel Dostál
MZMartin Zielina
Martin Zielina
JŠJan Šmahaj
Jan Šmahaj
ZSZuzana Sedláčková
Zuzana Sedláčková
RPRoman Procházka
Roman Procházka

1 February 2023 in Royal Society Open Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MPMerle-Marie Pittelkow
Merle-Marie Pittelkow
SFSarahanne M. Field
Sarahanne M. Field
PIPeder M. Isager
Peder M. Isager
AVAnna E. Van’t Veer
Anna E. Van’t Veer
TAThomas Anderson
Thomas Anderson
DRDon van Ravenzwaaij
Don van Ravenzwaaij
Increased execution of replication studies contributes to the effort to restore credibility of empirical research. However, a second generation of problems arises: the number of potential replication targets is at a serious mismatch with available resources. Given limited resources, replication target selection should be well-justified, systematic and transparently communicated. At present the discussion on what to consider when selecting a replication target is limited to theoretical discussion, self-reported justifications and a few formalized suggestions. In this Registered Report, we proposed a study involving the scientific community to create a list of considerations for consultation when selecting a replication target in psychology. We employed a modified Delphi approach. First, we constructed a preliminary list of considerations. Second, we surveyed psychologists who previously selected a replication target with regards to their considerations. Third, we incorporated the results into the preliminary list of considerations and sent the updated list to a group of individuals knowledgeable about concerns regarding replication target selection. Over the course of several rounds, we established consensus regarding what to consider when selecting a replication target. The resulting checklist can be used for transparently communicating the rationale for selecting studies for replication.

1 October 2018 in Consciousness and Cognition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TDTomáš Dominik
Tomáš Dominik
DDDaniel Dostál
Daniel Dostál
MZMartin Zielina
Martin Zielina
JŠJan Šmahaj
Jan Šmahaj
ZSZuzana Sedláčková
Zuzana Sedláčková
RPRoman Procházka
Roman Procházka

11 April 2022 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ladislav StankeLadislav Stanke
Ladislav Stanke
LVLucie Viktorova
Lucie Viktorova
TDTomáš Dominik
Tomáš Dominik
The broad application of LEDs for automotive lighting purposes, together with new discoveries in vision physiology, is creating new challenges in the field of glare perception. The purpose of this study was to link subjective and objective measures of driver-perceived glare following different light sources used in car headlamps. In order to achieve this, a combination of subjective evaluation using an adapted version of the de Boer scale and objective measures based on psychophysiological data was applied. Predominantly, skin conductance response (SCR), heart rate variability (HRV), and eye-blinking frequency (vertical electrooculography, vEOG) were recorded. Though there was some evidence suggesting lower discomfort with glare from light sources with a lower correlated color temperature, the results were generally inconclusive. This illustrates the urgent need to study the linkage between light source properties and subjective and objective glare measures in deeper detail, so that the technical norms governing car headlamps can reflect the needs of human physiology and psychophysiology.