This review aims to increase attention on present water quality issues on Central Asia, finding gaps in the literature on ways to address treatment needs, and help ensure future use of Central Asia surface waters and groundwater for all beneficial uses. Central Asia is a landlocked region known for its harsh climatic conditions and scarce water resources, despite being home to some of the world’s largest internal drainage basins. The available literature suggests that increasing salinity has rendered water unsuitable for irrigation and consumption; hazardous trace elements are found throughout Central Asia, most often associated with mining and industrial sources; and that legacy pesticides influence water quality, particularly in agriculturally influenced basins. This study also focuses on the effects of municipal and industrial wastewater discharge. Additionally, the impact of inadequately treated wastewater on water resources is analyzed through a review of available data and reports regarding surface and groundwater quantity and quality. Given the challenges of water scarcity and accessibility, the reuse of treated wastewater is becoming increasingly important, offering a valuable alternative that necessitates careful oversight to ensure public health, environmental sustainability, and water security. However, due to insufficient financial and technical resources, along with underdeveloped regulatory frameworks, many urban areas lack adequate wastewater treatment facilities, significantly constraining their safe and sustainable reuse. Proper management of wastewater effluent is critical, as it directly influences the quality of both surface and groundwater, which serve as key sources for drinking water and irrigation. Due to their persistent and biologically active nature even at trace levels, we discuss contaminants of emerging concern such as antibiotics, pharmaceuticals, and modern agrochemicals. This review thus highlights gaps in the literature reporting on impacts of wastewater inputs to water quality in Central Asia. It is recommended that future research and efforts should focus on exploring sustainable solutions for water quality management and pollution control to assure environmental sustainability and public health.

Pharmaceuticals such as paracetamol and diclofenac (DCF) are among the most extensively consumed drugs worldwide and are continuously released into municipal and hospital wastewater due to incomplete human metabolism. Their persistent presence in aquatic environments, typically ranging from ng/L to µg/L, raises concerns due to endocrine disruption, chronic toxicity, and the promotion of antimicrobial resistance. Conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) remove 70–90% of ACT but less than 30% of DCF, primarily because these systems were not designed to target low-concentration, recalcitrant micropollutants. As a result, pharmaceuticals frequently pass into treated effluents, highlighting the need for advanced, sustainable, and passive treatment solutions. Permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) have emerged as a promising technology for the interception and removal of pharmaceuticals from both wastewater treatment plant effluents and groundwater. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of ACT and DCF occurrence, environmental behavior, and ecotoxicological risks, followed by a detailed evaluation of PRB performance using advanced reactive media such as geopolymers, activated carbon, carbon nanotubes, and hybrid composites. Reported removal efficiencies exceed 90% for ACT and 70–95% for DCF, depending on media composition and operating conditions. The primary removal mechanisms include adsorption, ion exchange, π–π interactions, hydrogen bonding, and redox transformation. The novelty of this review lies in systematically synthesizing recent laboratory- and pilot-scale findings on PRBs for pharmaceutical removal, identifying critical knowledge gaps—including long-term field validation, media regeneration, and performance under realistic wastewater matrices—and outlining future research directions for scaling PRBs toward full-scale implementation. The study demonstrates that PRBs represent a viable and sustainable tertiary treatment option for reducing pharmaceutical loads in aquatic environments.

Microplastics (MPs, plastic particles < 5 mm) and nanoplastics (NPs, plastic particles generally <1 µm), collectively referred to as micro/nanoplastics (MNPs), have emerged as critical contaminants in wastewater systems due to their persistence, small size, and ability to act as vectors for co-contaminants. Conventional wastewater treatment technologies are often insufficient for the effective removal of microplastics, particularly for smaller particles and nanoplastics, necessitating the development of functional materials and innovative treatment strategies. In this review, recent advances in carbon-based materials, cellulose-based materials, and their hybrid carbon–cellulose composites for microplastics removal are critically analyzed and comparatively discussed. Particular attention is given to the structure–function relationships governing adsorption performance, including the roles of hierarchical porosity, surface chemistry, and interfacial interactions. The key mechanisms responsible for microplastics capture—such as hydrophobic interactions, π–π stacking, hydrogen bonding, electrostatic attraction, physical entrapment, and pore trapping—are systematically discussed. Carbon–cellulose composite materials are highlighted as a promising class of multifunctional adsorbents due to their synergistic combination of hydrophilic cellulose scaffolds and hydrophobic carbon domains. This dual functionality enables efficient removal of microplastics across a wide range of sizes and morphologies. Recent developments in magnetic and superhydrophobic composite systems further demonstrate enhanced separation efficiency, recyclability, and potential applicability in real wastewater environments. In addition to summarizing recent progress, this review critically examines the methodological inconsistencies, mechanistic uncertainties, and practical limitations associated with current adsorption systems. Despite significant progress, several challenges remain, including the lack of standardized evaluation methods, limited validation under real wastewater conditions, material stability issues, and scalability constraints. Future research directions are proposed, focusing on rational material design, sustainable carbon sources, multifunctional hybrid systems, and integration into existing treatment infrastructures. The development of sustainable hybrid adsorption systems for microplastics remediation also contributes to the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) by supporting improved wastewater treatment technologies and reduction in emerging aquatic contaminants.

This review provides a comprehensive analysis of organically grafted clay minerals modified with organo-alkoxides, silanes, and amine-based compounds for water treatment applications. Emphasis is placed on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as representative emerging contaminants due to their persistence and environmental relevance. The review systematically examines synthesis strategies, surface functionalization mechanisms, and structure–performance relationships governing adsorption behavior. The analysis demonstrates that adsorption performance is controlled by the interplay between grafting chemistry, surface accessibility, and environmental conditions rather than adsorption capacity alone. While ion-exchange organoclays exhibit high adsorption capacities under controlled conditions, covalently grafted and polymer-modified systems provide superior stability and resistance to leaching. However, discrepancies in experimental conditions across studies limit direct comparison of reported adsorption capacities. The review identifies key challenges related to regeneration efficiency, environmental safety, and scalability, and highlights that long-term stability and compatibility with realistic water matrices are decisive factors for practical implementation. Future research should focus on standardized testing protocols, pilot-scale validation, and comprehensive environmental risk assessment.

Sustainable water resource management in arid and transboundary-dependent regions requires that hydrological assessment be integrated with institutional governance analysis. This study provides a comprehensive hydro-institutional evaluation of water sustainability in Kazakhstan using a multi-source empirical framework. The analysis is based on international and national datasets (FAO AQUASTAT, World Bank, national statistics for 2010–2024) and incorporates key indicators, including per capita renewable water resources, sectoral withdrawal structure, transboundary dependence, and water stress. In addition, a Water Sustainability Composite Index and a Regional Vulnerability Index were developed to capture system-wide sustainability and spatial heterogeneity. The results show that Kazakhstan possesses moderate renewable water availability (approximately 5411 m³ per capita per year), yet exhibits significant structural vulnerability due to high transboundary dependence (40.64%), dominant agricultural water use (≈57%), and infrastructure inefficiencies (25–35% losses). Regional analysis reveals substantial disparities, with southern irrigation-dependent regions demonstrating higher vulnerability compared to resource-abundant eastern basins. Elasticity analysis indicates that improvements in irrigation efficiency have a substantially greater impact on sustainability than equivalent changes in transboundary inflows, highlighting the dominant role of internal system performance. The findings suggest that water sustainability in Kazakhstan is primarily constrained by governance effectiveness and efficiency limitations rather than absolute resource scarcity. This study contributes to the literature by integrating quantitative hydrological indicators with institutional analysis through a composite modeling framework, demonstrating that internal system efficiency—particularly irrigation performance—has a significantly greater influence on sustainability outcomes than external hydrological variability. The proposed approach provides a transferable methodology for assessing water sustainability in semi-arid and transboundary contexts.

The increasing penetration of renewable energy sources (RES) introduces significant variability and instability in modern power systems, creating a growing need for advanced and coordinated energy storage solutions. However, a key unresolved challenge remains the integrated modeling and optimal sizing of hybrid energy storage systems (ESS) that combine technologies with different temporal characteristics under high RES penetration. This study addresses this challenge by developing a unified techno-economic and physical–mathematical framework for hybrid ESS integrating lithium-ion (Li-ion), vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFB), and hydrogen (H₂) technologies. Unlike conventional approaches that treat storage technologies independently or use simplified hybrid representations, the proposed framework jointly considers dynamic energy balance, degradation-aware lifecycle behavior, and multi-criteria cost optimization. The model was implemented using Python 3.10-based simulation tools and evaluated under renewable penetration scenarios of 30%, 50%, and 70%. The results indicate that increasing RES penetration leads to higher power fluctuations, reaching ±15–20% at 50% RES and ±20–25% at 70% RES. The optimized hybrid system achieves an overall efficiency of up to 92%, reduces total system cost to approximately 450 USD/kWh, and extends operational lifetime to 25 years, demonstrating a balanced techno-economic performance compared to standalone storage technologies. The proposed framework addresses this gap by coupling dynamic energy balance analysis with degradation-aware techno-economic optimization, enabling coordinated allocation of storage functions across short-, medium-, and long-duration timescales. In this way, the study not only evaluates hybrid storage performance, but also provides a practical decision-support framework for renewable-dominated power systems, particularly in the context of Kazakhstan’s energy transition.