Objective: This study aims to investigate the mechanical behavior of titanium (Ti6Al4V) mini-implants (MIs) under varying orthodontic forces using finite element analysis (FEA) and to evaluate their performance and durability under realistic clinical conditions. Optimal orthodontic forces significantly influence the structural integrity and functional longevity of MIs while minimizing adverse effects on surrounding bone tissues. Materials and Methods: A commercially available MI (diameter: 2.0 mm, length: 12 mm) was modeled using FEA. The mandible geometry was obtained using computed tomography (CT) scanning, reconstructed in 3D using SpaceClaim software 2023.1, and discretized into 10-node tetrahedral elements in ANSYS Workbench. Material properties were assigned based on the existing literature, and the implant–bone interaction was simulated using a nonlinear frictional contact model. Orthodontic forces of 2 N and 10 N, inclined at 30°, were applied to simulate clinical loading conditions. Total displacement, von Mises stresses, equivalent strains, fatigue life, and safety factors were analyzed to assess the implant’s mechanical performance. Results: At 2 N, the MI demonstrated minimal displacement (0.0328 mm) and sustained approximately 445,000 cycles under safe fatigue loading conditions, with a safety factor of 4.8369. At 10 N, the implant’s lifespan was drastically reduced to 1546 cycles, with significantly elevated stress (6.468 × 10⁵ MPa) and strain concentrations, indicating heightened risks of mechanical failure and bone damage. The findings revealed the critical threshold beyond which orthodontic forces compromise implant stability and peri-implant bone health. Conclusions: This study confirms that maintaining orthodontic forces within an optimal range, approximately 2 N, is essential to prolong MI lifespan and preserve bone integrity. Excessive forces, such as 10 N, lead to a rapid decline in durability and increased risks of failure, emphasizing the need for calibrated force application in clinical practice. These insights provide valuable guidance for enhancing MI performance and optimizing orthodontic treatment outcomes.

Background/Objectives: The stabilization disc (SD) for orthodontic mini-implants is a novel device designed to enhance anchorage stability and minimize the risk of mini-implant mobility. The disc features a flat structure with four prongs and is crafted from biocompatible materials such as titanium or stainless steel. It provides additional support to mini-implants by improving force distribution and reducing stress concentration around the insertion site. This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical performance of mini-implants with an SD compared to without-SD mini-implants, with a specific focus on their ability to maintain anchorage under orthodontic loading conditions. Methods: A finite element analysis (FEA) model was created for a commercially available mini-implant (2.0 mm in diameter and 12 mm in length). The mandible’s anatomical structure was reconstructed in 3D from computed tomography (CT) scans using SpaceClaim software 2023.1. To simulate real-world orthodontic conditions, forces of 10 N were applied at an angle of 30°. This retrospective study explores the role of SDs in enhancing mini-implant stability by reducing displacement and optimizing stress distribution. The evaluation included analyzing von Mises stress, cortical bone deformation, and mini-implant movement under simulated orthodontic loading. Results: The results demonstrate that the SD significantly reduces maximum total displacements by over 41% and redistributes von Mises stresses more evenly across the mini-implant and surrounding bone. Cortical bone stress and deformation were reduced in cases utilizing the SD, indicating enhanced implant stability and durability. Conclusions: The stabilization disc enhances mini-implant stability by improving stress distribution and reducing deformation without requiring permanent implant modifications. Its adaptability makes it a valuable solution for managing variable bone density and high orthodontic forces, offering a promising advancement in orthodontic anchorage.

Background: Orthodontic treatment is increasingly recognised as a complex, patient-centred intervention whose impact extends beyond occlusal correction to include physical comfort, psychosocial well-being, and self-perceived esthetics. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) has therefore become a key outcome for evaluating orthodontic care across all treatment stages. Aim: This narrative review of 140 studies synthesises current evidence on OHRQoL changes in orthodontic patients before treatment, during active therapy, and after treatment completion, with particular emphasis on temporal patterns and appliance-related differences. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review of 140 studies was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar (search period: inception to December 2025). Studies assessing OHRQoL or patient-reported outcomes in orthodontic patients of any age were included. Only studies employing validated instruments, such as OHIP, CPQ, OIDP, and PIDAQ, were considered. Dual-reviewer agreement was assessed using Cohen’s kappa (κ = 0.82). Formal risk-of-bias assessment was conducted using ROBINS-I for non-randomised studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs. Sensitivity analyses were performed comparing high-quality studies (low risk of bias, n = 52) versus all included studies. Results: The reviewed evidence consistently demonstrates that malocclusion is associated with impaired baseline OHRQoL, particularly affecting psychosocial and esthetic domains. The early phase of orthodontic treatment is marked by a transient deterioration in OHRQoL due to pain, discomfort, speech disturbances, and functional limitations (87% of studies report pain peaks within 24–48 h; 79% report resolution by 4–7 days). These effects typically diminish as patients adapt to the appliance. Progressive improvement is observed during mid-treatment, while treatment completion is associated with substantial long-term gains in self-esteem, social functioning, and overall quality of life. Appliance type influences short-term outcomes, with clear aligners generally associated with better early OHRQoL than fixed and lingual systems (65–75% of studies favour aligners for early comfort; 78% favour lingual systems for esthetic satisfaction). Conclusions: Orthodontic treatment follows a dynamic, time-dependent OHRQoL trajectory characterised by short-term impairment and significant long-term psychosocial benefits. Systematic integration of validated OHRQoL measures into orthodontic care may enhance patient-centred decision-making and optimise clinical outcomes.

This study analyzed factors influencing the choice between Rapid Palatal Expansion (RPE), Miniscrew-Assisted RPE (MARPE), and Surgically Assisted RPE (SARPE) for treating maxillary transverse deficiency. Through a systematic review of literature from 2015-2025, key selection criteria were identified. The maturation stage of the midpalatal suture (Angelieri classification) was found to be the most critical factor, superseding chronological age, with non-surgical expansion becoming less predictable in advanced fusion stages (D and E). Additional factors include bone density, patient sex, and device positioning. The findings underscore the necessity for CBCT-based, personalized treatment protocols to ensure successful skeletal expansion, optimize clinical outcomes, and improve long-term stability.